final 53

[Bob Sacamano]

QB: Romo, Johnson, Moore
RB: Julius, Barber, Thompson
FB: Hoyte, Anderson

TE: Witten, Fasano, Curtis

WR: TO, Hurd, Austin
WR: Terry Glenn, Crayton, Stanback

LT: Flo, Free
LG: Kosier
C: Gurode, Berger
RG: Bigg
RT: Colombo, McQ, Marten

26

Defense

LDE: Spears, Bowen
NT: Ferg
RDE: Canty, Hatcher, Ratliff

LOLB: Ware, Glymph
LILB: Bradie, Bobby
RILB: Akin, Burnett
ROLB: Ellis, Spencer

LCB: Newman, Glenn, Jones
RCB: Henry, Reeves, Butler

FS: Hamlin, Watkins
SS: Roy, Keith

24

Special Teams

K: Folk
P: McBrier
LS: Lodaceur

3

 

[Crown Royal]

Why would we IR grammatica?

 

[Hostile]

Why would we IR grammatica?

Because people can't let the midget go.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Why would we IR grammatica?

keep him from a rival team, idk

 

[Crown Royal]

Because people can't let the midget go.

Agenda alert!


Personally I like him, but we'd sooner cut him.

 

[blindzebra]

Moore is playing his way easily to the PS.

Where is Hatcher?

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

WR: TO, Hurd, Austin
WR: Terry Glenn, Crayton, Stanback

Are you saying Hurd and Austin would be ahead of Glenn and Crayton????

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Moore is playing his way easily to the PS.

Where is Hatcher?

we trade him for 2 1sts...

I forgot about him, he makes the team, Moore doesn't

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Are you saying Hurd and Austin would be ahead of Glenn and Crayton????

no, you see, an NFL team usually starts 2 Wrs, so I have 2 slots for them, and Hurd is TO's primary backup and Crayton is Glenn's, TO and Glenn are the starters

not that hard to figure out

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

no, you see, an NFL team usually starts 2 Wrs, so I have 2 slots for them, and Hurd is TO's primary backup and Crayton is Glenn's, TO and Glenn are the starters

not that hard to figure out

I see it now.
isn't the traditional way to list by order of ability?
For instance: T.O. Glenn (starters) followed by the depth chart: Crayton, Hurd, etc.

 

[blindzebra]

Funny I bad mouth Moore and he starts doing well...yeah, I'm the anti-jinx.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

I see it now.
isn't the traditional way to list by order of ability?
For instance: T.O. Glenn (starters) followed by the depth chart: Crayton, Hurd, etc.

I guess you could do it that way, but my idea is to list the backups behind who they are backing up, or who I would think they would be the backups to

 

[Teague31]

think matt moore made the team tonight... no way he would sneak through waivers at this point.

 

[Hostile]

Funny I bad mouth Moore and he starts doing well...yeah, I'm the anti-jinx.

LOL

anti-Midas touch.

 

[dallasfan]

keep him from a rival team, idk

you can't just stick a player on IR. the player has a right to seek a second opinion before they go on IR. I'm pretty sure in the end the player cannot be put on IR without their consent.

 

[AbeBeta]

you can't just stick a player on IR. the player has a right to seek a second opinion before they go on IR. I'm pretty sure in the end the player cannot be put on IR without their consent.

actually, he'd be happy to go on b/c it would guarantee his salary for the year AND he could get a release when he was ready to play. In fact, if he's still hurt, he may force an IR decision by refusing to take an injury settlement.

No team is ever going to keep someone on IR to keep him from playing for another team. That's how you end up screwing yourself in the free agent market.

 

[silver]

think matt moore made the team tonight... no way he would sneak through waivers at this point.

really? i disagree. me thinks he clears waivers easily. if not him bartell will which are about the same IMO. and there's always good ol drew henson out there to meet your practice squad needs.

 

[CaptainQuint]

really? i disagree. me thinks he clears waivers easily. if not him bartell will which are about the same IMO. and there's always good ol drew henson out there to meet your practice squad needs.

I disagree with your disagreement but, if Moore's not 1 of 53, I hope he plays somewhere else this year.