Garrett feuding with Dallas media?

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
6,347
My dad was telling me that Garrett was pissed and he and Witten lit into Butler on the sidelines.
Thanks for the info. There's been a thousand times that I wanted the coach to lay into a player or bench a player or even cut a player for something they did, and was glad, after the fact, that that didn't happen (at least publicly). I have seen JG show emotion on the sideline, but it's pretty rare. I really believe that in team meetings, he calls a spade a spade. There are some occasions where an on-the-spot reaction is warranted. Personal fouls (emotional penalties) fall into that category, IMO. Most of the time, though, it isn't needed.
 
Last edited:

VACowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,006
Reaction score
3,896
The main reason the Dallas media is upset is because they get national exposure when big stories or topics pop up for the Cowboys. They get calls for interviews with popular sports radio stations and programs and some get television video interviews or audio time via sound bytes. That's how a lot of Dallas reporters have ended up working with national media and even ones working in Dallas for national media got promoted to more prominent positions.

The problem is that the local media has made it a point for years to attempt to appear "objective" to national media when talking about the Cowboys and they do that by insulting and attacking Cowboys players, coaches and ownership, and they also regularly divulge so-called "what is being said behind closed doors" gossip via anonymous team sources.

If the Cowboys and/or Garrett are cutting them off or limiting the flow of information, it's not just annoying to them, it's a major problem for their future careers.

I really don't blame Garrett or the Cowboys for reacting this way. The local Dallas media needs to be reminded that the internet makes them less relevant now and if they want the same access and respect as national media, they need to appreciate the relationship they have with the Cowboys.

LIKE*1000
 

Garrettop

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
2,121
I wouldn't be surprised if this may be more related to the "brewing QB controversy" stories popping up, and he knows that more success with Dak will only increase their frequency. It's a threat to Jason's career and the cohesion of the lockerroom to have this become a thing. I know I'd be pre-emptively hostile.
 

cowboys1985

Well-Known Member
Messages
429
Reaction score
506
Amen on Watkins and Taylor. In many ways they are exemplary of the ****-stirring ambulance chasers who have composed the Dallas sports media for decades, as least the drama queens who've covered the Cowboys.

As a Cowboy's fan from Chicago, I was never too familiar with the Dallas media. I only knew of the ones that wrote for ESPN Dallas's Cowboys beat. I think it was JTT, Broaddas, Watkins, MacMahon, and Archer. Of those I only respected and read Broaddas and Archer. It was the only time I felt like I was getting the facts as they were as opposed to being packaged with some sort of spin.

Right now the people I read/follow is Eatman, Broaddas, Archer, Machota and Charean Williams.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The main reason the Dallas media is upset is because they get national exposure when big stories or topics pop up for the Cowboys. They get calls for interviews with popular sports radio stations and programs and some get television video interviews or audio time via sound bytes. That's how a lot of Dallas reporters have ended up working with national media and even ones working in Dallas for national media got promoted to more prominent positions.

The problem is that the local media has made it a point for years to attempt to appear "objective" to national media when talking about the Cowboys and they do that by insulting and attacking Cowboys players, coaches and ownership, and they also regularly divulge so-called "what is being said behind closed doors" gossip via anonymous team sources.

If the Cowboys and/or Garrett are cutting them off or limiting the flow of information, it's not just annoying to them, it's a major problem for their future careers.

I really don't blame Garrett or the Cowboys for reacting this way. The local Dallas media needs to be reminded that the internet makes them less relevant now and if they want the same access and respect as national media, they need to appreciate the relationship they have with the Cowboys.

Somehow, this never has occurred to me. But you're exactly right. It kind of helps put the locals in context, too.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I wouldn't be surprised if this may be more related to the "brewing QB controversy" stories popping up, and he knows that more success with Dak will only increase their frequency. It's a threat to Jason's career and the cohesion of the lockerroom to have this become a thing. I know I'd be pre-emptively hostile.

That's sort of what I was trying to say earlier. It's not too hard to guess what it's going to be like two-three weeks down the road if the team keeps playing well. It doesn't hurt to have reigned them in a little bit now, because by that point it will be far too late.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Broaddus took a couple of shots at garrett on the cowboys break radio show today.

what he say?

It was in regards to Garrett giving his former teammate and Buck the 'scoop' on Tyron's back. Broaddus said he should have asked Garrett in the presser if it were true that he gave a tidbit to the national media, and then said it's fine if Garrett wants to act this way, but it's on him and on the media in general to start asking harder questions.

As if Jason Garrett is going to be stumped by something Brian Broaddus squeezes out regarding what he said to Troy Aikman and Joe Buck. Jason would drive right around that question and any follow ups like he was in slow motion. I don't understand why the local media thinks they're entitled to a story like that, anyway. Sure, it makes sense that they get first crack at most stories due to proximity alone, but the team hardly owes them right of first refusal on every back injury inside scoop. None of the fans care who broke that particular story, anyway.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Back in the day of no internet, the news came out of the Dallas media via the Weekly etc. Now they are less prominent as the internet has grown to basically instant worldwide notification with social media.

But the Dallas media gets the privilege of going to the facilities and meeting with the team so they still have great influence. Not sure why Garrett is in a feud but chances are its over something said or even unsaid that was inappropriate.
 

VACowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,006
Reaction score
3,896
As a Cowboy's fan from Chicago, I was never too familiar with the Dallas media. I only knew of the ones that wrote for ESPN Dallas's Cowboys beat. I think it was JTT, Broaddas, Watkins, MacMahon, and Archer. Of those I only respected and read Broaddas and Archer. It was the only time I felt like I was getting the facts as they were as opposed to being packaged with some sort of spin.

Right now the people I read/follow is Eatman, Broaddas, Archer, Machota and Charean Williams.

I live in central Virginia, so when I listen to local media (which isn't often) it's all Skins all the time. And while they are some of the most delusional professionals in the world when it comes to reporting and commenting on sports, in my experience they reserve their venom for their opponents and almost never present a negative Commanders rumor as fact. My biggest gripe with the writers in Dallas is the way they actively seek Cowboys negativity and sensationalize the smallest little bit of nothing, rumor or not. I bet there are more unnamed sources in the Metroplex than anywhere else in the world.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
Something is up.

He gave the SF media information he didn't give the locals on dez, then he gave Buck and Aikman the info on the bulging disc on smith which he also withheld from the locals.

If I had to answer questions from Clarence HIll and Mac Engle on a Daily basis I would be the most miserable person in the world.

At the same time, Archer, Sham, Laufenberg, scales and some others have always been fair and honest with him so I am not sure how to think about it.

I will say I like that no info comes out, but then if you turn around and give out the info you are hiding to out of town media it kind of defeats the purpose.
His coaching has gotten more aggressive, too.

He's throwing his red flag with regularity..

he's going for 4th downs surprisingly..

and I love the new Air High 5's..

Beats the hand clap and butt slaps...
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
I live in central Virginia, so when I listen to local media (which isn't often) it's all Skins all the time. And while they are some of the most delusional professionals in the world when it comes to reporting and commenting on sports, in my experience they reserve their venom for their opponents and almost never present a negative Commanders rumor as fact. My biggest gripe with the writers in Dallas is the way they actively seek Cowboys negativity and sensationalize the smallest little bit of nothing, rumor or not. I bet there are more unnamed sources in the Metroplex than anywhere else in the world.

Well, it's obvious Garrett sees an injury or a potential one and is reacting. Normally he isn't aggressive so my guess is someone done somebody wrong. And he may consider 'unnamed sources' as hurting the club.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,835
Reaction score
20,691
Say what you want about Garrett as a coach, but he's a stand up guy who usually has his emotions in check. If he's this pissed, I'll just assume someone in that room did something extremely inappropriate or unethical that got under Garrett's skin.

Sports media is trash at the moment. Rip into them, Garrett.
 

CouchCoach

Staff member
Messages
41,122
Reaction score
74,959
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It was in regards to Garrett giving his former teammate and Buck the 'scoop' on Tyron's back. Broaddus said he should have asked Garrett in the presser if it were true that he gave a tidbit to the national media, and then said it's fine if Garrett wants to act this way, but it's on him and on the media in general to start asking harder questions.

As if Jason Garrett is going to be stumped by something Brian Broaddus squeezes out regarding what he said to Troy Aikman and Joe Buck. Jason would drive right around that question and any follow ups like he was in slow motion. I don't understand why the local media thinks they're entitled to a story like that, anyway. Sure, it makes sense that they get first crack at most stories due to proximity alone, but the team hardly owes them right of first refusal on every back injury inside scoop. None of the fans care who broke that particular story, anyway.
They think they're entitled because that's the way this was set up from the beginning. Two writers, Frank Luksa and Blackie Sherrod, were very objective and had a balance for the locals to feel OK about their teams and they did this for the Rangers as well. When August would get here and it was time for the Rangers to break our hearts again, they would try and soften the blow as they went through it with us. They did the same with the Cowboys through the bad and good times.

When Booger arrived, he began an all out obvious campaign to get the media on his side and get as much gratis promotion as he could get. So he bent over backwards to schmooze the locals to try and limit the damage firing Landry did only those two didn't bite. Plenty did, Hansen and Galloway led the buffet line and had plenty of company. Blackie nicknamed Booger Smiley and it wasn't an endearing nickname as they knew his motives and were insulted that he could buy them with free booze and food. Luksa once commented to another writer for the DMN that he wouldn't shake hands with Jones with a watch on his wrist or buy a used car from him.

But this access to the Cowboys was a new gift they'd been given and there wasn't anyplace they couldn't go. They got spoiled with Booger's media access making them lazy and just assumed they were the chosen few. They got national bylines and interviews because they were "in the know". Lady JaGa just threw that in their faces with the SF and he may have done it on purpose. I don't think he was happy last year when the media was in his own locker room driving one of his players to the point of exploding. Like most of us feel, that's pushing it too far. But he doesn't control the locker room, Booger does and makes his own players open game for these people.

They acted like children when he blind sided them but hadn't Booger spoiled them to that point? They had every reason to believe they would get the story first. A word of caution to those vermin, He's got that team at 3-1 and is well liked in the community, better be careful how they try to play hardball as he's smarter than every one of them. Lady JaGa needs to develop he's own "look". Landry had it for players and Parcells had it for reporters, especially that moron Steve Dennis. Just stare at them in silence for a few seconds without that trademark smile and maybe let out an exaggerated breath.
 
Top