wileedog;3259260 said:
It has nothing to do with that. Its people constantly making the claim that Wade has accomplished more than Parcells when Wade inherited a playoff team with an All Pro QB and Parcells inherited Quincy Carter.
Its an apples to oranges comparision yet it pops up daily in multiple threads, and now even Wade is making the dishonest comparison to try and prop himself up.
The 9-7 year was Romo's first starting and he wasn't even in there for 1/3 of the season.
Bill had that "All Pro QB" on the roster the entire time he was here. He chose to go with a slew of retread QBs as opposed to putting Romo in there. Would Romo have been ready? Who knows? But Bill still had the guy on the team.
You're giving Bill a pass because Romo only started 10 games in 2006? (which btw is way more than 1/3 of the season)
And conveniently left out is that the team completely spiraled out of his control in Wade's 2nd season coming off 13-3 and led to one of the worst losses in franchise history.
"Spiraled out of control" = 9-7?? What do you call losing 4 out of the last 6 in 2003, or going 6-10 in 2004 after 10-6, or going 9-7 back to back in 2005 and 2006?
All I'm saying is it's interesting how you're spinning this depending on who you like better.
Wade did a nice job here this year and I give him credit for that, but again he still has more than Bill had, particularly in Romo finally maturing, and he still hasn't won anything but 1 Wild Card game - followed by another pummeling to end the season.
Romo has matured under Wade. And the one wild card game is more than Bill won here.
The real difference is it seems like the team is genuinely getting better. I didn't feel like that was the case when Bill left. Yeah, we had a young QB, but he was still something of an unknown. On the other hand, we had gone 9-7 twice in a row and 6-10 before that.