Miami went from 12 to 3 last year for the price of a 2nd round pick.
You guys are way too reliant on that draft chart. Common sense tells you all draft classes aren't created equal. Making that chart, which grades every pick the same every year regardless of the quality of the prospects that particular year, a complete waste of time.
In other words, those top picks hold the same value in a year where you have three legitimate franchise QBs at the top as they do in a weak year with no real blue chip prospects like 2013.
Make sense? The draft board tells you so.
I've seen a direct correlation between the draft board loyalists to the combine test geeks. A never ending mission to break down football into a numeric formula when one doesn't really exist.
I don't think we can go directly by the draft charts...they are just a rough guide at best.
I do think last year was a very weak top of draft and this year is a pretty strong one.
And i do think going from 16th to 1st or 2nd this year is not the same as going from 12th to 3rd last year.
The example of Miami needing the 12th and 42nd overall pick to move up to 3rd actually backs up what I was saying. It would most likely take all (or almost all) of our draft picks to move from #16 all the way up #1 or #2 overall.
We agree that the charts aren't in stone whatsoever.
And I'm not remotely a combine test geek. Never have been.
Maybe I should have said end thread if Clowney goes #1 or #2 overall, unless we wish to spend our whole (or almost our whole) draft.
You're welcome to disagree...that comment had nothing to do with charts being in stone. It's just what I think it would take to go from 16 to 1st or 2nd overall....all, or almost all of our draft.
jmo anyway