Garrett supporters pointed out Garrett's stats too

[leeblair]

Daks QB Rating:

2017 - 86.6
2018 – 96.9
2019 – 99.7

Performed worse each year?

There you go with useless stats.
But we all watched the games.
Dak's stats were an illusion. He played poorly when the games were in contention, but padded his stats when the opposing defenses were in prevent mode because they were so far ahead.

 

[leeblair]

So, he was capable of handling pressure in 2016 but not in 2019?

He wasn't under pressure in 2016. He stood calmly behind the best line in football, with the opposing defenses keying on Elliott, against weaker teams.
2019 was the toughest schedule he's faced, and he couldn't measure up.

 

[OmerV]

There you go with useless stats.
But we all watched the games.
Dak's stats were an illusion. He played poorly when the games were in contention, but padded his stats when the opposing defenses were in prevent mose because they were so far ahead.

Lol, it’s amazing how the stats that are useless are the ones that don’t fit your story.

 

[leeblair]

Lol, it’s amazing how the stats that are useless are the ones that don’t fit your story.

The ONLY stat that matters is whether or not the Cowboys won.
Dak supporters throw out stats because it's all they have.
But the fact is that Dak has played poorly for three consecutive seasons in games that mattered. And even in 2016 he choked vs the Packers with a loaded team.

 

[OmerV]

He wasn't under pressure in 2016. He stood calmly behind the best line in football, with the opposing defenses keying on Elliott, against weaker teams.
2019 was the toughest schedule he's faced, and he couldn't measure up.

Lol, right, a rookie QB thrust unexpectedly into a starting role after spending much of training camp 3rd on the depth chart had no pressure. Lol.

And, I guess you were unaware the Cowboys played the #3,#4, #5, #6 and #9 scoring defenses that year. Also the #1, #5 and #10 teams sacking the QB.

there are those pesky stats again, but I’m sure you will declare those meaningless too. Again, it’s amazing how the stats that don’t fit Your story happen to be the meaningless ones.

 

[OmerV]

The ONLY stat that matters is whether or not the Cowboys won.
Dak supporters throw out stats because it's all they have.
But the fact is that Dak has played poorly for three consecutive seasons in games that mattered. And even in 2016 he choked vs the Packers with a loaded team.

Lol, well, you are seriously contradicting yourself. You dismissed what Dak did in 2016, and now you are saying winning is the only stat that matters, yet the Cowboys won 13 games in 2016.

 

[Typhus]

And Dak is 40-24 as a starter with very good stats.

That’s why he’ll make over $30m next year.

Keep crying about it while Dak kicks your *** at life.

Your just way over board agenda driven...
Maybe get another hobby bro, just saying,, I see hate filled posts on both sides and I tend to stay back, but you drive the bus for Pro Dak.

 

[Gaede]

There you go with useless stats.
But we all watched the games.
Dak's stats were an illusion. He played poorly when the games were in contention, but padded his stats when the opposing defenses were in prevent mode because they were so far ahead.

Stats are an illusion? Isn't that the exact opposite of what stats are? Stats are proof, man.

 

[johneric8]

During the 13 miserable years that we were forced to endure the incompetence of Jason Garrett, his supporters repeatedly pointed out the stats of the offense. Garrett's offenses would rack up big yards on passing plays, but because he ignored the run game, drives repeatedly stalled in the red zone when the field shortened and receivers couldn't get open.
We heard how much the players loved Garrett, and how they never quit on him. We heard time and time again how the players believed in him.
Yet every year ended in disappointment, and he wasted years of the fans lives and the careers of many stars. 8-8 was Garrett's record more often than not, yet we heard that we were trolls for demanding that he be fired.
We were even told that we should be happy with an 8-8 record.
Sound familiar?
The danger of this mentality continuing is real. Garrett 2.0 is in the house.

Here's an inconvenient truth for your analogy ridden post.

Garrett never should of been a head coach. Jerry did all he could to buy him a chance at success but he failed and had over 10 years to do it.

Dak on the other hand as a player has had very good success playing quarterback in not only college but in the nfl.

Garrett's overall resume most likely won't get him hired again for same position, but in terms of Dak, most teams would be happy with him as their own qb.

In other words, eye test failed...

 

[pansophy]

This is the same argument Dak supporters are making for him, despite his failure to make the Cowboys better.
Still 8-8.

We had Aikman and yet from 1996 to 2000 we were never better than 10-6. I remember him getting booed. There is only so much 1 guy can do. If we are going to get rid of a mentality it should be that we have to have the best QB in the league to win. If Foles won Dak can.

 

[CowboyRoy]

oh, if you didn't know. lee is a an ardent garrett hater....

Well that rules out that he isn't a Cowboys fan. Anyone that hates Garrett has to be a huge Cowboys fan.

