Giants sign Jacobs to 4yr/25 million (12.5 mill guaranteed)

ajk23az

Through Pain Comes Clarity
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
422
http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2009/02/new_york_giants_reach_longterm.html

New York Giants reach long-term deal with Brandon Jacobs
by Mike Garafolo/The Star-Ledger
Wednesday February 25, 2009, 5:35 PM
William Perlman/The Star-Ledger

Jacobs is now signed as a Giant through 2012.
The Giants have reached an agreement with running back Brandon Jacobs on a four-year, $25-million deal, Jacobs' agent, Justin Schulman of Athletes First, has confirmed. Schulman declined to provide specifics, but someone familiar with the contract said more than half the total money is guaranteed and Jacobs will be paid $15 million in the first two years of the deal."Brandon is ecstatic to continue his career with the New York Giants," Schulman said. "We appreciate the Giants' investment in Brandon and especially acknowledge the effort put in by (assistant GM) Kevin Abrams. We're excited to keep Brandon in Giants blue for years to come."

The Giants had placed the franchise tag on Jacobs on Feb. 13. They had until July to talk about a long-term contract. Signing Jacobs now allows them to lower his cap number for this upcoming season from $6.621 million and create more space to use in free agency and perhaps on a new deal for QB Eli Manning. It's unclear what Jacobs' new 2009 cap number is, but it's certainly lower than the previous figure.
More to come.
MG
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
BigDFan5;2653790 said:
7 years 45 million 15/16 guaranteed
not bad. too long and too much but if it's spread out correctly it shouldn't hurt us.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Rampage;2653800 said:
not bad. too long and too much but if it's spread out correctly it shouldn't hurt us.

it's so long, that you can almost spread it across Ron Brace's fat ***

almost
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
BigDFan5;2653790 said:
7 years 45 million 15/16 guaranteed

19 mill of that contract is in the last 3 years.

Over the first four Barber got 4 years for 26 mill with a 16 mill guarantee

Jacobs is 4 years 25 mill with "more than half guaranteed"

These are pretty similar deals, Jacobs just didn't get BS years on the back end.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
AbeBeta;2653803 said:
19 mill of that contract is in the last 3 years.

Over the first four Barber got 4 years for 26 mill with a 16 mill guarantee

Jacobs is 4 years 25 mill with "more than half guaranteed"

These are pretty similar deals, Jacobs just didn't get BS years on the back end.


Thank you sire I wasnt sure about the details :D
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
AbeBeta;2653803 said:
19 mill of that contract is in the last 3 years.

Over the first four Barber got 4 years for 26 mill with a 16 mill guarantee

Jacobs is 4 years 25 mill with "more than half guaranteed"

These are pretty similar deals, Jacobs just didn't get BS years on the back end.

I was going to say the same thing, I think it'll take some doing for Barber to see the end of his deal as currently written.
 

Mash

Active Member
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
0
Barber will never see the end of that contract....

Look at how many players are released just because of their contracts.
 

Tom [Giants fan]

Active Member
Messages
737
Reaction score
106
CowboyFan74;2653780 said:
Over paid, his wheels are falling off.

Are you kidding? He will only be 30 when that contract ends. It will probably be the only one he gets from the Giants but he is only in his mid 20's. And he shares carries with other RB's so it isn't like he is carrying the ball 35 times a game. Even with Ward gone, Danny Ware is expected to get some of those carries with the other one's going to Bradshaw.
 

AmericasTeam31

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,253
Reaction score
32
Tom [Giants fan];2654145 said:
Are you kidding? He will only be 30 when that contract ends. It will probably be the only one he gets from the Giants but he is only in his mid 20's. And he shares carries with other RB's so it isn't like he is carrying the ball 35 times a game. Even with Ward gone, Danny Ware is expected to get some of those carries with the other one's going to Bradshaw.

Yet he is always hurt... He's missed 10 starts in the last two years since Tiki retired... And that is while averaging in the neighborhood of 20 carries per game... Chances are, he'll be on IR by week 12 this season too... Overpaid, and overrated seems accurate to me. They should do what they need to do to keep Ward, even if it means losing Jacobs. Just my two cents...
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
I actually figured Jacobs would get a little more and I'm surprised he didn't try and get a lot more.

I'm not saying he would be worth it just figuring he'd be one of those guys trying to get an insane deal.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
yeah, he could have gone somewhere else and gotten more but they franchised him, so he was probably going to have to play there this year anyway.
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Tom [Giants fan];2654145 said:
Are you kidding? He will only be 30 when that contract ends. It will probably be the only one he gets from the Giants but he is only in his mid 20's. And he shares carries with other RB's so it isn't like he is carrying the ball 35 times a game. Even with Ward gone, Danny Ware is expected to get some of those carries with the other one's going to Bradshaw.

Most RBs peak at Jacob's current age.

Emmitt Smith, one of the most durable RBs ever, had his most productive season when he was 26.

I would be very surprised if Jacobs ever improves on the numbers he's already put up. History is against it.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
That sucks. I was hoping they would break the bank on him.

That just proves he is stupid as it comes. The man was franchised then he agreed to that deal.
 

dmq

If I'm so pretty, why am I available?
Messages
7,436
Reaction score
941
TheCount;2654285 said:
yeah, he could have gone somewhere else and gotten more but they franchised him, so he was probably going to have to play there this year anyway.

Does the contract include getting Burress back to open up those wide running lanes? He was average once that offense couldn't spread the defense. I think he realizes this. He would be a 1 and done if he went to the Raiders.
 
Top