DMN JJT Blog: Jerry says T.O. had to go for others to thrive

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
11:26 AM Thu, Jun 18, 2009 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Jean-Jacques Taylor/Columnist E-mail News tips

Now, this isn't breaking news about T.O., but I feel like I finally got as much of the whole truth about why Jerry got rid of T.O. than at any other time this offseason.

Maybe, it was because there were only four of us talking to him, and he was gobbling down chili cheese fries and a grilled chicken sandwich at Cowboys Stadium, while waiting for Larry King to arrive.

The topic popped up because I asked Jerry whether these Cowboys were more talented than last year's Cowboys, even though he's removed T.O., Adam Jones, Greg Ellis and Tank Johnson from the roster.

Jerry said he thought the Cowboys would be more talented this year because players such as Martellus Bennett, Miles Austin, Sam Hurd and Anthony Spencer would be better than last year, making the team better collectively.

That's how he wound up talking about T.O.

"If I look at who's going to be on the field, if we don't have to make adjustments because of injuries, we'll be a more talented team," Jerry said. "When I look at what we've substituted in there for the players who have left, I don't think we have stepped back in our talent at all.

"Frankly, the most basic reason that I changed my mind regarding Terrell Owens was the ability to maximize the potential of Roy Williams, Miles Austin, Sam Hurd, the running backs and our tight ends. That was the most fundamental thing."

"We wanted to take advantage of where we are with the talent we have on offense. You shouldn't have Terrell unless he's a dominant part of your offense or you're trying to put him in that kind of role in your offense.

"If for any reason you want to come off of that and spread it around or use different parts of your offense, then you shouldn't have him because that's not the best use of having Terrell Owens on your team.

He certainly had the respect of the defense. You have to maximize that, if he's on your team."

Yes, T.O. had issues with Jason Garrett and Tony Romo. And he certainly didn't have a good year by his standards, so Jerry had to wonder if T.O.'s age was finally starting to catch up with him.

But the bottom line is that enough people convinced Jerry that getting all everyone else more involved in the offense would make Tony Romo and the Cowboys better. In a few months, we'll find out whether it was a good decision.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
"If for any reason you want to come off of that and spread it around or use different parts of your offense, then you shouldn't have him because that's not the best use of having Terrell Owens on your team.

He certainly had the respect of the defense. You have to maximize that, if he's on your team."

This only makes sense if Terrell Owens is well, Terrell Owens. He was slipping last year and couldn't beat press coverage even when average corners like Rod Hood were on him.

The problem was that we didn't maximize any of the benefit of his reputation. Williams didn't play well, we forgot about the backs and Bennett in the last two or three games. Now it will have to be earned.
 
Messages
3,013
Reaction score
586
Jerry does a decent enough job of spinning what he's saying, but it's clear to anybody what he really means is "If you have T.O. on your team, and you throw the ball to anybody else at any time, he's going to moan and complain."

We'll see if we're better off without him, but I happen to think we will be.
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,516
Reaction score
9,346
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I can respect Jerry's answer. He is spot on in reference to spreading the ball around not being a good formula with T.O. in the mix. (Thought I'd stick with the chemistry theme.) ;)

And Alexander your point about Dallas not maximizing on the benefit of T.O.'s reputation is an astute obeservation as well. You are correct that Williams didn't play well nor did he have plays run for him that maximize his skillset. As you said, the backs were forgotten about and Bennett wasn't fully used until the end of the season. All those things fall back on Jason Garrett. Hopefully he bounces back from his poor season.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
slick325;2815148 said:
And Alexander your point about Dallas not maximizing on the benefit of T.O.'s reputation is an astute obeservation as well. You are correct that Williams didn't play well nor did he have plays run for him that maximize his skillset. As you said, the backs were forgotten about and Bennett wasn't fully used until the end of the season. All those things fall back on Jason Garrett. Hopefully he bounces back from his poor season.

It is not just on Garrett. He can only design the plays and prioritize the targets. Naturally, you are going to create the flow to go to your best player (or who you think your best player is), that was Owens. He cannot make the QB throw the ball. He also can't make up his mind for him when he is under pressure.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
I like the talks of spreading the ball around

Jerry finally expounded on "Romo-friendly"
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
McCordsville Cowboy;2815154 said:
If Roy gets hurt, we are screwed.

if romo gets hurt.
if witten gets hurt.
if ware gets hurt.
if newman gets hurt.

face it - losing a key player...hurts.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
Alexander;2815152 said:
It is not just on Garrett. He can only design the plays and prioritize the targets. Naturally, you are going to create the flow to go to your best player (or who you think your best player is), that was Owens. He cannot make the QB throw the ball. He also can't make up his mind for him when he is under pressure.


