News: DMN: Gosselin: Why Tony Romo isn't even close to Hall of Fame-worthy

NewsBot

New Member
Messages
111,281
Reaction score
2,947
*** Message was removed by demand from DMN ***
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
Tony Romo is the all-time leading passer of the Cowboys.

He has been more prolific in his career than either Troy Aikman and Roger Staubach. Those two local quarterbacking legends have busts in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Does Romo belong in their company?

That’s the question I’ve been getting asked on a more regular basis as Romo, now 36, gets older. What are his chances for the Hall of Fame?

There’s a simple answer. Win a Super Bowl and get into the discussion.

Sixty-nine percent of the 303 Hall of Famers won championship. The selection committee, of which I am a member, seems to favor candidates with rings. That’s why the five-time NFL champion Green Bay Packers of the 1960s have 11 players enshrined. That’s why the four-time champion Pittsburgh Steelers of the 1970s and the three-time champion Cleveland Browns of the 1950s have nine players enshrined apiece.

***large snip***


Listen to Rick Gosselin at 10:50 a.m. Tuesdays on Sportsradio 1310 AM/96.7 FM The Ticket with Norm Hitzges and Donovan Lewis, and follow @RickGosselinDMN on Twitter.

Continue reading...

I truly do love it when a mediot is consistent with the utter and complete destruction of his credibility. Media members like JJT, make it difficult because from time to time I'll read something from him just because ever now and then he put's out something worthy of reading. I don't recall the last time Goose was listen or read-worthy...so thank you Goose; you have made planning my Cowboys-reading-time so much easier.
 

ChooChoo73

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
603
Agree with the conclusion that he is not hall of fame worthy. Not a fan of the writer but i think it's farfetched to think Romo is even close to that accomplishment.
 

85Cowboy85

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,519
Reaction score
1,664
The headline is way worse then the article. It's the classic clickbait formula.

Goose doesn't even really give us his own opinion on Romo. He just points out the most quarterback in the hall already have championships. This is something everybody who follows the hall of fame already knew.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
PS: I love this topic. Some many viewpoints.

There's just something for everyone.....Gos haters, Romo love/haters, and history buffs.

Isn't that special?! :D
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
While it's just another example of the low IQ "count the ringz" argument that populates the minds of the media (and many of the lesser posters in here as well), there's nothing offensive about the viewpoint. The voters can put anyone they want in the Hall of Fame... there's no standard to reach. If they want to make it a winners only club, that's fine by me. The Hall of Fame being a place where only the actual best players got in went up in smoke long ago.
 

PA Cowboy Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,354
Reaction score
51,350
I'm not saying Romo is better then Troy, but I am saying Troy wouldn't have taken any team Romo has played on to a Super Bowl imo. That goes for Smith and Irvin aswell. Hell I'll add Joe Montana to

The 2007 and 2014 teams I believe they would.
 
Top