Daillest88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,552
- Reaction score
- 15,398
Crawford had 29 pressures and 5 sacks tacking on double teams with one arm... Please tell me what were you guys expecting with Hayden next to him?
how do you have to spend more than you have? that makes no sense.
Crawford had 29 pressures and 5 sacks tacking on double teams with one arm... Please tell me what were you guys expecting with Hayden next to him?
Double teams. Same thing people said about Hardy.
Yeah, Crawford and Hardy were both eating double teams all day.
There's a minimum spending level that must be met over 2013 to 2016. 89% of the cumulative salary cap must be spent as cash over that period of time. They are not there. They are short by $21M-$22M.
They have $12M in cap space.
The extra cap space may not be for free agency exclusively. They may be looking to extend Fredricks.
The extra cap space may not be for free agency exclusively. They may be looking to extend Fredricks.
Sounds like Eric Berry money.....
So how do they spend $22m with only $12m? Is that what you're saying cause the restructures? To free up $22m?
As far as the restructures, both contracts were designed for restructuring. It was fairly obvious.
Is there a contract that this statement couldn't be applied to?
Crawford had 29 pressures and 5 sacks tacking on double teams with one arm... Please tell me what were you guys expecting with Hayden next to him?
No, but the Cowboys have started to design their contracts so that it is much easier to restructure. In essence, the player is getting multiple signing bonuses. The initial one and then "restructuring bonuses".
This isn't a new thing for Dallas. They haven't "started" anything.
As far as the multiple signing bonuses, provided converted base salary is paid upon conversion (it makes sense it would), couldn't the same outcome be achieved at the time contract is written?
Lastly, what is it that you see in Tyron's contract that specifically tips you off that the contract was meant to be restructured?