DMN Blog: Football Outsiders: Are Tony Romo's red zone troubles a trend?

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,630
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
1:35 PM Fri, Sep 26, 2008 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Tim MacMahon http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips

http://cowboysblog.***BANNED-URL***/NS_16stockJS-thumb-250x134.jpg

Bill Barnwell, a contributing editor at footballoutsiders.com and one of the minds behind the must-read Pro Football Prospectus, will answer five Cowboys questions each week of the season using the FO data and methodologies. Here's the Week 4 edition:

1. Two of Tony Romo's three interceptions this season have come inside the 20. What kind of numbers has he put up in the red zone last season?
Last year, Romo wasn't great in the red zone. The Cowboys' DVOA when throwing the ball in the red zone was 18th in the league; when running the ball, it was fifth. This year, owing to the interceptions, they're 30th when throwing the ball and ninth when running the ball.

It's hard to say why that is. It's certainly not a reason to get on Romo, considering the team's ability to pick up long touchdowns.


2. Bradie James believes he's a Pro Bowl-caliber inside linebacker. What do the stats say?
There's no statistic we've seen that suggests James is anything but a very decent linebacker. Last year, he made 13.2% of his team's plays, 43rd amongst linebackers. He had 15 defeats, plays where he stopped a player from getting a first down on third or fourth down, stopped a player behind the line of scrimmage, forced a fumble, or intercepted the ball -- that's a good number, but certainly not an elite number. He had a Stop Rate -- the inverse of our Success Rate (which requires a team to gain 45 percent of the needed yardage on first down, 60 percent on second down, and 100 percent on third down) -- of 72%, which was 19th in the league; as a whole, though, he made his average tackle 3.4 yards away from the line of scrimmage, only 53rd amongst linebackers. In coverage, he succeeded 55% of the time, 28th in the league for linebackers, and the 6.3 yards they gained per pass were 54th.

That's a lot of stats, but the point is that none of them stand out as league-leading or Pro Bowl-worthy. James also has the benefit of being surrounded by a great defense, as opposed to someone like a DeMeco Ryans, who has a couple of elite defensive players and then a half-dozen awful ones to work with. Not every Cowboys defender gets to make the Pro Bowl.

3. You've mentioned that the Cowboys were atrocious covering tight ends last season. How do they rank in the key Football Outsiders statistical measures vs. tight ends this season?
They really struggled, but they had weird splits over the previous few seasons. They were 30th in 2007, 8th in 2006, but then 31st in 2005. Remember also that DVOA, the metric we're using to track this, is adjusted for opponent -- so blaming it on having to play Jeremy Shockey and Chris Cooley four times doesn't work.

That being said, they're back up to 12th this year. They've had some dramatically disparate performances against tight ends. In Week 1, Kellen Winslow caught five of six passes to him, with all five being "successful" plays (meeting the requirements for yardage on specific downs explained above).

In Week 2, L.J. Smith caught only one pass of three, and none were successful, while Brent Celek was one for one.

Last week, Donald Lee caught all five passes thrown to him; four of them picked up the required yardage to be successful.

So, in other words, they're 12th, but I wouldn't be too thrilled about their performance so far, considering tight ends have been successful almost constantly.

4. Wade Phillips made sure everybody knew that Adam "Pacman" Jones wasn't to blame for Donald Driver's 50-yard reception, not so subtly pointing the finger at Ken Hamlin. How has Hamlin performed in pass coverage as a Cowboy?
Not bad, although a lot of the data we have is colored by the fact that he's across from Roy Williams. Hamlin was only targeted on 7% of his team's throws last year, 35th in the league; Williams was the second-most targeted player in the league.

He's succeeded 45% of the time, which is 53rd in the league, but those passes only allowed a very respectable 6.3 yards per attempt. I think Hamlin's a very solid guy in coverage, especially at keeping stuff in front of him. With Williams out, though, any excuses for not being an excellent safety are out the window -- if Hamlin's really a Pro Bowler, this is when he has to show it.

5. What's a matchup against the Commanders that should worry Dallas fans?
I think it has to be Chris Cooley versus Patrick Watkins. In his two games against the Cowboys last year, Cooley had 13 catches for 131 yards and a touchdown. If the Cowboys keep Watkins away from the line of scrimmage, they're going to have to deal with Clinton Portis and the Skins' impressive offensive line; either way, there's going to be a bad matchup in there somewhere.
 

FCBarca

New Member
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
0
Yeah, the Cooley factor concerns me a bit.

We'll see if the Romo 'concern' with the redzone trouble escalates this weekend
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Oh now the media will be all over Romo cause of his 2 red zone problems. Well at least that won't least long since I expect him (along with Garrett) to be a little more aware about throwing the ball away or putting only where one of our WRs can get it.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,291
Reaction score
63,974
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
WoodysGirl;2287472 said:
5. What's a matchup against the Commanders that should worry Dallas fans?
I think it has to be Chris Cooley versus Patrick Watkins. In his two games against the Cowboys last year, Cooley had 13 catches for 131 yards and a touchdown. If the Cowboys keep Watkins away from the line of scrimmage, they're going to have to deal with Clinton Portis and the Skins' impressive offensive line; either way, there's going to be a bad matchup in there somewhere.
Campbell has gotten better at finding Cooley when he can't find an open receiver. Cooley will get his touches. The key for preventing Cooley from being a successful weapon will be to limit his receptions to just anything passed to him underneath and tackle well.