 

[leeblair]

We had Aikman and yet from 1996 to 2000 we were never better than 10-6. I remember him getting booed. There is only so much 1 guy can do. If we are going to get rid of a mentality it should be that we have to have the best QB in the league to win. If Foles won Dak can.

Aikman played poorly from 1996-2000. He wasn't even as sharp in 1995.
When Jimmy left, the discipline left.
But Aikman had already proven that he was the best.
Aikman also had concussion issues from the wars he had fought.
But the difference is that Aikman didn't choke under pressure. He was still a champion. He did what he could to make the Cowboys better. He would give the other players coaching on the field. They were still competitive because of Aikman.

Dak panics and makes bad decisions when things aren't going well. He doesn't drive the Cowboys to be better. If they fail, Dak seems to feel as if it's not his problem.

 

[big dog cowboy]

There you go with useless stats.

Useless stats? QB rating is the #1 stat used when talking about QB comparisons.

 

[leeblair]

Useless stats? QB rating is the #1 stat used when talking about QB comparisons.

And it means nothing when you are on the field.
Troy Aikman was one of the best to ever play the game; his career rating is 81.6.
Dak Prescott's is 97.
Dak isn't a fraction of the leader/quarterback Troy Aikman was.
Passer rating is a fake stat, made up for fans who don't understand the game in order to hype mediocre players.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

There you go with useless stats.
But we all watched the games.
Dak's stats were an illusion. He played poorly when the games were in contention, but padded his stats when the opposing defenses were in prevent mode because they were so far ahead.

Yet he had the highest numer of come back wins during the period.

So he has highest number if come back wins. But you say he couldn't come through..

Which is the truth? Proof?

 

[Hennessy_King]

During the 13 miserable years that we were forced to endure the incompetence of Jason Garrett, his supporters repeatedly pointed out the stats of the offense. Garrett's offenses would rack up big yards on passing plays, but because he ignored the run game, drives repeatedly stalled in the red zone when the field shortened and receivers couldn't get open.
We heard how much the players loved Garrett, and how they never quit on him. We heard time and time again how the players believed in him.
Yet every year ended in disappointment, and he wasted years of the fans lives and the careers of many stars. 8-8 was Garrett's record more often than not, yet we heard that we were trolls for demanding that he be fired.
We were even told that we should be happy with an 8-8 record.
Sound familiar?
The danger of this mentality continuing is real. Garrett 2.0 is in the house.

Garrett 1.
Never earned his job it was handed to him because of jerry's loyalty to his daddy jim garrett. He also snaked his way in by sabotaging the offense to get wade fired.
Garrett 2.
Iced his own kicker to lose a game and cost the team a playoff birth.
Garrett 3.
His RKG guys were glorified jags he allowed nepotism all throughout the locker room. Just look at the Romo Witten relationship that he allowed to divide his guys and get T.O. fired.

If you are trying to compare this with your thoughts of Dak its not even comparable. There are no stats to back up your claim that Dak is bad and should be gone. Now with Romo you would have been right I never believed in Romo after 2006 and parcells left. Wasted a whole decade on an above average QB that couldn't stay healthy and was not a leader. With 4 seasons under his belt and no help from his coaching staff or defense he has still been able to keep this team competitive.

 

[Jake]

Hey guys, what do you think of this draft pick Gavin Escobar? Can we get a bunch of new threads to kick that around?

Travis Kelce was taken 16 picks later. Still irks me. Almost as bad as drafting Phil Pozderac.

What were we talking about again?

 

[Kaiser]

Travis Kelce was taken 16 picks later. Still irks me. Almost as bad as drafting Phil Pozderac.

What were we talking about again?

Our 4th round pick, Safety Matt Johnson.

 

[garyo1954]

During the 13 miserable years that we were forced to endure the incompetence of Jason Garrett, his supporters repeatedly pointed out the stats of the offense. Garrett's offenses would rack up big yards on passing plays, but because he ignored the run game, drives repeatedly stalled in the red zone when the field shortened and receivers couldn't get open.
We heard how much the players loved Garrett, and how they never quit on him. We heard time and time again how the players believed in him.
Yet every year ended in disappointment, and he wasted years of the fans lives and the careers of many stars. 8-8 was Garrett's record more often than not, yet we heard that we were trolls for demanding that he be fired.
We were even told that we should be happy with an 8-8 record.
Sound familiar?
The danger of this mentality continuing is real. Garrett 2.0 is in the house.

So who do you want to be the Head Coach?

 

[black label]

Celebrate that Super Bowl trophy his stats earned.
We were 8-8, but his stats make it okay, right?
He threw the ball into the ground on 4th down, but his stats were good, right?

He almost threw it in the stands on a 4th and goal too lol

Celebrate that Super Bowl trophy his stats earned.
We were 8-8, but his stats make it okay, right?
He threw the ball into the ground on 4th down, but his stats were good, right?