FWST: BLOG: Jay Glazer weighs in on Ray Lewis, Cowboys

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
5Countem5;2638803 said:
Not as much as the gullibility of some of you, why?
You are laughing over the comment "sources?"

That's pathetic.
 

5Countem5

Benched
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2638804 said:
You are laughing over the comment "sources?"

That's pathetic.

Pathetic to laugh at "sources"?

I also laugh over references to Bigfoot, UFO and ghosts. Same thing
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
5Countem5;2638806 said:
Pathetic to laugh at "sources"?

I also laugh over references to Bigfoot, UFO and ghosts. Same thing
I didn't stutter.
 

5Countem5

Benched
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2638809 said:
Pathetic.

Yep, ever since you started this little exchange...


I always laugh at the word or idea of "sources" , you know that but were looking for a little back and forth to start the day so keep it up, I got 30 minutes before an 8 mile race, I might as well be doing that as anything.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
5Countem5;2638811 said:
Yep, ever since you started this little exchange...


I always laugh at the word or idea of "sources" , you know that but were looking for a little back and forth to start the day so keep it up, I got 30 minutes before an 8 mile race, I might as well be doing that as anything.
The idea that anyone would laugh at a Sports Illustrated reporter having sources is pathetic. There is no other way to describe it. He is a professional reporter with access to players and coaches that you can only dream of and you decide to do your Internet skeptic act over the idea he has sources.

The agenda is over the top and pathetic. I hit the nail right on the head. I could have done it with bad aim and whacked out on Nyquil.
 

5Countem5

Benched
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
0
Hostile;2638812 said:
The idea that anyone would laugh at a Sports Illustrated reporter having sources is pathetic. There is no other way to describe it. He is a professional reporter with access to players and coaches that you can only dream of and you decide to do your Internet skeptic act over the idea he has sources.

The agenda is over the top and pathetic. I hit the nail right on the head. I could have done it with bad aim and whacked out on Nyquil.

I believe that an SI reporter might have sources but I really doubt there is anything of sourcing to this. Just guesses based on others "source" reporting. Witten and Romo have been clear in their desire to have him stay yet Banks "guesses" they want him gone. That sort of speaks for the whole article, while it is probably the most even-handed to both sides- crap is still crap.

I guess we will wait and see, TO will stay and all of you and the media can repeat over and over again that, "Well , they really thought about cutting him".
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
everyone keeps making the assumption that you have to be an in-your-face leader to be effective...I look around the league and I really don't see any of that, even from Ray Lewis. Ray Lewis makes his teammates passionate and fires them up...haven't really seen him "get into it" with anyone on the sidelines or anything.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,205
With the new stadium coming in this move just makes even more sense for Jerry to make to sell tickets.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
Hostile;2638804 said:
You are laughing over the comment "sources?"

That's pathetic.

If you could disable his emoticons, that'd be swell. Then again, how would he tell the rest of us that he's "attempting" humor?
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
bbgun;2638889 said:
If you could disable his emoticons, that'd be swell. Then again, how would he tell the rest of us that he's "attempting" humor?

Oh I see what you did there. For a moment I thought you were talking about dcfanatic. My bad.
 

This is Our Year

Ohama, Kill, 52 is the Mike
Messages
1,987
Reaction score
743
Im not so sure Lewis is a fit here. Granted he is probably better than James, but to have both James and Lewis on the field wouldn't work. Our LBs in pass coverage would be horrific and we might lose Burnett he was our only decent coverage LB to begin with. If we didn't have Bradie I would say Ray would make more sense.
:star:
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
This is Our Year;2639083 said:
Im not so sure Lewis is a fit here. Granted he is probably better than James, but to have both James and Lewis on the field wouldn't work. Our LBs in pass coverage would be horrific and we might lose Burnett he was our only decent coverage LB to begin with. If we didn't have Bradie I would say Ray would make more sense.
:star:

I think this has some merit. With the high amount of sub packages you are seeing less and less of three down ILBs. I think we need a big NT before filling the hole at ILB in the 3-4 although I rate the ILB high.
 
Top