ESPN: Clayton: Top five Super Bowl XLIII contenders

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
Giants in the mix, but five others might be stronger

By John Clayton
ESPN.com




Updated: February 5, 2008 The New York Giants have the makings to be a top Super Bowl XLIII contender, but it's hard for a team to repeat as champion.
Eli Manning has become an elite quarterback with four playoff wins, including Super Bowl XLII on Sunday. And as long as the Giants don't lose Steve Spagnuolo as defensive coordinator, their defense should improve. In addition, the offense has a great running attack that complements Manning's passing. But bad things happen to Super Bowl champions. The Indianapolis Colts lost left tackle Tarik Glenn to retirement after Super Bowl XLI. And injuries tend to increase after a Super Bowl season. So who are the top five contenders to earn a trip to Tampa, Fla. for a Super Bowl XLIII berth?

1. New England Patriots:
The Patriots should be no worse than 14-2. Why? They have the easiest schedule in football. In fact, their .387 opponents' winning percentage for the 2008 schedule is one of the easiest slates in the modern era. Their division is easy, and they play the AFC West and NFC West.
Coach Bill Belichick has to keep the receiving corps together, and that starts with re-signing Randy Moss. The team also has to decide if it wants to keep Donte' Stallworth. Tom Brady wants Moss, so you figure he will be back.
On the downside, five trips to the West Coast could wear down the team. Another concern could be "Spygate." If former team employee Matt Walsh has proof of video spying during past Super Bowls, Belichick could be in trouble.

AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi
Antonio Gates, left, hopes to help the Chargers run away from the pack to a Super Bowl berth next season.


2. San Diego Chargers: This could be their year. They have the best collection of talent in football. Philip Rivers is coming off ACL surgery, but he should be ready for the season. And general manager A.J. Smith has all the top players signed. To make matters better, the Chargers have an easy schedule. At .422, it should allow them to be a 13- or 14-win team. The AFC is pretty easy to figure out. The Patriots and Chargers should have the top two seeds and get the bye weeks. Both teams have the talent. Both teams have the schedules. The Chargers showed they can respond to coach Norv Turner. Now that they have won playoff games, they will be dangerous for 2008 and years after.

3. Indianapolis Colts: As long as Peyton Manning is around, the Colts are a Super Bowl contender. This will be the team's best offseason in recent history in the sense that it won't lose key defensive free agents. The Colts do have to solidify a few things on the offensive line, but it is pretty well set as long as they re-sign either Jake Scott or Ryan Lilja.
Tony Dungy's agreement to return for another year is a big boost to the team's morale. But despite that positive development, it will hard for the Colts to be a top-two seed. They play in the toughest division in football, the AFC South. Their schedule includes a dozen teams with .500 records or better; at.584, it is one of the toughest in the league. Still, as the Giants proved, you don't have to be a top seed to go to the Super Bowl. Heck, the Colts did it as a third seed in Super Bowl XLI and came away with a ring. Don't write off the Colts if they finish 11-5 or 10-6.

4. Dallas Cowboys: The Cowboys are loaded. They have 13 Pro Bowlers, and Tony Romo has established himself as an elite quarterback. However, he needs to grow up a little. His vacation with Jessica Simpson turned into a disaster. He is entitled to his personal life, but he needs to more responsible as a leader on a team.

Wade Phillips should only make the defense better in his second year as head coach. Although the Cowboys' 3-4 is talented, it didn't maximize its potential. The Cowboys need to get better against the run and not bite on as many play-action fakes. Still, they are the most talented team in a very tough NFC East race.

5. Green Bay Packers: Obviously, this is contingent on Brett Favre coming back. He had too much fun in 2007-08 to retire. The Packers are one of the youngest teams in football, and the receiving corps is extremely talented. Running back Ryan Grant gives Favre the ability to use play-action passes, and general manager Ted Thompson should be able to find another young back to pair with Grant. Also, the defense is aggressive and talented.
Where the Packers have an edge over the Giants, who probably are the sixth-best Super Bowl contender, is that they don't have to play in an impossible division. The Packers were the only team in the NFC North to have a winning record.

John Clayton, a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame writers' wing, is a senior writer for ESPN.com.
 

