ESPN: Five Moves Cowboys Should Make

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
Yeah, but it hasn't just been "last year". His production has steadily fallen off a cliff over the past 4 years, in every rushing category. I don't see why anyone would want to waste a dime for that.




So then I have to ask, why bring him in at all?

Because McFadden is still under contract so my guess is they stick with RBBC. I doubt McFadden makes it through another season unscathed and you never know what you're getting with a rookie. Cheap insurance.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,557
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Because McFadden is still under contract so my guess is they stick with RBBC. I doubt McFadden makes it through another season unscathed and you never know what you're getting with a rookie. Cheap insurance.

Even for veteran minimum, you're overpaying for Morris and that awful production.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,872
Reaction score
15,969
Morris is a decent option at the right price and if other plans fall through.

It would be an upgrade over Turbin at least short-term.

You'd still want to re-sign Dunbar for that speed back/slot element
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,872
Reaction score
15,969
Aldon smith makes zero sense. Guy has more issues and less prodcuction than Greg Hardy.

Rest of article pretty well done IMHO.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
Even for veteran minimum, you're overpaying for Morris and that awful production.

3/4 seasons of over 4 ypc. You're right, that's awful.

He'll go somewhere and be a good contributor next season. He's got plenty of run left in his legs.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,557
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
3/4 seasons of over 4 ypc. You're right, that's awful.

You know what it is? It's a clear and steady decline in productivity. Somebody getting worse, not better.

He'll go somewhere and be a good contributor next season. He's got plenty of run left in his legs.

As long as it's "somewhere" else.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
A sentence I never thought I'd read - A deal for somebody like Tarvaris Jackson would be wise.

You get out and you never come back.I have been adamantly against RGIII, but I would take him before Tavaris "Quincy" Jackson.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
Follow those five steps and you guarantee the Cowboys take Ramsey (if available) at #4 or they trade down and take another DB.

One of the reasons I think Ramsey is a given. Makes sense, at least business wise
 

DeaconMoss

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,392
Reaction score
7,302
No to Murray and Morris. Draft a RB. Turbin, DMC are fine, need a rook to go with the pair.

SMH on Jackson and Stanton.:thumbdown:
 

Oh_Canada

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
4,222
I agree with most of this, but a major problem for this team is push up the middle and specifically from the one-tech. Love Maranelli, but at some point someone has to get it through his skull more and more teams are getting the ball out in the two second range rendering the outside rush almost useless. Wasting a starting spot on a guy who has two career sacks in five years is plain ridiculous.
 

aikemirv

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,405
Reaction score
9,999
No to Alfred Morris.

He's a product to Shannahans scheme and offers nothing in the pass game at all.


Draft a RB.

I think Alfred Morris was a product of RGIII rushing attack at the time. He was only good when teams had to focus on the read option by RGIII
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,557
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I think Alfred Morris was a product of RGIII rushing attack at the time. He was only good when teams had to focus on the read option by RGIII

And his stats would support your case.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
I agree with most of this, but a major problem for this team is push up the middle and specifically from the one-tech. Love Maranelli, but at some point someone has to get it through his skull more and more teams are getting the ball out in the two second range rendering the outside rush almost useless. Wasting a starting spot on a guy who has two career sacks in five years is plain ridiculous.

That won't happen.

He is married to the things he does. He is not at the age where he is just suddenly going to go against beliefs he thinks have made him successful.

The only way it gets through his skull is with a pink slip.
 

foofighters

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,453
Reaction score
7,148
The only 5 moves they need to execute in order to win are: Dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
The concepts are good but not the players. Add a vet RB could be a good idea, drafting a young RB would be Better option
Signing an edge rusher is a good idea, smith is not
Passing on a trade for Murray is smart, looking at him if he is cut is a whole different thing
I would like to add a vet CB myself so we can then draft a QB at 4 and a stud DT at 34
We need depth at de but we need a real penetrating picket pusher next to Crawford inside to make our edge rushers more effective. A QB can step up into the pocket to avoid a edge rusher, take that option away and you get an effective pass rush
 

Pabst

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,440
Reaction score
1,060
I'd rather Dallas pool money towards paying for Frederick, Martin and Collins. Maybe sign Jason Jones if you can get him at a sweetheart 2 year deal. Bring in Stanton or Matt Moore to back up Romo.
 
Top