DMN JJT Blog: Cowboys will go as far as Romo leads

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
6:02 AM Fri, Jun 19, 2009 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Jean-Jacques Taylor/Columnist E-mail News tips

We've all known the Cowboys will go only as far as Tony Romo leads them. Maybe, as he enters his fourth seasons as a starter, he finally understands that.

If you listen to his comments earlier this week at the Cowboys' final off-season mini-camp, it sounds like Romo's figured out that good isn't good enough if winning a championship is the goal - and that's the standard for the Dallas Cowboys.

These days, he's talking about being a better leader. Remember, he scoffed at the notion a few months ago. The other day Romo talked about pushing himself to get in better condition to help him perform just as well in December as he does in September, October and November.

When Romo talks about the importance of protecting the ball, it's an indication he realizes 21 turnovers - seven lost fumbles and 14 interceptions - won't enable the Cowboys to end their wretched streak of 12 seasons without a playoff win.

When he talks about winning games without flashy plays, you should take that as indication he's maturing as a quarterback.

It sounds to me like the cocky quarterback has been humbled.


Don't misunderstand, I admire Romo's belief that every play can be turned into a touchdown. I like the emotion and passion he displays when he plays.

If we're honest, though, it's easy to see how and why he regressed. In less than a year, Romo went from a fairly anonymous backup quarterback to a Pro Bowler who became the face of America's team.

Did I mention the six-year contract worth $67 million, including $30 million in guarantees.

The money. The fame. The success. The high profile.

Who wouldn't lose their mind?

Without Bill Parcells grinding on him the last two years and challenging him to be the best he can be every play, Romo has regressed.

No doubt.

See, this isn't about stats. For a quarterback, stats never tell the whole story. And when you play for an offensive coordinator who loves to throw the ball, stats will never tell the entire story.

"I can give you some stats that showed he had a better year last year, but that doesn't count. We didn't have a better year because of the winning," Jerry said. "We all know it didn't go to his satisfaction last year on an individual or team basis. I think you're seeing go to work and do something about it.

"He's just trying to take care of business. There's too much at stake. There's too many people trying to get the same thing. Any of us are naïve, if we don't understand the challenge it takes to win and be a champion because there are a lot of pitfalls."

Romo has immense talent. No one has ever doubted that.

We've all seen him do some amazing things on the field, but for the Cowboys to win in December when the games are most important and in the playoffs, when legacies are forged, Romo must play better.

It's that simple.

The owner, though, is not surprised at the metamorphosis that appears to be taking place.

"What I see is him addressing ways to improve. If he was at a different stage of his career, he might be worried about his health or whether his arm is live enough," Jerry said. "That tells me his arrow is going up. His entire attitude in every respect is good.
"When you have that attitude for improvement and you're willing to address it, you get better. Anyone who's underestimating his mind on his responsibility as quarterback is underestimating him."

Words alone won't get it done. We know that.

Still, Romo's moving in the right direction. The way you fix is a problem is admitting you have one. It sounds like he understands that now, but we won't know for sure until the season begins.

It's one thing to talk about change in the calm of the summer and quite another to do it during the heat and pressure of the season.

http://jacquestaylorblog.***BANNED-URL***/archives/2009/06/cowboys-will-go-as-far-as-romo.html
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
The article was right about one thing words alone will not get it done and Romo alone will not get it done. This team needs to do a better job in protection and become more balanced in their attack. For the Cowboys to get to where they want to be it is going to take a team effort to accomplish it. Romo needs to lead the way but others must step up as well.
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
the December thing is somewhat laughable to me. They had the Giants 2007 playoff game on the NFL network the other day and Romo and Barber were the best players on the field. He made play after play after play....especially behind an OL that became leakier as the game progressed. Had the DEFENSE not given up a TD with under 2 mins to play in the 1st half....had Fasano not have a TD bounce off his hands...had Crayton not have a potential TD bounce off his hands....had Crayton not stopped on a route...notice a trend here....Romo played his butt off....had ANY of those things I just mentioned took place...the Cowboys would have gone to the Super Bowl that year. But those things did not happen, and the reason they did not happen had NOTHING to do with Romo.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,205
bbailey423;2816222 said:
the December thing is somewhat laughable to me. They had the Giants 2007 playoff game on the NFL network the other day and Romo and Barber were the best players on the field. He made play after play after play....especially behind an OL that became leakier as the game progressed. Had the DEFENSE not given up a TD with under 2 mins to play in the 1st half....had Fasano not have a TD bounce off his hands...had Crayton not have a potential TD bounce off his hands....had Crayton not stopped on a route...notice a trend here....Romo played his butt off....had ANY of those things I just mentioned took place...the Cowboys would have gone to the Super Bowl that year. But those things did not happen, and the reason they did not happen had NOTHING to do with Romo.