HardHittingRoy31

New Member
Messages
463
Reaction score
0
Cbz40;1944879 said:
Giants in the mix, but five others might be stronger

By John Clayton
ESPN.com




Updated: February 5, 2008 The New York Giants have the makings to be a top Super Bowl XLIII contender, but it's hard for a team to repeat as champion.
Eli Manning has become an elite quarterback with four playoff wins, including Super Bowl XLII on Sunday. And as long as the Giants don't lose Steve Spagnuolo as defensive coordinator, their defense should improve. In addition, the offense has a great running attack that complements Manning's passing. But bad things happen to Super Bowl champions. The Indianapolis Colts lost left tackle Tarik Glenn to retirement after Super Bowl XLI. And injuries tend to increase after a Super Bowl season. So who are the top five contenders to earn a trip to Tampa, Fla. for a Super Bowl XLIII berth?

1. New England Patriots: The Patriots should be no worse than 14-2. Why? They have the easiest schedule in football. In fact, their .387 opponents' winning percentage for the 2008 schedule is one of the easiest slates in the modern era. Their division is easy, and they play the AFC West and NFC West.
Coach Bill Belichick has to keep the receiving corps together, and that starts with re-signing Randy Moss. The team also has to decide if it wants to keep Donte' Stallworth. Tom Brady wants Moss, so you figure he will be back.
On the downside, five trips to the West Coast could wear down the team. Another concern could be "Spygate." If former team employee Matt Walsh has proof of video spying during past Super Bowls, Belichick could be in trouble.

AP Photo/Lenny Ignelzi
Antonio Gates, left, hopes to help the Chargers run away from the pack to a Super Bowl berth next season.


2. San Diego Chargers: This could be their year. They have the best collection of talent in football. Philip Rivers is coming off ACL surgery, but he should be ready for the season. And general manager A.J. Smith has all the top players signed. To make matters better, the Chargers have an easy schedule. At .422, it should allow them to be a 13- or 14-win team. The AFC is pretty easy to figure out. The Patriots and Chargers should have the top two seeds and get the bye weeks. Both teams have the talent. Both teams have the schedules. The Chargers showed they can respond to coach Norv Turner. Now that they have won playoff games, they will be dangerous for 2008 and years after.

3. Indianapolis Colts: As long as Peyton Manning is around, the Colts are a Super Bowl contender. This will be the team's best offseason in recent history in the sense that it won't lose key defensive free agents. The Colts do have to solidify a few things on the offensive line, but it is pretty well set as long as they re-sign either Jake Scott or Ryan Lilja.
Tony Dungy's agreement to return for another year is a big boost to the team's morale. But despite that positive development, it will hard for the Colts to be a top-two seed. They play in the toughest division in football, the AFC South. Their schedule includes a dozen teams with .500 records or better; at.584, it is one of the toughest in the league. Still, as the Giants proved, you don't have to be a top seed to go to the Super Bowl. Heck, the Colts did it as a third seed in Super Bowl XLI and came away with a ring. Don't write off the Colts if they finish 11-5 or 10-6.

4. Dallas Cowboys: The Cowboys are loaded. They have 13 Pro Bowlers, and Tony Romo has established himself as an elite quarterback. However, he needs to grow up a little. His vacation with Jessica Simpson turned into a disaster. He is entitled to his personal life, but he needs to more responsible as a leader on a team.

Wade Phillips should only make the defense better in his second year as head coach. Although the Cowboys' 3-4 is talented, it didn't maximize its potential. The Cowboys need to get better against the run and not bite on as many play-action fakes. Still, they are the most talented team in a very tough NFC East race.

5. Green Bay Packers: Obviously, this is contingent on Brett Favre coming back. He had too much fun in 2007-08 to retire. The Packers are one of the youngest teams in football, and the receiving corps is extremely talented. Running back Ryan Grant gives Favre the ability to use play-action passes, and general manager Ted Thompson should be able to find another young back to pair with Grant. Also, the defense is aggressive and talented.
Where the Packers have an edge over the Giants, who probably are the sixth-best Super Bowl contender, is that they don't have to play in an impossible division. The Packers were the only team in the NFC North to have a winning record.

