ESPN says TO #3 most indispensable player in the NFL

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
We Cowboy fans frequently discuss which player's loss would injury the Cowboys the most. The 5 players most frequently discussed include: TO, Romo, Witten, Newman & Ware. Frankly I'd have TO & Romo in a tie. We gotta have both. But ESPN's pick of TO points out the obvious weakness in our offense TO. It's not that he's just an elite WR, it's also because we've not nothing much in the way of WRs behind him. Yes, Witten is a top TE & Crayton is a pretty good #3, but if TO goes down we've got no #1, #2 or any other viable WR who can even began to get the job done. Our passing attack grinds to a halt because Romo would have to resort to dink and dunk 5 yard passes and invariably we get too many offensive penalties to score too often. Austin must step it up and show he's got the ability to really help our passing game, etc. Now if Glenn can give us 1 more year that would be a big help but Glenn can't carry the load if TO unable to play.

According to ESPN's Chadihi,

Owens is the #3 most indispensable player in the league behind Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. Just a few years ago he was one of the most hated players in the league, ostracized by the media and it was widely publicized that the Eagles would be a much better team without him. As BTB regular doomsday would say, the transformation is complete. After years of being thought of as a locker room cancer it has become painfully obvious how critical he is to the Cowboys' success. If he was healthy at the end of the year in 2007 who knows how things might have gone in January.
Chadiha says that without Owens life gets a whole lot tougher for Romo and Co.
Terrell Owens, WR, Dallas
Say what you will about T.O. and his controversial history, but you have to admit this much: He's the key to that high-powered offense in Dallas. We saw that much when a high ankle sprain made him ineffective in an NFC divisional playoff loss to the New York Giants. When Owens is healthy, he makes life easier on tight end Jason Witten, wide receiver Patrick Crayton and quarterback Tony Romo. When he's off the field, the Cowboys' passing game isn't nearly as scary ... and neither is the rest of that team.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,845
Reaction score
16,867
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Yeah, it would be tough if T.O. were to go down...but, let's all not even think of that.

Think positive thoughts....

;)
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
Funny, just a few weeks ago he was the guy that coaches didn't want.

And while he may not be the best player on the team, Romo is far more indispensable than Owens.




YAKUZA
 

ABQcowboyJR

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,424
Reaction score
494
Yeah have to say I would much rather loose TO then Romo. But the point is still valid. Players like Austin do need to step up and be ready should we call on them. To bad that guy can't catch
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,823
Reaction score
112,689
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Locker room cancer at #3?

Quick, someone forward this to Skip "the village idiot" Bayless.
 

The Panch

New Member
Messages
4,184
Reaction score
0
Yakuza Rich;2154091 said:
Funny, just a few weeks ago he was the guy that coaches didn't want.

And while he may not be the best player on the team, Romo is far more indispensable than Owens.
That's debatable. T.O. is one of the all-time great receivers and still in his prime. Id say we'd have a below average without either of them.
 

Deep_Freeze

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,225
Reaction score
3,436
Others see this, don't know why we don't. Sure, we lose TO or Romo, it is a disaster, no other way to slice it. Saying we will be fine without either is just an excerise in nothingness.

But no matter how you look at it, they are equal. Romo isn't any more indispensable than TO, especially without a healthy Glenn. TO is just that much better than any other WR we have. You can look at when he was hurt, we were a disaster. Here is something for you, TO is better at his position than Romo is. That isn't saying Romo is bad, he is top 3 or 4, that is saying how good TO is in comparison to his competition, and I'm just tired of us underestimating that here.

Would him going down for us for an extended period of time have the same effect as it did for the Eagles when he left?? Denial would say not, but the answer is probably.
 

gazmc_06

New Member
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
0
Deep_Freeze;2154167 said:
Others see this, don't know why we don't. Sure, we lose TO or Romo, it is a disaster, no other way to slice it. Saying we will be fine without either is just an excerise in nothingness.

But no matter how you look at it, they are equal. Romo isn't any more indispensable than TO, especially without a healthy Glenn. TO is just that much better than any other WR we have. You can look at when he was hurt, we were a disaster. Here is something for you, TO is better at his position than Romo is. That isn't saying Romo is bad, he is top 3 or 4, that is saying how good TO is in comparison to his competition, and I'm just tired of us underestimating that here.

Would him going down for us for an extended period of time have the same effect as it did for the Eagles when he left?? Denial would say not, but the answer is probably.

Agreed completely.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Yakuza Rich;2154091 said:
Funny, just a few weeks ago he was the guy that coaches didn't want.

And while he may not be the best player on the team, Romo is far more indispensable than Owens.




YAKUZA

You could say that about Flozell Adams and Jason Witten. Without Witten last year Owens would have been double and triple teamed all the time.