yep


IMO Romos biggest blunder as a QB was the Pitt game last year but everyone mentions the playoffs and puts it on him everytime.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
bbailey423;2816222 said:
the December thing is somewhat laughable to me. They had the Giants 2007 playoff game on the NFL network the other day and Romo and Barber were the best players on the field. He made play after play after play....especially behind an OL that became leakier as the game progressed. Had the DEFENSE not given up a TD with under 2 mins to play in the 1st half....had Fasano not have a TD bounce off his hands...had Crayton not have a potential TD bounce off his hands....had Crayton not stopped on a route...notice a trend here....Romo played his butt off....had ANY of those things I just mentioned took place...the Cowboys would have gone to the Super Bowl that year. But those things did not happen, and the reason they did not happen had NOTHING to do with Romo.


Yep. (Only Crayton didn't stop on that route). Romo played well in that Giants game. It was the Giants second-half pressure that we couldn't handle.

I don't get why our protection gets a pass by our fans. The OL wasn't a good unit before Romo got here, and protection's been responsible or at least heavily involved in the major recent failures of this team in 07 and 08. It hurt us v. BAL and PHI at the end of the year last year, and it caused us to lose a home playoff game in what should have been a Superbowl season in 07. Protection got Romo hurt v. AZ. It lost us Matt McBriar in that same game. We lack depth and even our starters make mental mistakes. With the weapons we have, we've had key blitz pick-up meltdowns. Maybe our blitz protection is better on paper when you compare us to other teams, I don't know, but we've paid a heavy price for it breaking down at key moments.

This is an area of common ground for me and our usual group of reactionary whiners. I say we all get together, hug it out, and make this thread a long ***** session about our offensive line. Who's with me?
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
Idgit;2816291 said:
Yep. (Only Crayton didn't stop on that route). Romo played well in that Giants game. It was the Giants second-half pressure that we couldn't handle.

I don't get why our protection gets a pass by our fans. The OL wasn't a good unit before Romo got here, and protection's been responsible or at least heavily involved in the major recent failures of this team in 07 and 08. It hurt us v. BAL and PHI at the end of the year last year, and it caused us to lose a home playoff game in what should have been a Superbowl season in 07. Protection got Romo hurt v. AZ. It lost us Matt McBriar in that same game. We lack depth and even our starters make mental mistakes. With the weapons we have, we've had key blitz pick-up meltdowns. Maybe our blitz protection is better on paper when you compare us to other teams, I don't know, but we've paid a heavy price for it breaking down at key moments.

This is an area of common ground for me and our usual group of reactionary whiners. I say we all get together, hug it out, and make this thread a long ***** session about our offensive line. Who's with me?

Boom.

Exactly why I wish the zone had a film section where we could watch games and people can see exactly how often Romo's pocket breaksdown and he's forced to make guys miss. Thats why he always 'feels' pressure because it always seems to be there. Thats why I'm glad we've got two TEs that can block, because our guys are going to need some help.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Apollo Creed;2816295 said:
Boom.

Exactly why I wish the zone had a film section where we could watch games and people can see exactly how often Romo's pocket breaksdown and he's forced to make guys miss. Thats why he always 'feels' pressure because it always seems to be there. Thats why I'm glad we've got two TEs that can block, because our guys are going to need some help.

Who was it that blew the pickup in AZ that lost us the game and the pro-bowl punter? It was a back, wasn't it? I can't remember.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
Idgit;2816306 said:
Who was it that blew the pickup in AZ that lost us the game and the pro-bowl punter? It was a back, wasn't it? I can't remember.
Deon Anderson's whiff cost us Romo for 3 games. Bruce reed changing players at the last second cost us the game and McBriar. I think the player was Tony Curtis who let the Cardinal come untouched on the blocked punt.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Rampage;2816310 said:
Deon Anderson's whiff cost us Romo for 3 games. Bruce reed changing players at the last second cost us the game and McBriar. I think the player was Tony Curtis who let the Cardinal come untouched on the blocked punt.

Yeah. Thanks. I was thinking TE but knew it wasn't Bennett or people'd still be talking about it.
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
JJT, the main reason for Romo's "regression" last year was his hand injury. Ever try throwing a football with a brace on your finger? Beyond that, do you really think that the finger has all of it's strength back right away after the brace comes off? IMO he was never fully healthy last year after that injury.

