ESPN Mosley: Beast presents five major training camp issues

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,633
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Beast presents five major training camp issues

July 10, 2009 2:30 PM



Getty Images
Cowboys wide receiver Roy Williams, Eagles cornerback Asante Samuel and Commanders quarterback Jason Campbell are just some of the players in the NFC East with questions surrounding them this offseason.

Posted by ESPN.com's Matt Mosley

In case you haven't checked the calendar lately, we're a little more than two weeks away from the start of training camp. The dog days of the offseason are almost over, and we begin obsessing about important world issues, such as who will be the starting right tackle for the Commanders. In this week's column, let's take a look at five major issues that will be addressed in NFC East training camps. Then I'm taking more vacation -- if you can believe it.

How will Commanders quarterback Jason Campbell respond to an offseason of unrest?

In one of the more interesting offseason strategies in recent memory, the Washington Commanders basically played mind games with their starting quarterback for a couple of months. First, they fell in love with the disgruntled, but prolific, Jay Cutler. Then it was USC's Mark Sanchez who caught Dan Snyder's eye.

Meanwhile, head coach Jim Zorn was left behind to tend to what was left of Campbell's dignity. Campbell continued to show up for voluntary workouts even while his team tried desperately to replace him. And unlike Cutler, he handled the Commanders' awkward pursuit of a trophy QB with grace and humility. And you wonder why I defend Campbell at every turn?

Now, Campbell has to put all the offseason drama aside and try to take the next step as a quarterback, which is leading his team to the playoffs. If he played in the AFC West, that might be a snap. But Campbell plays in the rugged Beast, a place where playoff dreams can be crushed in a hurry. Just ask the Commanders, who were the darlings of the first eight games last season. They won road games in Dallas and Philly, and seemed destined for the playoffs. But it all came crumbling down in the second half, thanks in part to injuries, coaching and overall poor play.

This season, Campbell should feel more confident in Zorn's offense. If the offensive line can hold up and Clinton Portis can remain healthy, Campbell could have a strong season. He also needs second-year players such as Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly to grow up and become contributors. I think Campbell's about to surprise a lot of people with an excellent season, but then, I always think that about him.

What will the Giants' offense look like without Plaxico Burress?




Burress
This seems to be a popular theme in the Beast. How will the Cowboys and Giants perform without their top receivers from the past few years? I honestly think the Giants will be better equipped to handle the loss of Burress than the Cowboys will be without T.O. First off, this is truly Eli Manning's team now. General manager Jerry Reese pretty much said that in the offseason, and I think that's a good thing. You saw what happened in '07 when Manning didn't have Tiki Barber and Jeremy Shockey snipping at him down the stretch. He became much more confident during the Super Bowl run.

I could tell during training camp last season that Manning was annoyed with Burress missing all those practices because of injury -- and it's something we wrote about. Now he's had almost a whole offseason of knowing that Burress won't be around. I think the Giants have moved forward and realized they'll simply have to compensate for the loss of Burress in other areas, such as one of the league's best running games. But it's Manning who will be called upon to win games. In training camp, you'll see a guy excited about working with rookies Hakeem Nicks and Ramses Barden. Manning also believes in "veterans" Steve Smith and Domenik Hixon. The Eagles and Giants are really close heading into training camp, but because of Manning's presence, the G-Men have the edge -- at least in my mind.

What will the Cowboys' offense look like without -- wait for it -- Terrell Owens?




Owens
Like it or not -- and many of you guys hate it -- T.O.'s shadow will continue to hang over this offense during training camp. As the owner's son recently said, T.O.'s gone because his presence made it virtually impossible for Tony Romo to take charge of the locker room. Now we'll see if not having the most polarizing player in the league will help the Cowboys feature a more balanced approach. In a futile effort to keep T.O. happy, offensive coordinator Jason Garrett too often tailored the offense around him.

With three quality running backs and perhaps one of the top tight end tandems in the league, the Cowboys can and should do it a different way this season. There also will be a lot of pressure on Roy Williams to become the No. 1 guy that he's regarded to be. Last season, he looked completely lost at times. But with a lot of work in the weight room and bonding time with Romo (please!), he may be poised to put up solid numbers (1,100 yards, 8 TDs). I also think Miles Austin is sort of the X-factor in all this. If he can become a consistent downfield threat to complement Williams, the Cowboys' offense may not take a major step back. But go ahead and prepare yourself for the deluge of T.O. stories coming out of San Antonio. Not me, though! Promise.

Should we be worried about the fact that defensive coordinator Jim Johnson and Brian Dawkins won't be in Eagles camp?




Dawkins
It's a sobering thought to Eagles fans, but it's about to become a reality. I think the Eagles will miss Dawkins' passion and penchant for the big play. His leadership skills were unmatched, but I think they'll be able to replace his production on the field. Quintin Mikell has quietly (because of Dawkins) become a really solid player. He's an instinctive player who's capable of having a breakout season in terms of takeaways. Quintin Demps will be an adequate replacement as a starting safety, and players such as Trent Cole and cornerback Asante Samuel will take on larger leadership roles on defense.