John Clayton, a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame writers' wing, is a senior writer for ESPN.com.


Pro Hall Of Shame, John Clayton! The Cowboys were good against the run, what the hell is he talking, in case, spitting about. John Clayton is a Tool and doesn't know Jack about the Cowboys. :lmao2:
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Did we get burned by biting on a single play-action fake all season?
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
theogt;1944897 said:
Did we get burned by biting on a single play-action fake all season?

i think he was taking our LBers in ability to get deep into their zones on that when in fact they just couldnt do it.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,011
Reaction score
37,153
theogt;1944897 said:
Did we get burned by biting on a single play-action fake all season?

Sadly, no. We got burned because we had Jacques Reeves in the secondary.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
FuzzyLumpkins;1944907 said:
i think he was taking our LBers in ability to get deep into their zones on that when in fact they just couldnt do it.

then he would have said the LBs if he was talking about them, he just said they, as in the defense
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
gimmesix;1944910 said:
Sadly, no. We got burned because we had Jacques Reeves in the secondary.

it was more than just Jacque Reeves, we did a horrible job overall at diagnosing plays in the secondary, esp. late
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
Bob Sacamano;1944914 said:
then he would have said the LBs if he was talking about them, he just said they, as in the defense

how would you know? oh yeah you dont.

our LBers had issues getting into their zones. thats what PA fakes are supposed to do. I put the two together and draw a hypothesis. youre purporting to read his mind. are you going to follow me around all night and try to bait me?

do i need to ressurect the fan club?
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
FuzzyLumpkins;1944924 said:
how would you know? oh yeah you dont
our LBers had issues getting into their zones. thats what PA fakes are supposed to do. I put the two together and draw a hypothesis. youre purporting to read his mind. are you going to follow me around all night and try to bait me?

he didn't say anything about LBs, I'm reporting what he actually wrote, he talks about the defense, and says that they need to stop biting on play-actions, if he meant the LBs, he should have said them

and PA fakes don't just try to lure the LBs in, they try to get the whole defense to committ to the run, while they go deep to the WRs over the top

FuzzyLumpkins said:
do i need to ressurect the fan club?

how am I baiting you? I was joining WITH you, in making fun of Bach, in that other thread, and now I'm replying to you, just like I've replied to numerous other people today
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,011
Reaction score
37,153
Bob Sacamano;1944915 said:
it was more than just Jacque Reeves, we did a horrible job overall at diagnosing plays in the secondary, esp. late

The funny thing is that we didn't really allow a whole lot of deep passes that come from "biting on play-action." We continually gave too much cushion and allowed teams to complete quick passes that somewhat negated our pass rush. (I do believe the injuries to Newman and Henry affected the way they played at times.)

Reeves was one of those who gave up a lot of room in front of him, but then when he tried not to, he bit on the short fake and let receivers get behind him.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
gimmesix;1944945 said:
The funny thing is that we didn't really allow a whole lot of deep passes that come from "biting on play-action." We continually gave too much cushion and allowed teams to complete quick passes that somewhat negated our pass rush. (I do believe the injuries to Newman and Henry affected the way they played at times.)

Reeves was one of those who gave up a lot of room in front of him, but then when he tried not to, he bit on the short fake and let receivers get behind him.

John Clayton is an idiot, we can forget about that biting on the play-action comment

w/ saying that, yes, we weren't beat deep much at all because we were protecting against the deep pass, and gave the QB everything short, in hopes that they would throw into coverage, but alot of times later during the season, our coverage wasn't doing it

Reeves was the biggest culprit, but he wasn't the only one, I remember Wade complaining many of times that they had the correct coverages called, just the players weren't executing them
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
theogt;1944897 said:
Did we get burned by biting on a single play-action fake all season?

Hamlin bit on a run fake on Stallworth's long TD catch in the New England game.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
AdamJT13;1944956 said:
Hamlin bit on a run fake on Stallworth's long TD catch in the New England game.
I was being facetious. Obviously it happened at least once. But seriously I doubt it was more than a handful of times.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
theogt;1944973 said:
That wasn't a bite on a play-action.

how do you know? you didn't even know that Hamlin got beat on a run-fake against New England

lalalalalalalala
 
Top