Not true, entirely.

Get open, and do so quickly and effectively, routinely and you make the QBs mind up for them.


And I think that the idea of spreading the ball around and using more of the overall talent is always a better way to go about moving your offense than worrying about rather or not one of your players is getting enough attention.
 

CoCo

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
187
Nothing new here really. In kind of a back door way this could imply that Jerry is saying a team should make TO its total focus or get rid of him. That can be taken as a compliment or an insult to TO.

Most of the time when Jerry talks its all pretty meaningless jiggerish that only makes complete sense to him anyway. I had a boss that was just like him.

But from a pure talent perspective its stupid to suggest that Dallas is more talented in 2009 than 2008 because of the folks Jerry listed. The hope is that even as talent has decreased productivity will increase and I think that is a reasonable hypothesis given the obvious underachieving the team did last year.

Can this group pull it off? I'm hopeful, but not confident. It doesn't build my confidence to hear that Roy11 doesn't run all his routes hard or well. I know his fans think its an overreaction but that strikes me the same way as the early TO defenders who insisted all of his past was someone else's fault or totally fabricated.

Frankly, I don't much care if the Roy11 deal turns out to be good value for us. I don't live and die on that. What we need is an overall effective offense by whatever means it takes.

My hope is probably more in Romo to Witten & Martellus, the 3 headed running game with enough WR connections to keep it all balanced. Crayton will be a solid complementary factor. Austin can play a complementary role too if he stays healthy.

Said another way, as much as I would like Roy11 to be a stud I don't think he has to be for us to succeed. And I probably lean in the direction that he won't be. But maybe he will.
 

Duane

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,063
Reaction score
413
The success of the offense lines squarely on the offensive line. If they are a solid, cohesive unit we'll be able to run the ball, stay in short yardage situations and be able to exploit the mismatches we have with our TEs and WR Roy Williams.
 

CoCo

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
187
McCordsville Cowboy;2815154 said:
If Roy gets hurt, we are screwed.

Just my opinion, but I don't think that's true. And mostly because I don't think this offense will START with him. I think it will START with a talented QB, the TE's, and the running game. And that those units will be strong enough to get the defense's initial foocus. If that happens, I think between Roy, Austin & Crayton we'll have enough WR firepower to then go that direction.

Despite the fact that we gave up a 1st & 3rd and $9million annually I actually don't look at Roy11 as one of the centerpieces of this offense, certainly not like TO was.

If he has to carry the load, I have serious questions as to whether he can (unlike his big fans). But I think he can be a dangerous component in a multifaceted offense.

That may mean we overpaid for the guy, but that's not my highest priority at this point anymore than I am crying over TO's dead cap money. Its spilt milk. Over and done.
 

CoCo

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
187
Duane;2815186 said:
The success of the offense lines squarely on the offensive line. If they are a solid, cohesive unit we'll be able to run the ball, stay in short yardage situations and be able to exploit the mismatches we have with our TEs and WR Roy Williams.

I failed to mention it in my earlier posts but I very much agree. Our success will be very limited if we don't get improved O-line play over last year.

I'm hoping Flo rebounds and that last year's subpar play was a result of his hand injury and the LG injuries. I'm hoping we stay healthy enough that the group can be good. Great I think is unrealistic, but good I think is achievable.

I'm also hoping the threat of Felix can keep the D from a consistent all-out rush.
 

ArmyCowboy

New Member
Messages
951
Reaction score
0
Translation:

T.O. is a royal pain in the butt. Unless he's able to perform at a Pro Bowl level, he isn't worth the aggrevation.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
ArmyCowboy;2815200 said:
Translation:

T.O. is a royal pain in the butt. Unless he's able to perform at a Pro Bowl level, he isn't worth the aggrevation.

Yes pretty much, if TO is on the team you better be willing to make him the focus of the offense if not things get rough. I do not deny the numbers he put up for Dallas but in the end we have nothing to show for it. If getting more players involved into the scheme helps this team win then I think we will be better off overall. The Move was made now we will see if it works
 

cobra

Salty *******
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
0
iceberg;2815162 said:
if romo gets hurt.
if witten gets hurt.
if ware gets hurt.
if newman gets hurt.

face it - losing a key player...hurts.

Exactly.

If Peyton gets hurt, Indy is screwed...
If Rivers...
If Brees...
Peterson...

You can go on and on.

What's the point of making the "If Roy gets hurt..." argument? That's true everywhere. What's the solution to that dilemma? Having 53 Pro Bowlers on your roster so that you never have to worry about injury? Not going to happen.

Hell, losing Kosier last year hurt us immensely.

Injuries can hurt a team. I'm glad people point out obvious **** like that in order to concern troll.
 
Top