FWST: No comment on T.O. from Stephen Jones

Mr Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,612
Reaction score
32,654
I caught up with Cowboys vice president Stephen Jones at the Mavs game last night and tried to ask him about the rumors and speculation regarding his stance on the Terrell Owens controversy.

According to a recent report, Jones was expected to lobby his dad/owner Jerry Jones to ship Owens out of Dallas.

Asked about his role in the looming Owens' decision, Jones said "no comment."

Now Jones should be savvy enough to know that a "no comment" often gives one the assumption the question at hand is true and the person doesn't want to talk about it. If it wasn't true the person would simply say so.

Could Jones' "no comment" mean that he just doesn't want to talk about the Owens situation, considering that a gag order has been issued at the Cowboys' Valley Ranch headquarters?

Perhaps.

But he also could easily shoot down a false report that has him fingered as the guy who will help usher Owens out the door without betraying anybody's trust.

You decide.

And of course there's the little matter of the recent blog by Jason Cole of Yahoo Sports from the Pro Bowl where he says Jerry Jones has had several players over at his Highland Park home in recent days trying to see if the Owens situation can be worked out internally.

The only problem I have with Cole's report is that "sources" at the Pro Bowl also told him that Owens refuses to talk to other members of the offense in the huddle, in the lockerroom and at team functions.

Considering who is at the Pro Bowl _ tight end Jason Witten, center Andre Gurode, tackle Flozell Adams and linebacker DeMarcus Ware _ it's not hard to connect the dots who one of the sources might be.

The problem with that opinion the Owens doesn't talk to members off the offense is his seemingly good relationships with receivers Roy Williams and Patrick Crayton and running back Marion Barber.

It's also true that Gurode was one of the players in Owens' corner during the snitch controversy toward the end of the season, according to my sources.

There is no question that Owens is having a problem with Witten and quarterback Tony Romo. But the notion that he doesn't talk to other players on offense is not true.

With Owens it's always something.

One school of thought says the Cowboys need to get rid of Owens because he's a bad influence on Williams, Crayton and Barber.

Now we have a report from sources at the Pro Bowl that the Cowboys need to get rid of Owens because he doesn't talk to other players on offense.

It can't be both.

Clarence E. Hill Jr.
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,714
Reaction score
4,888
Gee..... wonder who the source is.

Gurode is in Owens' corner. Adams doesn't talk.


I guess its possible Ratliff/Ware talked. But they aren't in the huddle with Owens
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Oh, noes! He won't talk to the media about it so he must be getting cut!
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
Vintage;2629015 said:
Gee..... wonder who the source is.

Gurode is in Owens' corner. Adams doesn't talk.


I guess its possible Ratliff/Ware talked. But they aren't in the huddle with Owens

who cares who it is...if it isnt this it will be something else

its time to start correcting this dysfunctional situation...they did the right thing by kicking Trashman Jones to the curb...they arnt going to bring back Turd Johnson...go all the way and get rid of Owens too

it wont fix everything, but something has to be done to start making this a "team" again and not just a collection of individuals who arnt collectively working towards one goal
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
dbair1967;2629023 said:
who cares who it is...if it isnt this it will be something else

its time to start correcting this dysfunctional situation...they did the right thing by kicking Trashman Jones to the curb...they arnt going to bring back Turd Johnson...go all the way and get rid of Owens too

it wont fix everything, but something has to be done to start making this a "team" again and not just a collection of individuals who arnt collectively working towards one goal
You're right. It's never going to go away. Owens could be 100% innocent 100% of the time (not saying he was in '08) and the media wouldn't stop.

Still, you have to ask if his performance outweighs the fact that the media will never stop. Right now, I still think it does.
 

hendog

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,533
Reaction score
547
dbair1967;2629023 said:
who cares who it is...if it isnt this it will be something else

its time to start correcting this dysfunctional situation...they did the right thing by kicking Trashman Jones to the curb...they arnt going to bring back Turd Johnson...go all the way and get rid of Owens too

it wont fix everything, but something has to be done to start making this a "team" again and not just a collection of individuals who arnt collectively working towards one goal

Preach it brother! Can I get an Amen! Amen.
 

Audiman

New Member
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
Mr Cowboy;2629012 said:
Asked about his role in the looming Owens' decision, Jones said "no comment."

Now Jones should be savvy enough to know that a "no comment" often gives one the assumption the question at hand is true and the person doesn't want to talk about it. If it wasn't true the person would simply say so.

Could Jones' "no comment" mean that he just doesn't want to talk about the Owens situation, considering that a gag order has been issued at the Cowboys' Valley Ranch headquarters?

Perhaps.

actually, it probably just means he doesn't want to talk about it.

