Q_the_man;2334513 said:If our QB is getting killed back in the pocket, why isn't he using Max protect every now again.......I think if u give Romo an extra second here and there, our WRs can get open giving enuff time to manuever
Lifetimeboyzfan;2334587 said:Cut Romo and fire Garrett. Clearly neither one of them knows a thing about football.
Q_the_man;2334612 said:So it's OK for Romo to get hit 25 times is what ur saying..... Just saying.....u want ur QB to take punishment like that, I can truly understand you logic...
They were sending everything they had quite a bit of the time.joseephuss;2334582 said:Should you have to max protect against a 3 or 4 man pass rush?
No what I'm saying during a game an which ur QB is getting killed, sometimes u adjust and protect ur QB, Right or Wrong..... Now for ur logic of only rushing 3 or 4 man fronts, WOW that's what we do is rush 3 man then Ware makes 4 and by God they always use a extra back or TE to chip or Double team our outside rushers, correct me if I'm wrong.......Lifetimeboyzfan;2334628 said:And exactly how many games has that happened in? Speaking of logic, you aren't using much if you think going max protect against a four man rush is the way to go...
Q_the_man;2334648 said:No what I'm saying during a game an which ur QB is getting killed, sometimes u adjust and protect ur QB..... Now for ur logic of only rushing 3 or 4 man fronts, WOW that's what we do is rush 3 man then Ware makes 4 and by God they always use a extra back or TE to chip or Double team our outside rushers, correct me if I'm wrong.......