BigStar
Stop chasing
- Messages
- 11,528
- Reaction score
- 17,081
Is that 18?
Can you list the 18 superstars that have been sidelined?
Is that 18?
Dropped passes, missed field goals, safeties, and blown calls happen fairly regularly. Losing despite a 23 point second half lead -- not so much.
That Garrett has this team controlling their own destiny overcoming a defense that has started 18 different players on the DL? All of our LBs have missed time. We have been dinged on the back end too.
The Eagles have NO PLAYERS ON IR and have only lost 30 GAMES by injured starters.
Dallas has 7 PLAYERS ON IR. And God knows how many lost games but the DL alone has surpassed the Eagles total.
With guys on D that should be at Home Depot giving up yards and points at a record pace we have somehow gotten ourselves to 5-0 in the NFC East and a win and you are in on Sunday night.
Sorry but that is not bad coaching.
I for one would love to see what this team could do with a defensive minded draft and some luck for once on the injury front. Because with even a middle of the pack defense this team would not be playing Sunday for a spot in the playoffs, they'd be playing for the #1 seed.
Garrett has this team controlling their own destiny? You have to be kidding right? There is about 2-3 games that we have lost this year all because Garrett. If we had a more experience coach we would not be in a show down with the Eagles and in fact, we would be all alone in first place in the division.
Garrett is lucky he has Romo. Otherwise he is nothing more than a below average coach, which he is.
Wrong. Green Bay scored on their first 5 drives. If Dallas didn't go on two long scoring drives, GB would've had the lead early in the 4th Q.
Jerry was halfway down to the lockerroom to fire his arse when Romo pulled off a miracle comeback.....................Jerry even said he thought the game was over and was pondering the "alternatives"..................LOL
Opie losses at home to Philly and blows a 3rd straight week 17 elimination game.......................He is done.
The mean of insanity is:
Keeping an 8-8 coach who blew the last game of each of his 3 years as coach which would have propelled this team into the playoffs. Jerry would be dumb to hire him again and expect better results.
That Garrett has this team controlling their own destiny overcoming a defense that has started 18 different players on the DL? All of our LBs have missed time. We have been dinged on the back end too.
The Eagles have NO PLAYERS ON IR and have only lost 30 GAMES by injured starters.
Dallas has 7 PLAYERS ON IR. And God knows how many lost games but the DL alone has surpassed the Eagles total.
With guys on D that should be at Home Depot giving up yards and points at a record pace we have somehow gotten ourselves to 5-0 in the NFC East and a win and you are in on Sunday night.
Sorry but that is not bad coaching.
Garrett has this team controlling their own destiny? You have to be kidding right? There is about 2-3 games that we have lost this year all because Garrett. If we had a more experience coach we would not be in a show down with the Eagles and in fact, we would be all alone in first place in the division.
Garrett is lucky he has Romo. Otherwise he is nothing more than a below average coach, which he is.
Jerry was halfway down to the lockerroom to fire his arse when Romo pulled off a miracle comeback.....................Jerry even said he thought the game was over and was pondering the "alternatives"..................LOL
Opie losses at home to Philly and blows a 3rd straight week 17 elimination game.......................He is done.
As I've said repeatedly, injuries are not an argument to keep Jason Garrett. They may be a mitigating circumstance in the presence of a legitimate argument, but they do not, in any way, speak to his quality as a coach. Regardless of the injury situation, after three years, we should have some evidence Garrett is a good coach. We don't. Instead, we have specious game management and a series of highly improbable losses that have kept the Cowboys out of the playoffs.
What's clear as day now is that Garrett should not have been hired in the first place. This was the wrong situation for him. If the Cowboys had been a team in complete rebuilding mode without a franchise quarterback, the Garrett hire might have made sense. He could've grown with them. Unfortunately, the Cowboys weren't that team. Instead, they were a team loaded at the skill positions and fielding the most prolific passer in franchise history in the prime of his career-- a career that's been squandered waiting for Garrett to "figure it out."
That's criminal.
It can be risky firing a coach, even if the decision seems obvious. I'm afraid of firing Chan Gailey and ending up with Dave Campo.
Also, there's a lot of biased judgement in this thread. I'm no Garrett lover but it's unfair to say we won 8 games in spite of him unless you can back it up with some facts. The OP made a reasonable argument for Garrett. It is a testament to Garrettt that the team is still finding ways to win despite the injuries.
That Garrett has this team controlling their own destiny overcoming a defense that has started 18 different players on the DL? All of our LBs have missed time. We have been dinged on the back end too.
The Eagles have NO PLAYERS ON IR and have only lost 30 GAMES by injured starters.
Dallas has 7 PLAYERS ON IR. And God knows how many lost games but the DL alone has surpassed the Eagles total.
With guys on D that should be at Home Depot giving up yards and points at a record pace we have somehow gotten ourselves to 5-0 in the NFC East and a win and you are in on Sunday night.
Sorry but that is not bad coaching.
I for one would love to see what this team could do with a defensive minded draft and some luck for once on the injury front. Because with even a middle of the pack defense this team would not be playing Sunday for a spot in the playoffs, they'd be playing for the #1 seed.
It can be risky firing a coach, even if the decision seems obvious. I'm afraid of firing Chan Gailey and ending up with Dave Campo.
Also, there's a lot of biased judgement in this thread. I'm no Garrett lover but it's unfair to say we won 8 games in spite of him unless you can back it up with some facts. The OP made a reasonable argument for Garrett. It is a testament to Garrettt that the team is still finding ways to win despite the injuries.
it is becoming apparent that most of the criticism geared toward Garrett is to protect the tony romo legacy.
Romo balled yesterday, he doesnt need anybody to save jack for him...................Garrett is still just as incompetent as always, but he has a shot to save his job by beating Philly.................lose at home to Philly and Garrett is done.