For Poop and Giggles

[Kaika]

Lamest poll evah. Are we passing notes in the 5th grade or something?

Ugh, If you read the directions it said write yes if your for TO and NO if your not.
I guess I should have explained the question better, for some .
But if you want to keep TO on the team vote yes and if not vote no.

And I guess I should have stated that if your not interested just ignore the poll.
Thats what an intelligent person would do.

Your sarcasm isn't necessary just because your on the internet.

 

[Kaika]

I am Pro Dallas Cowboys.

TO has nothing whatsoever to do with it. I can live with him or without him. Prior to this year the guy was a model player IMO. This year he became a distraction. We hang onto him and he shuts up, I am all for it. We hang onto him and he doesn't shut up, I am against it. It is entirely about the attitude he brings. His production has never been an issue with me.

I understand what your saying but as we all know TO doesn't and has never shut up.So that being said,considering what has gone on this year, do you think we should dump him now or hang on to him and see if we can change him into a productive TEAM player.

 

[Hostile]

I understand what your saying but as we all know TO doesn't and has never shut up.So that being said,considering what has gone on this year, do you think we should dump him now or hang on to him and see if we can change him into a productive TEAM player.

I'm on record as saying I would dump him UNLESS he agrees to shut up.

 

[Kaika]

I'm on record as saying I would dump him UNLESS he agrees to shut up.

Thank You

 

[Kaika]

I know it was an amateurish attempt at a poll but as you can see by the title of the thread ,it was all done in jest.

So, Can the sarcasm.
It's not at all necessary.

 

[bbgun]

What would have called it??

"Just for grins and giggles."

 

[jackrussell]

I think we need a poll as to whether we should have anymore TO polls.

 

[Kaika]

I think we need a poll as to whether we should have anymore TO polls.

I just started this thread to find out individually who wanted TO on the team and who didn't.

I've been seeing some here say,that they want him and support him one day and a few weeks later I think I see them take a different stance and say he's a cancer, then flip flop back to support him agin..

Thats all I wanted to see is who, if anyone, flip flops on TO.

This was not a poll it was more like a survey for me.

If you don't want to participate, then just ignore the thread.

Sarcasm isn't necessary.

Geez, some guys just don't read whats been posted.

 

[DallasEast]

man.






















"Do you like T.O.? Yes or No."



This has to be the best Terrell Owens nonsense yet. Thank you. Bless you. Excuse me.





















"Do you like T.O.? Yes or No."

 

[jackrussell]

Sarcasm isn't necessary.

Good luck with that.

But when you ask "Do you like TO? Yes or No." reminds of those notes we used to pass in school.

 

[Kaika]

man.






















"Do you like T.O.? Yes or No."



This has to be the best Terrell Owens nonsense yet. Thank you. Bless you. Excuse me.





















"Do you like T.O.? Yes or No."

Hate to burst your bubble but I never posted the poll "Do You like TO"
Someone else decided to highjack the thread .

It wasn't me , and I don't appreciate it..

So have your laughs at some one else' s expense.

If thats the way things go around here ,I'll be careful the next time on what I post.

 

[Bleu Star]

I am pro Bleu.

 

[DallasEast]

Hate to burst your bubble but I never posted the poll "Do You like TO"
Someone else decided to highjack the thread .

It wasn't me , and I don't appreciate it..

So have your laughs at some one else' s expense.

If thats the way things go around here ,I'll be careful the next time on what I post.

Exactly how did someone "hijack" your thread?

1. Did they change the text of your post?

or

2. Did they add a poll to your thread?

or

3. Did they do both?

If the answer is #1 and/or #3, then, yes, someone hijacked your thread. However, if the answer is #2, then, no, no one hijacked your thread.

 

[THUMPER]

Terrell Owens is a nice guy but I don't want him on my team.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

Any one care to hazard a guess as to how I voted?

 

[AtomicDog]

I'm on record as saying I would dump him UNLESS he agrees to shut up.

Uh, I think the TO genie has been loose from the bottle in big D. TO won't shut up now.

Too bad. I wanted TO to work out in Dallas. But alas no.

 

[bbgun]

I'm on record as saying I would dump him UNLESS he agrees to shut up.

He'll shut up like I'll stop downloading vintage Bulgarian erotica. Not .. gonna .. happen.

 

[NextGenBoys]

I dont like him, but I want him back in 09

 

[Daudr]

I'll say this. I hated the TO signing, but he won me over the first two years. Now if all the stories this last year are true, then he's back on my crap list. However, with Ed Werder and some of the other "media" around here I wonder if most of it is pure crap on their part.

One thing is 100% accurrate - ESPN is no longer about reporting the news, they are about creating entertainment and getting viewers whatever the cost and this seems to be the case for at least the last 2-3 years.