pansophy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,007
- Reaction score
- 4,114
Saw over 5 years ago when he played in college? Surely even the those who dislike Dak believe he has improved since his rookie year.You do realize the things I see during the eyeball test with Dak are also things the NFL scouts saw.
Weaknesses
- Inconsistency mars almost every aspect of his game, especially mechanically
- Rocks back with a slight hitch in his delivery when putting zip on the ball
- Can wind up with longer release when going down the field
- Tendency to release the ball a tad early, resulting in a sailing or fluttering pass
- Needs to vary the pace of the ball to match the situation/route (no bullets on screens)
- Location and accuracy are generally poor, makes receivers adjust to off-target balls and minimizes yards after catch
- Makes very poor decisions at times, forces passes into coverage
- Footwork can get sloppy, will fall off his base throwing to his left, loses accuracy/velocity
- Doesn’t possess the heralded “power arm” that he was once rumored to have
- Deep ball accuracy is lacking, touch passing needs a compass
- Does not throw with anticipation, poor timing leads to late throws to all areas of the field
- Can be confused and fooled by more intricate coverage schemes (ex. Alabama’s pattern reading)
- Lacks accuracy and velocity when throwing on the move
- Not a great athlete, heavy-footed and lacking lateral quickness and explosiveness as a runner
I don’t think Dak is going anywhere either, but if the Bengals would do a sign and trade of Dak and swap #1 picks I’d definitely think about it. 5 more years of cheap QB play could do a lot for the rest of the roster. Dak is definitely good enough to win. Is he, or any QB, good enough to justify the size of the cap QBs are getting?