Alexander;2782018 said:
You need to practice this, because you aren't picking one here. How many people truly had an issue with him playing through the rib injury? Five, six out of a forum of hundreds? Instead of addressing those, you went off on a whining rant here about how poor Tony Romo faces undue criticism and even extrapolated it to your belief that he'd still catch it even if he was in Brady's position. That's a stretch and you know it. Why? Because he's a favorite of yours as you stated.
Thanks, but Randy and Paula both think my argument was valid. Paula said I was a Forum God. Like it or not, I'll be back next week.
There were more than 5-6 posters who had an issue with the commitment Romo showed after the PHI loss. It's not clear to me why you think I should have addressed the majority who agree with me that those issues were stupid.
It's a whining rant now to acknowledge that Romo gets criticized unfairly? Even in a context with several fair points of criticism of his game? I'd hope, Alexander, that you realize there a posters on this board capable of both liking a player and criticizing him. Or of understanding the difference between valid criticism of a player they like and invalid. I'm not going to go round and round with you about a hypothetical, but, yes, I believe that if Romo were in Brady's position, there'd be more than one thread on this board on the topic, and they'd be more than one page, each. That meets my definition of 'catching it' even if it doesn't meet yours.