I agree that he needs to show better leadership qualities. I would love to see him grab an OL or two by the facemask and tell them it they can't man up and block their guy, then they should get off the field and let someone play who can. Same thing with a WR or two.

bbailey423;2816222 said:
the December thing is somewhat laughable to me. They had the Giants 2007 playoff game on the NFL network the other day and Romo and Barber were the best players on the field. He made play after play after play....especially behind an OL that became leakier as the game progressed. Had the DEFENSE not given up a TD with under 2 mins to play in the 1st half....had Fasano not have a TD bounce off his hands...had Crayton not have a potential TD bounce off his hands....had Crayton not stopped on a route...notice a trend here....Romo played his butt off....had ANY of those things I just mentioned took place...the Cowboys would have gone to the Super Bowl that year. But those things did not happen, and the reason they did not happen had NOTHING to do with Romo.
I couldn't agree more. I posted virtually the same thing a week or so ago. How people use that game to claim he chokes in the playoffs is beyond comprehension.

CATCH17;2816230 said:
yep


IMO Romos biggest blunder as a QB was the Pitt game last year but everyone mentions the playoffs and puts it on him everytime.

I wish I could do better searches for old posts. It was either Brad Sham or Babe Laufenburg who broke that play down and made a convincing case that Romo was not at fault. I tried to find the post made sometime during the week or so after the Pitt game, but couldn't find it.

Idgit;2816291 said:
Yep. (Only Crayton didn't stop on that route). Romo played well in that Giants game. It was the Giants second-half pressure that we couldn't handle.

I don't get why our protection gets a pass by our fans. The OL wasn't a good unit before Romo got here, and protection's been responsible or at least heavily involved in the major recent failures of this team in 07 and 08. It hurt us v. BAL and PHI at the end of the year last year, and it caused us to lose a home playoff game in what should have been a Superbowl season in 07. Protection got Romo hurt v. AZ. It lost us Matt McBriar in that same game. We lack depth and even our starters make mental mistakes. With the weapons we have, we've had key blitz pick-up meltdowns. Maybe our blitz protection is better on paper when you compare us to other teams, I don't know, but we've paid a heavy price for it breaking down at key moments.

This is an area of common ground for me and our usual group of reactionary whiners. I say we all get together, hug it out, and make this thread a long ***** session about our offensive line. Who's with me?

Bingo. We have to stop recruiting our O-linemen from the Tiajuana school for matadors.
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Idgit;2816291 said:
Yep. (Only Crayton didn't stop on that route). Romo played well in that Giants game. It was the Giants second-half pressure that we couldn't handle.

I don't get why our protection gets a pass by our fans. The OL wasn't a good unit before Romo got here, and protection's been responsible or at least heavily involved in the major recent failures of this team in 07 and 08. It hurt us v. BAL and PHI at the end of the year last year, and it caused us to lose a home playoff game in what should have been a Superbowl season in 07. Protection got Romo hurt v. AZ. It lost us Matt McBriar in that same game. We lack depth and even our starters make mental mistakes. With the weapons we have, we've had key blitz pick-up meltdowns. Maybe our blitz protection is better on paper when you compare us to other teams, I don't know, but we've paid a heavy price for it breaking down at key moments.

This is an area of common ground for me and our usual group of reactionary whiners. I say we all get together, hug it out, and make this thread a long ***** session about our offensive line. Who's with me?

The crazy thing is we still haven't addressed the O Line. How many guys did we bring in? Brewster, Islander, who else? It seems like we're going with the status quo in an area that could use improvement. Maybe the assumption is that Flo and Kosier will be 100% healthy and that will make the difference.
 

BIGDen

Dr. Freakasaurus
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
902
bbailey423;2816222 said:
the December thing is somewhat laughable to me. They had the Giants 2007 playoff game on the NFL network the other day and Romo and Barber were the best players on the field. He made play after play after play....especially behind an OL that became leakier as the game progressed. Had the DEFENSE not given up a TD with under 2 mins to play in the 1st half....had Fasano not have a TD bounce off his hands...had Crayton not have a potential TD bounce off his hands....had Crayton not stopped on a route...notice a trend here....Romo played his butt off....had ANY of those things I just mentioned took place...the Cowboys would have gone to the Super Bowl that year. But those things did not happen, and the reason they did not happen had NOTHING to do with Romo.

