Wimbo
Active Member
- Messages
- 4,133
- Reaction score
- 3
Hostile;2105554 said:He's physical enough to tackle TEs as a Safety, but is he sturdy enough to stay healthy at it? Therein lies the dilemma.
Toss him a couple of biscuits.
Hostile;2105554 said:He's physical enough to tackle TEs as a Safety, but is he sturdy enough to stay healthy at it? Therein lies the dilemma.
theogt;2105568 said:Interesting that he's taking Nate Jones' spot in the dime corner package instead of staying outside. That's more of a slot corner spot than a safety-like spot there. I doubt we'd use that package against an offense with a TE on the field.
We ran the package last year with Nate Jones. It's the same package, but Henry is playing where Nate Jones played. Stewart talked about this during the draft. They wanted to use this package more often last year, but Nate Jones sucked arse.dcfanatic;2105733 said:LOL. Classic.
How about he is replacing Roy in that package bro.
Hamlin and Watkins at deep cover
Newman, Pacman and Jenkins in man on the WR's.
Henry and Burnett/Zach as the 'Nickel LB's'
Four pass rushers - Ware, Spencer, Ellis and pick a guy.
This would be an offense defense against a spread offense in a 3WR, 1TE, 1RB set.
He's not going to bulk up just because he will be playing the dime corner. If he's switching from cornerback to linebacker, yes. Otherwise, no.Cogan;2105628 said:At 6-1, 205, Henry would have 3 months to pack on another 5-10 lbs. of muscle. At 215, Henry would be big enough to take on TEs and also stuff the run. He's always been one of the most physical corner on the team, so that doesn't worry me.
theogt;2105568 said:I doubt we'd use that package against an offense with a TE on the field.
Hostile;2105554 said:He's physical enough to tackle TEs as a Safety, but is he sturdy enough to stay healthy at it? Therein lies the dilemma.
He's a UFA after 2009, wouldn't surprise me if given the depth at CB once Jones is reinstated if he's not shopped. No way they'll re-sign him given the money tied up there and the youth with Jones, Jenkins, and Scandrick.
Maybe I didn't convey my thought as well as I could have. If they have a 3 WR set with 4th athletic TE, that obviously make sense. But last year we ran the package most often when teams would put out 4 receiver sets.Little Jr;2106145 said:"They said what they want me to do is when we play like Washington or the Giants to go against their Pro Bowl tight ends," Henry said "I can do a better job covering those guys. It's like a package."
Ummm. Maybe Henry missed understood the coaches.
dcfanatic;2105733 said:LOL. Classic.
How about he is replacing Roy in that package bro.
Hamlin and Watkins at deep cover
Newman, Pacman and Jenkins in man on the WR's.
Henry and Burnett/Zach as the 'Nickel LB's'
Four pass rushers - Ware, Spencer, Ellis and pick a guy.
This would be an awesome defense against a spread offense in a 3WR, 1TE, 1RB set.
They're all replacing Bradie!!1111AdamJT13;2106200 said:Like theogt said, last year, when we played dime safety, Roy was on the field. When we played dime corner, Nate Jones came in and Roy went out. This year, Henry would be in Jones' spot, replacing Roy in that package. So yes, Henry will be replacing Jones when he is replacing Roy.
Chief;2105556 said:Who used to cover the opposing team's tight ends?
~ ducks ~
Little Jr;2106145 said:"They said what they want me to do is when we play like Washington or the Giants to go against their Pro Bowl tight ends," Henry said "I can do a better job covering those guys. It's like a package."
Ummm. Maybe Henry missed understood the coaches.
Thehoofbite;2106288 said:Dude, your signature just doesn't work.
I've seen it for a while but didn't really care but every time I am at work and viewing a thread, I can tell that you have posted because it stretches the page out to the point where I have to scroll over.
Not a big deal and not a hard fix but just throwing that out there.
Little Jr;2106290 said:Yeah I've been meaning to take it off but just been lazy. I did not realize it stretches the page out. It doesnt on my home pc or work pc. Sorry. If someone would have mentioned sooner I would have taken it off.
Well at least there was a way I was notice in a thread.