187beatdown;2807205 said:
Actually when Newman is healthy, he's the better corner. Asante is the better playmaker.
Here is what the Pro Football Weekly survey said about
Newman (rated 5th):
"After being bothered by groin and abdominal issues, Newman finished the 08' season with a flourish. Intercepting 4 passes in the final 7 games. Has good ball skills,
elite speed and
thrives in man coverage".
Here is what the publication said about
Samuel (rated 3rd):
"One of the
premiere zone cornerbacks with a
knack for making big plays. Was able to succeed in Philly out of NE's cover 2 scheme".
One player (Newman) "thrives in man coverage" and has "elite" speed.
The other player (Samuel) is called a "premiere zone cornerback" and "has a knack for making big plays".
Newman and Samuel are two different types of players.
If you want the
zone cornerback, then take Samuel.
If you want the
man to man cornerback with
elite speed, then take Newman. Plus, Newman is the best slot defender in the NFL and can shadow very fast, quick WRs all over the field while in man to man coverage. You can put him on big, fast WRs llike Terrell Owens (in his prime) or bigger players, too.
I agree with you. I think Newman is the better player, and I've written in detail and compared the two players and what they bring to the table. Samuel has made a name for himself by making big plays, and his play in the playoffs helped him.
Furthermore, Samuel played in a heavy zone scheme in NE while Newman has played in a heavy man to man scheme during his 6 year career. Samuel played cover 3 and cover 2 while in NE. That scheme helped him get the big plays. It allowed him to be more aggressive and jump routes from just outside the numbers to the sidelines. Plus, I do believe the Eagles played Samuel in primarily a zone role in their zone blitz scheme.
Champ Bailey is another guy who benefited from an aggressive scheme.
I'm not saying Samuel or Bailey should be diminished for how they have been played, but I think it's important for the debate to recognize that the two players have been used differently. Samuel and Bailey have given up more deep and intermediate throws in their careers when compared to Newman and it shows up in their YPA and it has shown up on the scoreboard as well. Samuel, like Bailey, comes from a scheme that encouraged him to gamble. The trade off is interceptions for giving up more bigger plays.
Which player you prefer probably depends on the scheme you run and how you are going to play them.
Newman has been the master at
preventing the big play during his six year career. Plus, Newman does have 20 career interceptions while letting the game or interceptions come to him. I prefer Newman's more conservative approach, and Wade Phillips' scheme has and will continue to set him up for some more opportunities for interceptions.
Newman offers extra value with his elite slot play where he has to defend the entire field in man to man coverage. Plus, Newman's elite speed, quickness, burst, agility, and leaping ability allows you deploy him in man to man coverage and bring heat. Newman's outstanding cover skills put heat on the offense. Newman shrinks the field, and if you keep throwing the ball towards him, he has shown that he will make you pay.