DMN Blog:Do it like Dallas.... or Antonio

ethiostar

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,309
Reaction score
46
Didn't see this posted anywhere.......

http://cowboysblog.***BANNED-URL***/archives/2008/05/do-it-like-dallas-or-antonio.html

Do it like Dallas ... or Antonio

3:05 PM Sun, May 04, 2008 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Albert Breer http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips


Why are you looking at an Antonio Gates video here? Simple. If the you want the answer to the Cowboys' "need" for a second high-level receiver, you might be able to find it in how the Chargers employ their All-Pro tight end, or how the Colts use their elite tight end, Dallas Clark.

Both Gates and Clark are constantly flexed out into the slot, and even at the outside flanker or split end spots. And that's the first thing that popped into my head when listening to Wade Phillips' passionately defend the crew of receivers that the Cowboys have on the roster now.

"I think we put ourselves in a situation where we said, 'Boy, we want to get somebody across from Terrell," Wade said. "Like I said the other day, there aren't many Terrell Owens, there aren't many great, great receivers like him. So to get somebody like him is awfully hard. But I do believe in the guys we have.

"We were fourth in the NFL in passing last year, second in scoring and a first in average per attempt to the receivers that we had. We did not lose any receiver off this football team, the only one we lost was Terry Glenn, who didn't play last year. So to say, 'Boy, we need receivers, I'm not sure that's the case. And I think everybody got riled up and disappointed we didn't get a receiver.

"Well, we had a lot of yards passing to somebody, and it wasn't just Terrell. Part of our great receiver on the other side of Terrell, is Jason Witten. He's the other guy that caught 96 passes. But the other receivers, Patrick Crayton and those guys, are good receivers too. I don't think it killed our passing game.

"Certainly with the quarterback we have and the receivers we have, in the same offense for another year, we might even get better without adding some big name guy. And the young guys are going to be really good players. The three young ones we have, any one of those could be an all-star caliber player."


Wade's best point -- How overlooked Witten has been during this offseason. And it should be to see how drafting Martellus Bennett could allow the offensive coaches more flexibility in how to deploy him.

I talked to a couple of the offensive coaches over the last few days, and they indicated how Bennett is able to play both the in-line ("Y") and off-set ("F") tight end positions. So can Witten.

At this point, most accounts say that Bennett's a more polished blocker than he is a receiver. So you can come out of the huddle, and put Bennett in-line, and line up Witten in the slot. And that -- like it does with the Colts and Chargers -- creates problems for a defense. Either they put a defensive back on Witten, or they pull a linebacker out of the box to help.

Or you can leave, say, Crayton in the slot, and line up Witten outside at the "Z", where you might just get a one-on-one situation (ala Shockey-on-Roy last year). Meanwhile, Owens is already forcing you to defend all areas of the field on the other end and constantly putting all kinds of pressure on the coverage.

Fact is, all this says that Wade's right. Even without a Roy Williams or a Chad Johnson or an Anquan Boldin, there are versatile pieces at other positions for Jason Garrett to play with.

Are the Cowboys the deepest team in the league at receiver? No. Not by a longshot. But there are few teams that can match them when you put all the offensive skill players together and count them as a group.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
ethiostar;2070523 said:
"We were fourth in the NFL in passing last year, second in scoring and a first in average per attempt to the receivers that we had. We did not lose any receiver off this football team, the only one we lost was Terry Glenn, who didn't play last year. So to say, 'Boy, we need receivers, I'm not sure that's the case. And I think everybody got riled up and disappointed we didn't get a receiver.
Huh??
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
thats all fine and dandy but we know how this group handles being without TO.I hope we dont have to find out again.
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Since the Cowboys weren't able to trade for any of the 3 WRs we wanted, & didn't believe any of the 2008 WRs warranted a first round pick/or any pick at all, we are going with what we already have but plan to utilize Witten and/or Bennett like Chargers or Colts did with their TEs. I thought we did that last year with Witten but maybe we couldn't do it enough cause frequently we had to keep him inside to block for Romo--something that Fasano wasn't that good at. It's just that the Colts have several pretty good younger WRs (in preparatin for when M.Harrison's career is over) & Clark. Admittedly the Chargers only had Gates but did add WR Chambers of the Dolphins in a trade that really improved their passing game. Besides the Chargers have a great defense & don't need to put up big offensive numbers.

But I still don't buy this business about not needing another WR cause you can't find a TO. Well, I'm not saying we need another TO (although that would be great) but a legit #2 WR would be welcome. Maybe Jerry should stop looking at top tier WRs in the NFL (most not available) & just look for a legit WR who a big upgrade over Crayton & whose maybe in his 20s. It sure would cost would cost a lot less in draft picks/cap money. Too bad we unable sign Javon Walker but Al Davis money was ridiculous. Here's hoping a vet WR gets cut during TC because that team has too many younger & promising guys; maybe he'll sign with us on the cheap cause he wants play for a SB contender. I don't care if he's as old as Methusala (?sp) if we can give us 1 more good year.

On the other hand, let's all pray for Terry Glenn & light a few candles.
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
I agree with Wade (except the part about losing Glenn) about our WR's. I think the need we have at that position is to insure our future; not that we can't compete/succeed now with the receivers we have. I would so love to have one or two of our existing young guys blossom into our future receivers.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
LeonDixson;2070596 said:
I agree with Wade (except the part about losing Glenn) about our WR's. I think the need we have at that position is to insure our future; not that we can't compete/succeed now with the receivers we have. I would so love to have one or two of our existing young guys blossom into our future receivers.

I think the plan is to get in position to trade up for a WR in the draft next year. The WR draft class next year is way better than it was this year.

That is why I think we traded for extra 3s and 4s for next year, so we have ammo to move up to get "a wow receiver".
 
Top