Give Me Your Thoughts on Play Calling

Sportsbabe

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,968
Reaction score
5,039
At first I thought the NFL had outlawed running the ball:eek: I was like "Bill, you're asking for our gunslinger to throw an INT. Give him some time to settle down." But Bill knew his guy. He didn't need no stinking time to settle down. It worked out alright. But it had me worried the entire first half. I really enjoyed the aggressive play calling in the 2nd half.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Sportsbabe;1130687 said:
At first I thought the NFL had outlawed running the ball:eek: I was like "Bill, you're asking for our gunslinger to throw an INT. Give him some time to settle down." But Bill knew his guy. He didn't need no stinking time to settle down. It worked out alright. But it had me worried the entire first half. I really enjoyed the aggressive play calling in the 2nd half.

I think when players are executing the play calling is more aggressive because you not constantly trying to overcome negative plays. 1st qrt was a bit sloppy with Dallas committing penalties but as we made fewer mistakes the play calling was allowed to be aggressive because we were in good down and distance situations
 

THUMPER

Papa
Messages
9,522
Reaction score
61
Sportsbabe;1130687 said:
At first I thought the NFL had outlawed running the ball:eek: I was like "Bill, you're asking for our gunslinger to throw an INT. Give him some time to settle down." But Bill knew his guy. He didn't need no stinking time to settle down. It worked out alright. But it had me worried the entire first half. I really enjoyed the aggressive play calling in the 2nd half.

I thought the play calling was good for the first time all year (in several years actually). Romo gives us so many options that weren't available with Bledsoe because he can make his reads quicker, gets the ball out quicker, and can buy time for the receivers to get open with his mobility.

That means teams can't simply blitz to a spot and/or work at stuffing the run because Drew wasn't going to beat them with his arm.

We had a very balanced attack last night with 38 rushes and 36 pass attepmts. The combination of Jones and Barber gives us a very nice running game and as we saw yesterday, Romo seems to be able to get more players invoilved in the passing game and was able to convert 3rd and longs by throwing to receivers other than Glenn or Owens.

For the life of me I can't understand why we went with Bledsoe to start the season knowing his limitations. With Romo at the helm it opens up our offense to utilize ALL of its weapons instead of just a couple.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,309
Reaction score
32,715
Sportsbabe;1130687 said:
At first I thought the NFL had outlawed running the ball:eek: I was like "Bill, you're asking for our gunslinger to throw an INT. Give him some time to settle down." But Bill knew his guy. He didn't need no stinking time to settle down. It worked out alright. But it had me worried the entire first half. I really enjoyed the aggressive play calling in the 2nd half.

Remember when Cowboys fans were clamoring for Parcells to loosen the offense last year?

Well, the reason, IMO, he didn't is that he knew what would occur with Bledsoe manning such an offense. We successfully did it against the Eagles in the first game last year. But I don't think you can trust Bledsoe with such a game plan.

Romo is different and now I think we'll see a pass-to-set-up-the-run offense.

I'm expecting at least three more plus 30 point games by the Cowboys and maybe even another 40 plus game. :D
 

dfense

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,109
Reaction score
6,542
Sportsbabe;1130687 said:
At first I thought the NFL had outlawed running the ball:eek: I was like "Bill, you're asking for our gunslinger to throw an INT. Give him some time to settle down." But Bill knew his guy. He didn't need no stinking time to settle down. It worked out alright. But it had me worried the entire first half. I really enjoyed the aggressive play calling in the 2nd half.
Well, they said before the game Parcell's was going to be in on the play calling.
 

Cowboy4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,189
Reaction score
4,494
You know, I doubt the play calling changed very much at all. Its very simple, instead of Neg Plays, the O was making Pos plays,, better execution at all levels.. more wr out in the pattern because they didn't have to max protect, and a QB that looked at option 2 and 3.. and got rid of the ball. The play calling didn't change.. same coach's, same philosphy, it amazing what ONE player can mean to an O.
 

AmishCowboy

if you ain't first, you're last
Messages
5,134
Reaction score
569
I thought we were aggressive on offense for the First time this year.
 

Sportsbabe

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,968
Reaction score
5,039
Great comments guys. All the Drew apologists :) can say what they want. Another example of how he was holding us back (lol). For real though, it's good to see us get inside the red zone know we're gonna see something besides "fade right/fade left". My name is Sportsbabe and I'm a Romosexual. That 2-point conversion pass to Sherrell in the back of the end zone will be TDs in the coming weeks (hopefully).
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,947
Reaction score
23,096
When your qb is completing around 67% of his passes and your rbs are averaging 4+ your playcalling is going to look pretty good.
 

manimal

Member
Messages
75
Reaction score
1
speedkilz88;1130793 said:
When your qb is completing around 67% of his passes and your rbs are averaging 4+ your playcalling is going to look pretty good.

When your playcalling is good your qb completes 67% of his passes and your rbs average 4+.
:wink2:
 

Stautner

New Member
Messages
10,691
Reaction score
1
manimal;1130883 said:
When your playcalling is good your qb completes 67% of his passes and your rbs average 4+.
:wink2:

Regardless of who the QB, RB and O-line is or how well they execute.
 
Top