Samuel's sort of mercurial guy, but he's loud on the practice field and makes plays when it counts. What he did last season in the playoffs helps give him even more credibility in the locker room. The Eagles need their young linebackers to continue to improve. That's where Jim Johnson's absence scares me a little bit because I think he's an unbelievable resource for the young guys. Fortunately for the Eagles, Sean McDermott has been a highly regarded understudy and I don't think the interim job will be too much for him. The Eagles also brought in an NFC East expert in former Cowboys defensive coordinator Brian Stewart. Andy Reid has immense respect for Stewart, so that should be a good fit. Plus, Stewart has extra incentive to prepare for the Cowboys since his good friend and mentor Wade Phillips fired him after the '08 season.

How would you rank these teams heading into training camp?

I knew you guys would love one last Beast power ranking before training camp. And of course, this is subject to change once I start watching practices -- since I have such a keen eye for that sort of thing. As I referenced earlier, the Giants have too many intangibles for me to ignore. They brought in all the reinforcements on defense, although linebacker Michael Boley's off to a slow start. Still, their pass rush has a chance to be the best in football. It's a deep rotation, and I know Justin Tuck is thrilled that he won't see so many double teams.

This team has the whole "we've been there" thing going for it and Manning's poised to have an MVP-caliber season. I mean that. For some reason, people still love to question the man's credentials. I don't get that at all -- and he's about to silence even more critics. So I have the Giants winning the division at 12-4 and the Eagles will be right behind them at 11-5. I'm anxious to see how LeSean McCoy fits in early in the season. If he's ready for prime time, that could be a lethal offense.

The Cowboys aren't buying into their own hype as much right now -- and that's a good thing. With their schedule, you can easily see them getting to 10-6 and grabbing the division's third playoff spot. Wait, am I being biased toward my division? We can't have that!

The Commanders would be challenging for the top spot in divisions such as the AFC West, NFC South and NFC West. But alas, they're stuck in the Beast. This team could be much improved -- and still go 8-8. It pains me to say it, but that's where I think they'll end up.

Thanks for your time. Enjoy my vacation.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,291
Reaction score
63,974
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
WoodysGirl;2838472 said:
In a futile effort to keep T.O. happy, offensive coordinator Jason Garrett too often tailored the offense around him.

http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/khiladifif.jpg
 

Big D

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,202
Reaction score
3,860
I honestly think the Giants will be better equipped to handle the loss of Burress than the Cowboys will be without T.O.

Wrong! If he thinks that Hixon, Smith or Nicks will be a better #1 wr than RW he's trippin.
 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
Big D;2839019 said:
Wrong! If he thinks that Hixon, Smith or Nicks will be a better #1 wr than RW he's trippin.

He's just being Mosley, RW could have a 1500 yard 15 TD season and he'd still find something to fault the guy for
 

TheHustler

Active Member
Messages
5,392
Reaction score
1
Big D;2839019 said:
Wrong! If he thinks that Hixon, Smith or Nicks will be a better #1 wr than RW he's trippin.

That's not what he said. He said the Giants will be better equipped to handle the loss of Burress.
 

Big D

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,202
Reaction score
3,860
TheHustler;2839035 said:
That's not what he said. He said the Giants will be better equipped to handle the loss of Burress.

Ok. If he thinks the addition of Nicks and Ellis will equip Manning more than a healthy Jones , RW and getting rid of T.O. helps Romo, he's trippin.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
so TO's ghost will hover around the Cowboys, sniping away at their chances, while Plax's ghost will be a benign, friendly one?

ok
 

TheHustler

Active Member
Messages
5,392
Reaction score
1
Big D;2839051 said:
Ok. If he thinks the addition of Nicks and Ellis will equip Manning more than a healthy Jones , RW and getting rid of T.O. helps Romo, he's trippin.

Still, not what he's saying. He's saying the Giants as are better equipped to handle the loss of Burress than we are to handle the loss of TO.

It encompasses more than just the players brought in (or brought back to health) to replace the player lost.

It has to do with coaching, strategy, and the ability to properly use players.

The Giants lose a talented player, and it hurts, but they win by coaching strategy and their ability to use players.

We lose a talented player, and it hurts more, because we win (or don't win) by talent.

Are we more talented? Sure. Has it translated to a better performance on the field? No.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,816
Reaction score
112,659
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Bob Sacamano;2839064 said:
so TO's ghost will hover around the Cowboys, sniping away at their chances, while Plax's ghost will be a benign, friendly one?

ok
Consider the source.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
With three quality running backs and perhaps one of the top tight end tandems in the league,
Other than the fact that Mosely is normally an idiot...why not just say that it IS one of the top tandems in the league.

A) it is the best
B) saying "perhaps one of" is no different than saying above average. god this drives me nuts.
 