The only problem I have with Cole's report is that "sources" at the Pro Bowl also told him that Owens refuses to talk to other members of the offense in the huddle, in the lockerroom and at team functions.

so, if he talks to other players, it gets blown up. if he doesn't talk to other players, it still gets blown up. I really wish the media wouldn't suck.

Considering who is at the Pro Bowl _ tight end Jason Witten, center Andre Gurode, tackle Flozell Adams and linebacker DeMarcus Ware _ it's not hard to connect the dots who one of the sources might be.

or they could just be "anonymous", since that's what the media likes to do these days.

There is no question that Owens is having a problem with Witten and quarterback Tony Romo. But the notion that he doesn't talk to other players on offense is not true.

according to Witten, the "problems" they were having was very exaggerated. this came straight from a Witten interview.

With Owens it's always something.

with the media, they always find something. even if it's not a big deal at all, it gets blown out of proportion.
 

EveryoneElse

Active Member
Messages
3,877
Reaction score
0
Audiman;2629033 said:
actually, it probably just means he doesn't want to talk about it.



so, if he talks to other players, it gets blown up. if he doesn't talk to other players, it still gets blown up. I really wish the media wouldn't suck.



or they could just be "anonymous", since that's what the media likes to do these days.



according to Witten, the "problems" they were having was very exaggerated. this came straight from a Witten interview.



with the media, they always find something. even if it's not a big deal at all, it gets blown out of proportion.


Bill Parcell's would be proud. You have not been sucked.
 

5Countem5

Benched
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
0
I cannot believe ANYONE reads this crap and believe it has ANT credibility.
 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
Mr Cowboy;2629012 said:
I caught up with Cowboys vice president Stephen Jones at the Mavs game last night and tried to ask him about the rumors and speculation regarding his stance on the Terrell Owens controversy.

According to a recent report, Jones was expected to lobby his dad/owner Jerry Jones to ship Owens out of Dallas.

Asked about his role in the looming Owens' decision, Jones said "no comment."

Now Jones should be savvy enough to know that a "no comment" often gives one the assumption the question at hand is true and the person doesn't want to talk about it. If it wasn't true the person would simply say so.

Could Jones' "no comment" mean that he just doesn't want to talk about the Owens situation, considering that a gag order has been issued at the Cowboys' Valley Ranch headquarters?

Perhaps.

But he also could easily shoot down a false report that has him fingered as the guy who will help usher Owens out the door without betraying anybody's trust.

You decide.

And of course there's the little matter of the recent blog by Jason Cole of Yahoo Sports from the Pro Bowl where he says Jerry Jones has had several players over at his Highland Park home in recent days trying to see if the Owens situation can be worked out internally.

The only problem I have with Cole's report is that "sources" at the Pro Bowl also told him that Owens refuses to talk to other members of the offense in the huddle, in the lockerroom and at team functions.

Considering who is at the Pro Bowl _ tight end Jason Witten, center Andre Gurode, tackle Flozell Adams and linebacker DeMarcus Ware _ it's not hard to connect the dots who one of the sources might be.

The problem with that opinion the Owens doesn't talk to members off the offense is his seemingly good relationships with receivers Roy Williams and Patrick Crayton and running back Marion Barber.

It's also true that Gurode was one of the players in Owens' corner during the snitch controversy toward the end of the season, according to my sources.

There is no question that Owens is having a problem with Witten and quarterback Tony Romo. But the notion that he doesn't talk to other players on offense is not true.

With Owens it's always something.

One school of thought says the Cowboys need to get rid of Owens because he's a bad influence on Williams, Crayton and Barber.

Now we have a report from sources at the Pro Bowl that the Cowboys need to get rid of Owens because he doesn't talk to other players on offense.

It can't be both.

Clarence E. Hill Jr.

wow he got all that from a "no comment" :laugh1:

must be a slow news day
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
If the Cowboys get rid of TO and the problems still persist, who will everybody blame then?
 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
Boyzmamacita;2629047 said:
If the Cowboys get rid of TO and the problems still persist, who will everybody blame then?

lol :bow:
 

5Countem5

Benched
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
0
"Now Jones should be savvy enough to know that a "no comment" often gives one the assumption the question at hand is true and the person doesn't want to talk about it."

Can you believe some hack actually wrote this in a story?

I never thought I could think less of journalists, but as always, another comes along and proves me wrong.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Boyzmamacita;2629047 said:
If the Cowboys get rid of TO and the problems still persist, who will everybody blame then?
I say we find out as soon as possible.
 

EveryoneElse

Active Member
Messages
3,877
Reaction score
0
Boyzmamacita;2629047 said:
If the Cowboys get rid of TO and the problems still persist, who will everybody blame then?



There's always shoulders for the blame to sit on.

I can't believe how much the media influences fans perception of a player.
 

