News: DMN: What was behind the 'weirdness' of Tony Romo's postgame interview

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
I dont blame him one bit...tying to help the person that took your job while you're still capable of doing the same job is difficult.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Tim Cowlishaw made it seem like there was weirdness. He was the one asking the bigger picture (and possibly pot-stirring) questions and he is the one who wrote a pretty disrespectful article in the Dallas Morning News the next day because Romo didn't play along.
Cowlishaw was being a crybaby for not getting the answers he wanted. Romo just didn't take the bait.

In the article, Cowlishaw even went so far as to say Romo didn't improve his draft stock one single bit from that game.
He was coming after him in a condescending manner from multiple angles. Very petty.
Romo did the right thing in not feeding him any ammo.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I disagree. I think he's been a good sport about it
Of course he has.
The guy takes Dak out to dinner occasionally and even stays late in the film room with him at times.
He's absolutely been a good sport about it.

That doesn't mean he doesn't think he could be as good or better. But he understands the situation. It's not Dak's fault that he took the opportunity to shine.
 
Last edited:

_sturt_

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,398
Reaction score
4,304
I don't know if "weirdness" is the right term, but I perceived essentially the same tone to the dialogue each time a question was asked.

But having said that, I think most of us already got what is being explained in this column: Tony is above much of the line of questioning directed toward him Sunday. (No sarcasm in that... he really was/is.)

My only takeaway is that I wish media would stop being so overly presumptuous in saying what is going to happen. It's fine to opine about what's going to happen... but but but... just couch it in a context that admits there are still substantial variables in play.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Tim Cowlishaw made it seem like there was weirdness. He was the one asking the bigger picture (and possibly pot-stirring) questions and he is the one who wrote a pretty disrespectful article in the Dallas Morning News the next day because Romo didn't play along.
Cowlishaw was being a crybaby for not getting the answers he wanted. Romo just didn't take the bait.

In the article, Cowlishaw even went so far as to say Romo didn't improve his draft stock one single bit from that game.
He was coming after him in a condescending manner from multiple angles. Very petty.
Romo did the right thing in not feeding him any ammo.
Well, it's Cowlishaw, so there's that.. I can't find a more uninteresting columnist than him and Gosselin. Their articles are nothing, but petty click bait. Gosselin's only saving grace is that he votes for the HOF.
 
Top