Dawgs0916

Will the Thrill
Messages
2,195
Reaction score
4
WoodysGirl;2838472 said:
Cowboys defensive coordinator Brian Stewart. Andy Reid has immense respect for Stewart, so that should be a good fit. Plus, Stewart has extra incentive to prepare for the Cowboys since his good friend and mentor Wade Phillips fired him after the '08 season.

I guess Jerry Jones forcing Phillip's hand, means Phillips fired him....since Phillips is the boss of this team right?

I'm sure the grudge Stewart may hold, isn't aimed in Wade's direction.
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,675
Reaction score
18,031
I have never been a fan of Jason Campbell, but I feel for the guy, having to put up with all that disrespect from little fealla danny snyder and Zorn . . . .

You are better than that, Jason. Hang in there, except when you play the Cowboys.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,947
Reaction score
23,096
TheHustler;2839175 said:
Still, not what he's saying. He's saying the Giants as are better equipped to handle the loss of Burress than we are to handle the loss of TO.

It encompasses more than just the players brought in (or brought back to health) to replace the player lost.

It has to do with coaching, strategy, and the ability to properly use players.

The Giants lose a talented player, and it hurts, but they win by coaching strategy and their ability to use players.

We lose a talented player, and it hurts more, because we win (or don't win) by talent.

Are we more talented? Sure. Has it translated to a better performance on the field? No.
The Giants coaches had such a great strategy last year when they went in the tank.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,099
Reaction score
11,414
I missed that before from Hustler... But I'm curious, why are we more talented than the Giants? I don't see that at all.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Future;2839193 said:
Other than the fact that Mosely is normally an idiot...why not just say that it IS one of the top tandems in the league.

A) it is the best
B) saying "perhaps one of" is no different than saying above average. .... this drives me nuts.

We went through this a few weeks ago, too, when Mosley said it would be "getting carried away" to call Witten and Bennett the top tandem in the NFL. He's never said who he thinks is better, but there's not another team that's even close.

There are nine teams who had two tight ends with at least 20 catches last season, and none of the others have anyone even close to Witten -- he had 23 more catches and 307 more yards than any of the others. And if you look at the other highly productive tight ends last season, none of them had a backup as productive as Bennett (20 catches, 283 yards, 14.2 YPC, four TDs). Tony Gonzalez's backup had seven catches for 63 yards and no TDs. Dallas Clark's backup had 19 catches for 166 yards (8.7 YPC) and no TDs. Chris Cooley's backup had eight catches for 50 yards and one TD. It's not even a contest.

Mosley either hasn't even considered who might be better, or he's consciously slighting Witten and Bennett. There's simply no other possibility.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,871
Reaction score
15,969
Chocolate Lab;2839425 said:
I missed that before from Hustler... But I'm curious, why are we more talented than the Giants? I don't see that at all.

More talented? Probably not.. Just as talented? Yup.

Mosley and tons of other people forget Dallas was actually better late last year then NYG were.


The Giants made the playoffs based on that retardedly hot start and then were not even average after that.

The offense without Burress... who they are so ready to replace... was abysmal. They scored 9 on the Dallas defense for instance.
The Giants have a heck of an OL and I'll pass them a tie-breaker based on that alone but the WRs, the Def Coord, and the RBs took a hit this off-season. Dallas has a 3-headed monster at RB like NYG USED to... and Dallas clearly has the better TE situation. I'd say Dallas is in better shape to replace an elite WR. They have the only WR on either team to ever bust 1000 yards and they the best TE in football.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Chocolate Lab;2839425 said:
I missed that before from Hustler... But I'm curious, why are we more talented than the Giants? I don't see that at all.

How many of the Giants' players would start for us?

Manning? No.
Jacobs? Probably not.
Hedgecock? Probably.
Boss? No.
Diehl? No.
Seubert? Maybe.
O'Hara? No.
Snee? Probably, but moved to left guard.
McKenzie? Maybe.
Hicks? No.
Smith? Probably not.

Out of 11 offensive starters, that's two probables, two maybes, two probably nots and five definite noes.

On defense, I'm not going to differentiate between 3-4 and 4-3 positions.

Tuck? Yes.
Canty? Yes.
Bernard? No.
Umenyiora? Yes.
Clark? No.
Pierce? Not after James' 2008 season.
Boley? Probably ahead of Spencer.
Ross? No.
Webster? Probably ahead of Jenkins/Scandrick.
Phillips? Not yet.
Johnson? No.

That's three yesses, two probables and six noes on defense.

Feagles? No.
Tynes? No.
Bradshaw (KR)? Not ahead of Felix.
Hixon (PR)? Maybe, depending on who returns punts for us.

So with three noes and one maybe on special teams, that's a total of three yesses, four probables, two maybes, two probably nots and 14 noes out of 26 starting positions.

If you go into depth, the only backups better than ours are Kiwanuka and probably Robbins.

I don't think there's any question we have more overall talent than the Giants. We're probably among the top five teams in terms of talent. It's execution that has cost us, not a lack of talent.
 
Top