JonJon

Injured Reserve
Messages
11,262
Reaction score
733
Mr Cowboy;2629012 said:
I caught up with Cowboys vice president Stephen Jones at the Mavs game last night and tried to ask him about the rumors and speculation regarding his stance on the Terrell Owens controversy.

According to a recent report, Jones was expected to lobby his dad/owner Jerry Jones to ship Owens out of Dallas.

Asked about his role in the looming Owens' decision, Jones said "no comment."

Now Jones should be savvy enough to know that a "no comment" often gives one the assumption the question at hand is true and the person doesn't want to talk about it. If it wasn't true the person would simply say so.

Could Jones' "no comment" mean that he just doesn't want to talk about the Owens situation, considering that a gag order has been issued at the Cowboys' Valley Ranch headquarters?

Perhaps.

But he also could easily shoot down a false report that has him fingered as the guy who will help usher Owens out the door without betraying anybody's trust.

You decide.

And of course there's the little matter of the recent blog by Jason Cole of Yahoo Sports from the Pro Bowl where he says Jerry Jones has had several players over at his Highland Park home in recent days trying to see if the Owens situation can be worked out internally.

The only problem I have with Cole's report is that "sources" at the Pro Bowl also told him that Owens refuses to talk to other members of the offense in the huddle, in the lockerroom and at team functions.

Considering who is at the Pro Bowl _ tight end Jason Witten, center Andre Gurode, tackle Flozell Adams and linebacker DeMarcus Ware _ it's not hard to connect the dots who one of the sources might be.

The problem with that opinion the Owens doesn't talk to members off the offense is his seemingly good relationships with receivers Roy Williams and Patrick Crayton and running back Marion Barber.

It's also true that Gurode was one of the players in Owens' corner during the snitch controversy toward the end of the season, according to my sources.

There is no question that Owens is having a problem with Witten and quarterback Tony Romo. But the notion that he doesn't talk to other players on offense is not true.

With Owens it's always something.

One school of thought says the Cowboys need to get rid of Owens because he's a bad influence on Williams, Crayton and Barber.

Now we have a report from sources at the Pro Bowl that the Cowboys need to get rid of Owens because he doesn't talk to other players on offense.

It can't be both.

Clarence E. Hill Jr.

No comment.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
I highly doubt Stephen Jones could convince Jerry to get rid of TO even if Stephen wanted to.

The fact that Jerry is having players over at his house to talk about the TO situation tells me all I need to know.

Jerry will make the decision and it doesnt matter what Stephen or Wade or Garrett or anybody thinks.

80/20 TO is back for 09............IMO
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
The only problem I have with Cole's report is that "sources" at the Pro Bowl also told him that Owens refuses to talk to other members of the offense in the huddle, in the lockerroom and at team functions.

Considering who is at the Pro Bowl _ tight end Jason Witten, center Andre Gurode, tackle Flozell Adams and linebacker DeMarcus Ware _ it's not hard to connect the dots who one of the sources might be.

The problem with that opinion the Owens doesn't talk to members off the offense is his seemingly good relationships with receivers Roy Williams and Patrick Crayton and running back Marion Barber.

It's also true that Gurode was one of the players in Owens' corner during the snitch controversy toward the end of the season, according to my sources.

There is no question that Owens is having a problem with Witten and quarterback Tony Romo. But the notion that he doesn't talk to other players on offense is not true.


i dont buy the part about sources at the pro bowl saying that T O needs to go, because they had witten on, and they asked him about romo, t o and witten and he said it was blown way out of proportion, and everything is ok, just need to focus, get healty with no injuries like last year and execute

now, if it wasnt one of the defensive players, and i know its not ratliff because he doesnt talk to media mostly, and ware isnt in the offensive huddle, and it wasnt gurode like someone mentioned, since he was in T O's corner at the end of the year. Didnt sound like witten either, so the only person that leaves is Flozell.

and remember the article said sources at the pro bowl, so i dont buy this

now i do think their is a problem,

but its not coming from where it is being said,
 

superonyx

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,478
Reaction score
15,836
Beast_from_East;2629076 said:
I highly doubt Stephen Jones could convince Jerry to get rid of TO even if Stephen wanted to.

The fact that Jerry is having players over at his house to talk about the TO situation tells me all I need to know.

Jerry will make the decision and it doesnt matter what Stephen or Wade or Garrett or anybody thinks.

80/20 TO is back for 09............IMO

I agree with you.

However, the fact that Jerry is having players over to his house to talk about TO means TO is what the media are claiming him to be. A Distraction.
When the team plays like they have i dont know if we can take more distractions. Notice Jerry isnt having players over his house to talk about Kyle Kosier or Jay Ratliff.

Does that mean we cant win with him? I dont know and like i have said before. I will have to agree with whatever the team decides since i am not on the inside and only know what is reported.
 
Top