theogt
Surrealist
- Messages
- 45,846
- Reaction score
- 5,912
Player A: 5 INTs, 57 Tackles, 21 PDsInmanRoshi;2076218 said:Player A: 2 INT's, 0 FF, 1 Fumble Recovery, 0 Sacks
Player B: 3 INT's, 0 FF, 0 Fumble Recovery, 1 Sack.
Player A is our Roy Williams, paid All Pro money to make game changing plays.
Player B is Chris Crocker ... the Dolphins just got him off the NFL Free Agent bargain bin a week before the draft for 1 year, $1.5 million contract after the Falcons released him. (And unlike Roy, Crocker is actually a pretty nice coverage safety who covers a pretty good amount of ground). Who's getting more bang for the buck?
It doesn't bother you that Roy Williams isn't playing noticablly better than a guy who was just released from the 4-12 Falcons?
You can put a lot of weight into tackles .. I think they're pretty much a garbage stat completely subjective. Players can get a tackle credit for just standing near a pile. Besides, I don't consider a "tackle" a positive play when all it means is you managed to trip up a guy after he just scorched you for a 20 yard pass.
Player B: 4 INTs, 50 Tackles, 14 PDs
One player was the 5th overall pick in the draft and the other went completely undrafted.
Player A is Roderick Hood and Player B is Terence Newman. Who would you rather have?
Looking at those statistics alone for judging secondary is just ignorant.
I'm not defending Roy here, but if you're going to criticize a player, at least don't be stupid about it.