- Messages
- 79,281
- Reaction score
- 45,648
10:33 AM Thu, Jan 29, 2009 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Jean-Jacques Taylor http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips
It's fair to say Peter King doesn't think Bob Hayes is a Hall of Fame player, although he thinks there's a pretty good chance Hayes will be enshrined in pro football's hallowed halls this weekend.
This is what King wrote about Hayes in his column last week:
He gave me one name: Homer Jones, a speedster known more for inventing the touchdown spike than playing receiver.
Is Hayes that much better than Jones? Do you still think he's a no-brainer?
King told me the stats between Hayes and Jones were comparable during their first five seasons. Jones, for those of you who don't know, was a 9.2 sprinter in the 100-yard dash; Hayes ran it in 9.1 seconds.
King urged me to check out the stats for myself and make my own decision.
If you want the year-by-year for Jones, go here. For Hayes, you can find it here.
Bottom line: In Hayes' first five seasons, he caught 252 passes for 4,888 yards (a 19.3 average) with 49 touchdowns, while Jones caught 172 passes for 4,101 yards (a 23.8 average) with 34 touchdowns.
"No one has ever been able to tell me why Bob Hayes changed the game," said King, "and Homer Jones didn't."
Here's a piece five years ago that Paul Zimmer, one of the journalists King respects most, wrote about Hayes' impact on the game.
King has a Hall of Fame vote. What he thinks matters.
Jean-Jacques Taylor http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips
It's fair to say Peter King doesn't think Bob Hayes is a Hall of Fame player, although he thinks there's a pretty good chance Hayes will be enshrined in pro football's hallowed halls this weekend.
This is what King wrote about Hayes in his column last week:
"There's a lot of momentum for Hayes, and I put his chances this high because he's one of two seniors. Lots of the old players think Hayes should have been in long ago, and I think he'll be sold hard by those in the room on his side. I am unconvinced that he "changed the game,'' as many of his advocates say, but I will be open to his candidacy."
I've known King for years and picked his brain on more than one occasion. So when I saw him today before the Cardinals' media session, I asked why he wasn't sold on Bob Hayes.He gave me one name: Homer Jones, a speedster known more for inventing the touchdown spike than playing receiver.
Is Hayes that much better than Jones? Do you still think he's a no-brainer?
King told me the stats between Hayes and Jones were comparable during their first five seasons. Jones, for those of you who don't know, was a 9.2 sprinter in the 100-yard dash; Hayes ran it in 9.1 seconds.
King urged me to check out the stats for myself and make my own decision.
If you want the year-by-year for Jones, go here. For Hayes, you can find it here.
Bottom line: In Hayes' first five seasons, he caught 252 passes for 4,888 yards (a 19.3 average) with 49 touchdowns, while Jones caught 172 passes for 4,101 yards (a 23.8 average) with 34 touchdowns.
"No one has ever been able to tell me why Bob Hayes changed the game," said King, "and Homer Jones didn't."
Here's a piece five years ago that Paul Zimmer, one of the journalists King respects most, wrote about Hayes' impact on the game.
King has a Hall of Fame vote. What he thinks matters.