Regardless of the matchup, whether it's Watkins or Henry, they must stop Cooley from converting those short dump off passes into long gains. This is where he's most dangerous, in my opinion. Contain him, apply enough pressure on Campbell and I see the Washington passing attack being very ineffective.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
4. Wade Phillips made sure everybody knew that Adam "Pacman" Jones wasn't to blame for Donald Driver's 50-yard reception, not so subtly pointing the finger at Ken Hamlin. How has Hamlin performed in pass coverage as a Cowboy?
Not bad, although a lot of the data we have is colored by the fact that he's across from Roy Williams. Hamlin was only targeted on 7% of his team's throws last year, 35th in the league; Williams was the second-most targeted player in the league.

He's succeeded 45% of the time, which is 53rd in the league, but those passes only allowed a very respectable 6.3 yards per attempt. I think Hamlin's a very solid guy in coverage, especially at keeping stuff in front of him. With Williams out, though, any excuses for not being an excellent safety are out the window -- if Hamlin's really a Pro Bowler, this is when he has to show it.

Hamlin might get exposed
 

RainMan

Makin' It Rain
Messages
3,125
Reaction score
0
I'm surprised metrics would suggest tight ends have been successful against us this year. Outside of Winslow's TD, can't say I even recall a single catch a tight end has made against us.
 

cowboys2233

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1,983
DaBoys4Life;2287564 said:
Hamlin might get exposed


The only one getting exposed is Pervert Cooley, on his lame *** blog. What a sick monkey he is.
 

Don Corleone

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,485
Reaction score
4,597
RainMan;2287605 said:
I'm surprised metrics would suggest tight ends have been successful against us this year. Outside of Winslow's TD, can't say I even recall a single catch a tight end has made against us.


The article says we're better this year...ranked 12th in the league against tight ends.
 

dboyz

Active Member
Messages
819
Reaction score
101
It would be nice if Watkins could get an interception (covering Cooley).
 

cowboys2233

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1,983
dboyz;2287670 said:
It would be nice if Watkins could get an interception (covering Cooley).


He'll be lucky getting out of the game without contracting some sort of crotch fungus from covering that perverted sicko, Cooley.
 

Faerluna

I'm Complicated
Messages
5,144
Reaction score
6
cowboys2233;2287758 said:
He'll be lucky getting out of the game without contracting some sort of crotch fungus from covering that perverted sicko, Cooley.

Just for the sake of argument, you really believe that because he posted pictures that included his johnson (intentional or not is irrelevant) that he is a pervert sicko with venereal disease?

I'm sure if some cheerleader posted a picture of their routine book and happened to have a money shot in there you'd be too busy unzipping your pants to comment.

Give it a rest already.
 

Homer

Active Member
Messages
317
Reaction score
156
About Romo, I would call his red zone deficiencies more of a weakness than a trend.

At least right now I would. Hopefully with correct playcalling and great awareness of the defense, he will be able to become more successful.
 

Ender

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,970
Reaction score
515
5. What's a matchup against the Commanders that should worry Dallas fans?
I think it has to be Chris Cooley versus Patrick Watkins. In his two games against the Cowboys last year, Cooley had 13 catches for 131 yards and a touchdown. If the Cowboys keep Watkins away from the line of scrimmage, they're going to have to deal with Clinton Portis and the Skins' impressive offensive line; either way, there's going to be a bad matchup in there somewhere.

Patrick Watkins isn't going to be guarding Chris Cooley, in our sub package there's only one safety and they flank Cooley out a lot. So what is this guy talking about. This is a reason that these people dont make since.
 

FLcowboy

When Jerry, when?
Messages
4,061
Reaction score
260
sago1;2287495 said:
Oh now the media will be all over Romo cause of his 2 red zone problems. Well at least that won't least long since I expect him (along with Garrett) to be a little more aware about throwing the ball away or putting only where one of our WRs can get it.

Romo's throw to T.O. for a touchdown in the redzone against Philly (I think it was Philly) was a perfect example of a play that nobody was going to catch the ball except T.O.

That's the kind of play that needs to be pursued, instead of the crossing routes trying to confuse the defense. All that does is put a lot of people into the middle of the end zone.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Ender;2287942 said:
Patrick Watkins isn't going to be guarding Chris Cooley, in our sub package there's only one safety and they flank Cooley out a lot. So what is this guy talking about. This is a reason that these people dont make since.

We won't be playing single-safety or dime defenses every down, you know. In our base defense, the strong safety is almost always either man-to-man on the tight end or playing the deep safety on the tight end's side.

The only way Patrick Watkins never covers Cooley is if Watkins never plays.
 
Top