speedkilz88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 36,949
- Reaction score
- 23,097
If he's that bad off they should just put him down.dogberry;5098830 said:Norm would have to fly to three cities to cover the draft?
If he's that bad off they should just put him down.dogberry;5098830 said:Norm would have to fly to three cities to cover the draft?
Risen Star;5098920 said:Goodell is entering Jerry hate territory for me. He's basically taken a dump on the draft since he's been in charge.
Fixing what was never broken once again.
Risen Star;5098920 said:Goodell is entering Jerry hate territory for me. He's basically taken a dump on the draft since he's been in charge.
Fixing what was never broken once again.
AbeBeta;5098928 said:The draft was clearly broken from many perspectives. As it was, you had to be a hardcore fan to watch it. What sort of major event starts at 9 am on the West Coast on a Saturday morning? Very little TV revenue there. If you aren't making money off something that can make money, it is broke.
WoodysGirl;5098730 said:For anyone who has attended the draft in New York City, it’s clear that the second evening and the third day lack the sizzle of the first night of the event.
The NFL knows it, too. Which could result in a dramatic change for the event.
The draft could be moving. To three cities in three days.
According to Don Banks of SI.com, the league is considering uprooting the draft from New York City and splitting the event over three cities per year, possibly with some geographic connection among the locations.
Read the rest: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/06/11/draft-could-become-a-multi-city-affair/
Risen Star;5098920 said:Goodell is entering Jerry hate territory for me. He's basically taken a dump on the draft since he's been in charge.
Fixing what was never broken once again.
I believe they'll treat it like they would game coverage.Fredd;5099121 said:Creates revenue but to the average fan watching on TV, it won't matter...I would think that it will suck for the guys that have to announce things live at ESPN and NFLN...will they just do everything from their home studios or have to fly to the different venues to be in the 3 cities live?
You're probably right. But, I'd be hard pressed to go to the draft for rounds 5,6, and 7 or whatever even if it was right in my back yard.Picksix;5098811 said:I don't think it has much to do with viewership, but moreso live audience and atmosphere. They're thinking is that, by day 2 and 3, the NY crowd dies down, and along with it, the "energy in the room". So they move it to a different city, with a different audience, who is just as jazzed about being at the draft as those who go to Radio City that Thursday night. As for people like you and me, who primarily just watch it on TV, probably not much change.
TheCount;5098976 said:You're right, they should put sponsor logos on game jerseys, switch the star out for the KFC logo, force every owner to maintain two teams so that when one team is in the offseason the second team is playing.
So much untapped revenue.
As for the draft, I don't give a damn where it is as long as they don't make it any longer.
big dog cowboy;5099170 said:I've always thought the draft should be at Cowboys Stadium.
Flinger;5099297 said:Let me guess - NYC, Boston and Washington right?
But, no NE bias...
AbeBeta;5099269 said:I would bet that the league has explored that option and it likely didn't test well. If you think for a second the NFL jumps into these decisions without extensive market research, you are a fool. This isn't just Goodell saying "I want to try this!"
You don't tap things that will upset the majority of fans. The only people who are "upset" about this are the people who just react negatively to anything associated with Goodell.
AbeBeta;5099269 said:If you don't like how long the draft is then you really should commend Goodell who has worked to speed up the process. It wasn't too long ago that you'd have 20 minutes between picks in the first round