Amen!!! I read so much crap about him faltering in the clutch and think that people missed that HUGE game. Everybody needs a scapegoat, and the QB is an easy one. Romo is not perfect, but he is so much better than most QBs in this league. Play D and protect him a little is all we ask. Romo has not been the problem.
 

MONT17

New Member
Messages
3,269
Reaction score
0
Yea I love how Jerrys Kids talk about how poor the oline has been for Romo, then give Jerry an A for this past offseason...


Good luck with the lookout blocking scheme
 

Real1st

Nikola Tesla
Messages
6,060
Reaction score
1,599
MONT17;2816418 said:
Yea I love how Jerrys Kids talk about how poor the oline has been for Romo, then give Jerry an A for this past offseason...


Good luck with the lookout blocking scheme

Co sign to the fullest. Nothing was done at all to sure up the offensive line.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Boyzmamacita;2816381 said:
The crazy thing is we still haven't addressed the O Line. How many guys did we bring in? Brewster, Islander, who else? It seems like we're going with the status quo in an area that could use improvement. Maybe the assumption is that Flo and Kosier will be 100% healthy and that will make the difference.

I think that's the assumption. I was/am a fan of Hudson Houck, too, but I don't understand why he doesn't get more heat for some of the projection breakdowns. There were a couple of notable injuries already mentioned. There was the embarrassing Procter play when he didn't get out of his stance. There was the max-protection failure for 2 and half quarters in the last game at Texas stadium against a great BAL defense in what might have been the biggest game of the year other than PHI II. These are high-profile failures, yet the offseason is wasted talking about stupid TO-Romo-Witten disputes and Tony Romo choking in big games and lacking leadership. Makes no sense.

JJT, TMac. You guys read the board. Do us a favor and bring a little attention to a real issue on offense for a change. Make yourselves look smart in front of the hardcore fans. It's a gimme.
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
Idgit;2816662 said:
JJT, TMac. You guys read the board. Do us a favor and bring a little attention to a real issue on offense for a change. Make yourselves look smart in front of the hardcore fans. It's a gimme.

If only they would do so. I know Adams was playing hurt and was at an extreme disadvantage most of the year; and of course the injury to Kosier was devastating. But why don't we have decent backups.

The o'line needs to be called out and embarrassed. IMO they were just as culpable last year as the special teams unit.

I don't blame Houck for the mess yet. He wasn't here when most of the backups were drafted and it's hard to make a good impression when 40% of your unit is in sick bay. Bringing in Holland was a good move and Houck probably had something to do with that. I want to see if he can whip 'em into shape this year before I turn on him.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Apollo Creed;2816295 said:
Boom.

Exactly why I wish the zone had a film section where we could watch games and people can see exactly how often Romo's pocket breaksdown and he's forced to make guys miss. Thats why he always 'feels' pressure because it always seems to be there. Thats why I'm glad we've got two TEs that can block, because our guys are going to need some help.

We've employed two-tight end sets last year and did it plenty against the Steelers. Garrett also employed plenty of shot-gun. The fact is, Garrett couldn't get it done.

Why don't people get the reason this offense was ineffective is because Garrett had his huge OL playing backwards all the time, and the Cowboys didn't have an effective play-action pass to keep the secondary guessing? There is a reason other defenses laughed at how predictable our offense was. Coupled by the fact that Garrett kept trying to go long with long-developing patterns, it was a disaster.

Our offense was most effective when Romo was making plays on his feet, because the talent of the offense took over and coaching was minimized.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Our protection sucks because we are in pass-protection all the time, though we have one of the biggest, if not biggest offensive lines in the league. We ran time-based running schemes which is totally against the very nature of our offense, instead of playing smash-mouth up-front.

Hudson Houck doesn't call the schemes, doesn't shorten routes to keep defensive pressure off, doesn't choose when to run and when to pass. Hudson Houck plays smash-mouth football. Garrett chose not to, and his play-calling was more akin tyo Mike Martz, where the offense racks up yardage, but the QB gets killed.

The fact that they got Kitna makes me cringe even more, because it seems that the team isn't going to change the very philosophy that caused it to stink...
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
If Tony Romo wasn't here and couldn't avoid the rush, this offense would be a disaster which is a reflection on how bad Garrett's coaching is... hell, we saw it last year...

With all the additional talent on this team, the offense should have naturally dropped, but to look as pathetic as it did, even with our two back-ups, is just unacceptable... No shortening of the routes, no roll-outs by the QB, no quick slants to keep pressure off, consistently abandoning the run when it is working is all on Garrett..
 
Top