unionjack8
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,441
- Reaction score
- 27,103
Well if Stephen says so, it MUST be true.........
In one particular regard.
That has little bearing on whether the team wins or loses.
On the side of the ball that delivered top-5 points/series performance last season.
That we think we might have improved with the hiring of another experienced coach to address a play calling situation the head coach did not like from the year before.
Somebody find me another emotional bridge to jump off; I feel like complaining about something and don't want to bother discriminating as to whether or not it's actually a problem.
We have hired 12 coaches over the past 2 seasons under "coach in training" and you are telling me there is no continuity problem?
Talk about bad arguments.......................I needed a good laugh today, so thank you.
So he addressed the situation by hiring someone who scored less points.
Ivy league stuff right there.
So he addressed the situation by hiring someone who scored less points.
Ivy league stuff right there.
Does Linehan call plays from the sideline or the booth?
You're welcome. If reading things out of context and then misinterpreting the things I say in context amuses you, that makes me happy, too. You seem stressed here recently, and I'm sure laughter makes things better.
Since this thread is about the offensive coaching staff, my continuity point was obviously in regards to the offense. But, for the record, that cherry-picked 12 coaches number includes changing over our defensive scheme with two different staffs which has entailed some significant turnover. I'd be interested to see the list of assistants we've turned over before deciding how much it likely mattered in the scheme of things. If we're talking Wes-Phillips for Mike-Pope stuff here, or adding another assistant OL coach to the roster, or adding another experienced by like Linehan to the staff, I can live with that. There's nothing magical about the words '12' or 'Cleveland' that should have you quaking in your Cowboy boots.
Seems like every coach that leaves has beef with Garrett
Hey. Here's a great idea. Let's bring the old Detroit Lions coaching staff to Dallas. They couldn't get it done there, maybe they can get it done in Dallas . . .
Watch Callahan leave, go to Cleveland or somewhere else, and they become a top 5 offense . . . .
Lets be real here....
We're already a top five offense in ppg.
Top 10 offenses in the NFL in 2013 per ESPN:
RK TEAM YDS YDS/G PASS P YDS/G RUSH R YDS/G PTS PTS/G
1 San Francisco 1004 334.7 550 183.3 454 151.3 63 21.0
2 Indianapolis 922 461.0 753 376.5 169 84.5 67 33.5
3 Denver 870 435.0 630 315.0 240 120.0 50 25.0
4 New Orleans 843 421.5 550 275.0 293 146.5 41 20.5
5 New England 739 369.5 441 220.5 298 149.0 59 29.5
6 Seattle 585 292.5 296 148.0 289 144.5 46 23.0
7 San Diego 577 288.5 316 158.0 261 130.5 44 22.0
8 Kansas City 513 513.0 363 363.0 150 150.0 44 44.0
9 Cincinnati 439 439.0 326 326.0 113 113.0 10 10.0
10 Carolina 325 325.0 232 232.0 93 93.0 10 10.0
11 Green Bay 281 281.0 157 157.0 124 124.0 20 20.0
12 Philadelphia 256 256.0 176 176.0 80 80.0 24 24.0
We weren't even a top 12 offense . . . .
I was thinking a Parcells in NY - God I can't believe I just made that comparison. Quick, where is the soap...
Now exactly what did I say? We are a top five offense in ppg.
Scored 439 points (27.4/g), 5th of 32 in the NFL. Allowed 432 points (27.0/g), 26th.
Differential of 7 points (0.4/g), 15th. Expected W-L: 8.2-7.8.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/dal/2013.htm
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that and to see the big problem.
Are you factoring the defensive and special touchdowns scored. I bet that average goes down a bit.
Are you factoring the defensive and special touchdowns scored. I bet that average goes down a bit.
Are you factoring the defensive and special touchdowns scored. I bet that average goes down a bit.
If Jones would let him interview, he would have his choice of a couple of open jobs.