As soon as he realized he had to throw the ball farther than 10 yards on occasion, he fell apart very quickly.
He was not a reach in that draft class at all.
Look where QB's usually go.
He is a super talented player and he did not embarrass himself at all as a rookie. That offense lacks talent and he played pretty good for a rookie QB.
He was not a reach in that draft class at all.
Look where QB's usually go.
He is a super talented player and he did not embarrass himself at all as a rookie. That offense lacks talent and he played pretty good for a rookie QB.
Of COURSE he was a reach. From a small school that had much more talent then most they played. Limited starting experience. Noted problems with accuracy and footwork and reading defenses.
Potential yes. BUT what he had SHOWN in college did not deserve a first rd rating. LET ALONE the #2 pick. Now of course that is not rare- Jamarcus Russell probably will all time hold the title of being the most over rated- but that does not excuse the extreme REACH for Wentz. Or Goff for that matter.
QB's are always overvalued, I agree, and it makes most teams pay. He's talented, I wouldn't say 'super talented'. I'd keep that word for the Peyton Mannings and Drew Brees's of the world, but had he been drafted late in the first or early 2nd, his progress as a rookie would have been about right. Upside with things to work on.
But the fact that he artificially (in my opinion, he didn't play into his draft spot, hype drove him up) worked his way up to 2nd overall pick means he should be more of a finished product, which in my opinion he isn't.
Just makes me glad we got our guy in pretty much the 5th round!
As soon as he realized he had to throw the ball farther than 10 yards on occasion, he fell apart very quickly.
79.3 rating. Right in between Blake Bortles and Trevor Siemian.
He was not a reach in that draft class at all.
Look where QB's usually go.
He is a super talented player and he did not embarrass himself at all as a rookie. That offense lacks talent and he played pretty good for a rookie QB.
He stunk last year. He got by in the first 3 games because Pederson's play calling was so wacky that nobody could have prepared for it. 79.3 QB rating with 16 TD's to 14 INT's in that system is pretty poor. His QB rating on passes over 15 yards in the air was abysmal. And if you watch All-22 he had a lot of receivers open (because the offense is designed to get players open) that he just never saw because he lacks the anticipation.
As I said when the season started last year, it was a stupid move by the Eagles to start him right away. They fell in love with the fact that he knew the playbook and his athleticism and arm strength, but neglected the fact that he has serious throwing mechanic issues and would likely struggle with anticipation given NFL defenses are light years faster than the defenses he faced at North Dakota State.
You have to sit those type of QB's down, let them iron out the throwing mechanics (Wentz has a terrible delivery which is harder to correct than poor footwork) and let them understand all of the little behind the scenes parts of being a NFL QB along with slowly integrating the change in the speed of the game for him.
Cody Kessler was better than Wentz was last year.
YR
He far from stunk. He played like a young promising rookie.
When you consider the competition jump and also factor in the amount of time he missed his senior year he played very well as a rookie and he's only going to get better.
He's the full package and if Pederson doesn't screw it up and they get some WR's that can catch then he's going to be good.
your stance on Wentz is like Risen's on Dak. Completely without visible support- a ghost evaluation.
He far from stunk. He played like a young promising rookie.
When you consider the competition jump and also factor in the amount of time he missed his senior year he played very well as a rookie and he's only going to get better.
He's the full package and if Pederson doesn't screw it up and they get some WR's that can catch then he's going to be good.
He stunk. He didn't play like a young, promising rookie. His best play came in those first 3 games when he was throwing nothing but extremely short routes with a lot of misdirection that doesn't require any anticipation and leaves receivers wide open. Then the brazen and often wacky play calling by Pederson which included things like throwing quick screens to a TE on the 5-yard line that no team was prepared for made things very easy for Wentz in those games.
His accuracy was horrendous and he couldn't throw anything accurately from past 15 yards and was more or less a 1-read QB that struggled to use the checkdown effectively. .
The only promising part to his game was his pure arm strength, size and mobility. But his throwing motion is so elongated that it negates his pure arm strength and makes it even more difficult to anticipate throws.
The only reason why I wasn't dead set against him being drafted by the Cowboys is that I thought with his ability to understand offenses, his athleticism, size and arm strength that if he took at least 1 year on the bench (if not two years), those attributes along with a total re-tooling of his throwing mechanics and slowly integrating him into the speed of the game could make for a franchise QB. And at that time I thought Romo might last for another year or two.
However, I also thought the same with Paxton Lynch who was bigger with a better arm and played against tougher competition with inferior teammates. If Wentz is a promising young QB, then Lynch and Cody Kessler must be future HoF'ers.
YR
Oh brother. Always something with that guy. He needs to retire or find an island to smoke pot all day like that other player who "needed to find himself".He is in Canada, but is not quite playing.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/v...k-in-canada-has-already-hit-a-major-obstacle/
Ok well we will see.
He's going to be a really good NFL QB IMO and what do you have him as?
For sure a future Pro Bowler if that still means anything to anyone.
QB's are always overvalued, I agree, and it makes most teams pay. He's talented, I wouldn't say 'super talented'. I'd keep that word for the Peyton Mannings and Drew Brees's of the world, but had he been drafted late in the first or early 2nd, his progress as a rookie would have been about right. Upside with things to work on.
But the fact that he artificially (in my opinion, he didn't play into his draft spot, hype drove him up) worked his way up to 2nd overall pick means he should be more of a finished product, which in my opinion he isn't.
Just makes me glad we got our guy in pretty much the 5th round!
I see him right now as a Tim Couch, Kyle Boller, Blake Bortles, David Klingler or a David Carr.
Not really horrendous, but not very good. Excellent athletes and most with big arms (except for Bortles) who started right away when they weren't ready and they played either against weaker competition or in a gimmicky offense (Couch and Klingler).
Maybe things turn around for him, but since they insist on continuing to start him the odds are against him.
YR
That's exactly right.
The hype after the Senior bowl lifted him a full round.