True. That's a discussion for another conversation.Fair point. But he had plenty of other chances to win that game after the drop.
Or he simply doesn't have "it" when the game is on the line. More often then not he falters, whereas Dak has it and is much more confident at the end of gamesWentz's biggest problem is that he cannot stay healthy. Lack of that means rehab time and long periods of not being able to practice regularly or throw regularly.
He's always hurt.
4-15 with the game on the line....Wentz isnt what people try to tell you he is!
He’ll enjoy his Super Bowl MVP trophy too, the one Wentz will never touch in a million years.Well he can enjoy that moral victory from his hospital bed
Yeah, you are certainly drunk. Sober up and maybe what I'm saying will make sense.Am i drunk or is the autistic guy playing his own game, with his own made up rules, against people that dont even know a game is being played, or even want to play it?
PS im a little drunk
Yeah, you are certainly drunk. Sober up and maybe what I'm saying will make sense.
Hiccup!
Nah i think there needs to be a special needs tag attached to your name. @Idgit make this happenYeah, you are certainly drunk. Sober up and maybe what I'm saying will make sense.
Hiccup!
Don't like defending Wentz, but this is the same kind of ignorance we display toward our own QBs, so I'm going to point out the fact that Agholar dropped a perfectly thrown pass that would have gone for a TD. I'm glad he did and I want Wentz to suck as a QB, but what he was on that play was a QB who should have won the game but didn't because of his receiver.
Now, he threw plenty of bad passes that he can be called out on, but loss No. 15 with the game on his line was far from his fault.
Perhaps,as I'll not beg to differ nor dither upon that non-existent debatable venue,my goodly fellow, yet,the fecals held that luxury of over a minute remaining on the clock, regardless ,my FriendIt would have been a nice gain but i dont think a td. Safety had an angle
Or he simply doesn't have "it" when the game is on the line. More often then not he falters, whereas Dak has it and is much more confident at the end of games
It's kind of sad really. Probably hear the same thing tomorrow from the talking heads on TV.I do not understand why these fans who are negative about Dak do not pick a better rival Qb to champion than Wentz ........ Pick Rogers or Brady or Mahomes.
Don't like defending Wentz, but this is the same kind of ignorance we display toward our own QBs, so I'm going to point out the fact that Agholar dropped a perfectly thrown pass that would have gone for a TD. I'm glad he did and I want Wentz to suck as a QB, but what he was on that play was a QB who should have won the game but didn't because of his receiver.
Now, he threw plenty of bad passes that he can be called out on, but loss No. 15 with the game on his line was far from his fault.
Uh, because some of us don't drink. Funny, I know.Why is anyone sober right now? I don't get ya'll.....
Uh, because some of us don't drink. Funny, I know.
Well, I do have an autistic son. But I don't think that's a laugh matter. It says something about your mentality if you think special needs designations are matters of comedy and laughter. But you did say you were drunk … a little.Nah i think there needs to be a special needs tag attached to your name. @Idgit make this happen
Yes, I do.Well some of us don't don't drink so we are in the ballbark of understanding I suppose..? You like that laughing star thingy....
And if Wentz had played well throughout the game the Eagles wouldn't have needed a game winning touchdown drive. The people who try and defend Wentz because of a single pass he threw have no concept of football
Apparently, it is difficult for you to match wits with me. I don't act as if it was one play. I know what happened in the game.
But CONTEXT supports my "wit" because I authored the question bound by a particular contextual inquiry.
YOU wanted to pontificate beyond what I asked. In court, the state prosecutor would appeal to the judge for you to just "answer the question" and not offer side commentary.