OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,899
- Reaction score
- 22,430
I don’t disagree with you there. I’m mostly reacting to Helman’s mischaracterization of what NFL teams find valuable (the stuff they look for in a “resume”) as part of his daily routine to hype up any and everyone in the Cowboys organization.
Right now, there’s a gold rush for offensive coaches who are familiar with a particular scheme or have had success with particular organizations that they want to emulate. THAT’S what teams are looking for in a resume, not how long someone has been coaching a certain position.
Mike Kafka’s value is in the success he has had as QB coach for the Chiefs and the fact that he has two years of first-hand experience in how that offense is run. Kellen Moore does not have that. Two completely different resumes.
No, Kafka’s perceived value is in the success his QB and team has had, which isn’t necessarily the same as the success he has been responsible for. Again the same head coach and system resulted in a career year for Alex Smith last year, so the success this season can’t just be attributed to a change at QB coach. And, realistically, how does a fan even quantify the impact of a QB coach? Is he a great QB coach when the QB has a quality season, and a bad QB coach when the same QB has an off season?
But even aside from all that, even if we were to ignore all other variables that affect how well a QB does in a given year and assume Moore and Kafka were working under identical conditions with no difference in the quality of the offensive scheme, or play calling or head coach or OC or talent of the QB, and assumed that the only difference was the quality of the QB coach, at the end of the day it still just means Kafka has one year over Moore - a single year - and that’s not much history to support the notion they have a “completely different” resume.