- Messages
- 101,901
- Reaction score
- 112,897
Actually both were rated highly and were reportedly equal in weight as far as grade at the time. Smith filled a need, for sure but it wasn't a need based pick.
Flo Adams left. We needed a LOT.
Actually both were rated highly and were reportedly equal in weight as far as grade at the time. Smith filled a need, for sure but it wasn't a need based pick.
No difference in those players to me, beside position. I think they both have the same effect on the field. I get what you're saying, though.
What if Bosa is drafted by us and busts? Is the Crow still served? Don't you have to wait to to fire up the crow roasting pit to see how Bosa performs first?
I get Tyron is a pro bowl and sometimes all pro LOT. But JJ has been the DPOY in 3 of his 5 years in the league. Only LT has 3 of those in the history of the game.
JJ's had some bad injuries. I think the way he plays, you get the longer career out of Tyron. Also, JJ's entire career is going to be wasted in Houston, sadly.
Actually Parcells talked about how they really liked Witten but he felt the center position had held him hostage too many times in the past. That's a clear need over BPA comment.
And I think it is somewhat revisionist history to say we were wrong on Johnson. He injured his knee in camp and needed microfracture surgery. Not many guys come back fully from that. Missed his whole rookie year. He wasn't the same after that (although he was pretty solid in his first year of play). It was a pick that was derailed by injury.
The primary problem with BPA is that teams often use a tiered approach to ranking players. Bosa, for instance, might be on the same tier as Tunsil and Ramsey, which means that all things being equal, the team takes the one that best fits its need.
The year that Dallas took Frederick, the team had several players in that same tier, it just happened to need a center worse.
According to which board? Or just stats hindsight? One could argue Smith was the BPA that happened to fill a need.
Wait, so your premise is when we hit big on a player it was because they were BPA, but when we missed on players it's because we didn't go BPA and instead only took them for need? Amazing how we couldn't hit on any need players, but boy those few BPA picks we made sure were something.
I can't wait to find out what Randy Gregory turns into so we know whether it was a need pick or BPA.
Actually he was the last one in the tier left a/k/a The Last Of The Mohicans.
Really? Witten we got in the third - we were shocked he was still on the board in the second, but we had a need a center so we took Al Johnson instead
So how is that BPA again?
I thought he was in the same tier as Escobar and Terrence Williams, but I could be remembering wrong.
NO. Do you not remember Jerry Jones calling him the last of the Mohicans?
Exactly
Revisionist history at its best
The Texans are 2-3 since 1999. We are 2-6 in that same time. I wouldn't point to them wasting a top players career and assume Tyron's going to end up better in that regard. Especially since they've never had a franchise QB and even with one for a decade, we still have the same number of playoff wins.