I think one of the main reasons Romo can make that claim is because he only has Brad Johnson behind him. Johnson was just a game manager his whole career, but today he isn't even as good as he was a few years ago. His arm is weaker among other things. That leaves Romo on a raft by himself out at sea as the Cowboys QB.
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
sago1;2154014 said:
We Cowboy fans frequently discuss which player's loss would injury the Cowboys the most. The 5 players most frequently discussed include: TO, Romo, Witten, Newman & Ware. Frankly I'd have TO & Romo in a tie. We gotta have both. But ESPN's pick of TO points out the obvious weakness in our offense TO. It's not that he's just an elite WR, it's also because we've not nothing much in the way of WRs behind him. Yes, Witten is a top TE & Crayton is a pretty good #3, but if TO goes down we've got no #1, #2 or any other viable WR who can even began to get the job done. Our passing attack grinds to a halt because Romo would have to resort to dink and dunk 5 yard passes and invariably we get too many offensive penalties to score too often. Austin must step it up and show he's got the ability to really help our passing game, etc. Now if Glenn can give us 1 more year that would be a big help but Glenn can't carry the load if TO unable to play.

According to ESPN's Chadihi,

Owens is the #3 most indispensable player in the league behind Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. Just a few years ago he was one of the most hated players in the league, ostracized by the media and it was widely publicized that the Eagles would be a much better team without him. As BTB regular doomsday would say, the transformation is complete. After years of being thought of as a locker room cancer it has become painfully obvious how critical he is to the Cowboys' success. If he was healthy at the end of the year in 2007 who knows how things might have gone in January.

Chadiha says that without Owens life gets a whole lot tougher for Romo and Co.
Terrell Owens, WR, Dallas

Say what you will about T.O. and his controversial history, but you have to admit this much: He's the key to that high-powered offense in Dallas. We saw that much when a high ankle sprain made him ineffective in an NFC divisional playoff loss to the New York Giants. When Owens is healthy, he makes life easier on tight end Jason Witten, wide receiver Patrick Crayton and quarterback Tony Romo. When he's off the field, the Cowboys' passing game isn't nearly as scary ... and neither is the rest of that team.​

Adrian Peterson better be in the top 5.....cause he is the Minnesota offense. I hope I get the top pick in the draft this year, cause he will be mine again.
 

dueyhemlock

Hog Hunter
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
383
TO is somewhat indispensable just because we don't a true #2 WR that can step into the #1 WR position and produce as a #1. Hopefully one day we will resolve that problem.

Our ship only floats because of Romo. With TO, our offense can be dominate but we should be able to survive if he went down. Romo is good at seeing the field and spreading the ball around. Our games will just be alot tighter.

Let's keep our fingers crossed and play ball.
 

gazmc_06

New Member
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
0
The entire list from ESPN goes:

1. Brady
2. Manning
3. Owens
4. Peterson
5. Antonio Gates
6. Haynesworth
7. Westbrook
8. Thomas
9. Hasselbeck
10. E. Manning
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Deep_Freeze;2154167 said:
Others see this, don't know why we don't. Sure, we lose TO or Romo, it is a disaster, no other way to slice it. Saying we will be fine without either is just an excerise in nothingness.

But no matter how you look at it, they are equal. Romo isn't any more indispensable than TO, especially without a healthy Glenn. TO is just that much better than any other WR we have. You can look at when he was hurt, we were a disaster. Here is something for you, TO is better at his position than Romo is. That isn't saying Romo is bad, he is top 3 or 4, that is saying how good TO is in comparison to his competition, and I'm just tired of us underestimating that here.

Would him going down for us for an extended period of time have the same effect as it did for the Eagles when he left?? Denial would say not, but the answer is probably.

Sorry, have to disagree.

I like TO and he is incredibly important to the success of our team, he has been a great acquisition. But QB is, and always wll be more important than WR, especially when you dont have a quality long term answer (and when I say long term, I mean more than a game or so) as his backup. If Romo goes down in game one and misses the season, we're probably a .500 team at best, and almost assuredly wont make the playoffs. If TO goes down in game one, we're still a playoff team, though maybe not a championship team.

David
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
gazmc_06;2154577 said:
The entire list from ESPN goes:

1. Brady
2. Manning
3. Owens
4. Peterson
5. Antonio Gates
6. Haynesworth
7. Westbrook
8. Thomas
9. Hasselbeck
10. E. Manning

pretty lousy list IMO...I agree with some but disagree on several

David
 

Romo2Dez4six

Touchdown!!!!
Messages
2,022
Reaction score
13
IMO he is the third on our team. 1 Romo 2 Witten(if it wasn't for Witten TO would be so covered it wouldn't be funny) 3 TO:)
 

gazmc_06

New Member
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
0
^TO was covered like that in Philly and still put up numbers, Witten is important but not as important as TO IMO.
 
Top