Good Basic 4-3 / 3-4 Comparison

LaTunaNostra

He Made the Difference
Messages
14,985
Reaction score
4
Part 1: The 3-4 vs. the 4-3 Defense

Mike Campbell - Scout.com
July 6, 2005 at 3:05am ET


When Chiefs fans heard the news that Gunther Cunningham may use a 3-4 defense on certain passing downs it raised more than a few eyebrows. For many, just a whisper of the 3-4 conjured up memories of the 1997 Falcon defense and the glory days of dominant Chiefs defenders.

Other fans have been left wondering what this means to Chiefs 4-3 defense. Does Kansas City have the personnel to run the 3-4 as their base defense? What are the differences between the two and which one is conventionally better?

I hope to answer all of those questions in this two part article. In part one we will discuss the basics of defense, defensive gaps, and the defensive line. In part two we will discuss the linebackers, the differences in basic philosophy, and the over all strength of the two schemes.


Defense 101

Before we delve too deep in to each defense lets take the time to discuss some of the basics. The names 3-4 and 4-3 refer to the alignment of the players who make up the front seven of the defense. The front seven consists of the linebackers and defensive linemen while the defensive backs (2 cornerbacks and 2 safeties) make up the portion of the defense referred to as the secondary.

On the front seven of a 3-4 scheme you have a nose tackle and two defensive ends on the line of scrimmage with four linebackers that can line up in a variety places. Conversely in a 4-3 you have two defensive tackles and two defensive ends on the line of scrimmage with three linebackers playing two to five yards off of the line of scrimmage.

The roles of the secondary are interchangeable between the two defensive fronts and they use their own set of terms to designate coverage (cover two, cover one, man-to-man, etc). However, let me also make it clear that the two halves of the defense are not independent of one another. In fact whatever the front seven is asked to do in a play call will usually effect the type of coverage that is called in secondary as well (this is especially true for the safeties).

Alignment and Gaps Assignment

When it comes to aligning a defense each player on the front seven will align himself with an offensive lineman, a tight end, or a gap between two players. Those defenders will also line up in various positions or "shades" that put them straight over a gap, a player, or either shoulder of a player. When coaches are drawing up game plans and designing defenses this is a very critical part of their strategy.

There is a standard system for counting shades and gaps, it starts with the offensive center and works its way out past the tight ends in both directions. The first alignment is the "zero technique" which is over the nose of the center and from there either shoulder of the center is a "one technique". The gap between the center and guards is called the "A gap" and then the inside shoulder of each guard is called the "inside two" or "two in". Nose up on the guards is a "two technique" and the alignment on their outside shoulders is the "three technique". The "B gap" is between the guards and the offensive tackles while the inside shoulders of the tackles are called the "inside 4" or "4 in". A regular "4 technique" is nose up on the offensive and the outside shoulder is the "5 technique". The "C gap" is between the tackle and tight end and the alignments on the tight end are "7" for his inside shoulder, a "6 technique" for head up, and a "9 technique" for his outside shoulder. Outside of the tight end is the "D gap" and lining up outside of the "D gap" is an "8 technique".

I know of three different ways this is taught throughout high schools and colleges but the method I discussed above by far is the most prevalent. Some coaches use a modified version and they don't skip numbering where gaps are present. So in that case the "A gap" would also be called a "2" technique and the inside shoulder of the guard would be considered a "3 technique".

Differences in Personnel - The Defensive Line

Outside of alignment, the most glaring difference between the 4-3 and 3-4 is the type of personnel involved. The biggest change that takes place from one defense to the other is along the defensive line.

As stated above the 4-3 defense uses two defensive tackles and the capabilities of those two players can vary from defense to defense. Most teams use a combination of skill sets on the interior of the defensive line. One defensive tackle usually plays a "3 technique" and his job is to shoot a single gap and disrupt things in the backfield. This player is usually a 300lb pass rusher with quick feet and good explosion. The Chiefs happen to use two of these "3 technique" type players in the starting lineup at the same time with Ryan Sims and Lional Dalton. When Warren Sapp played for Tampa Bay he was also this kind of player.

The second flavor of defensive tackle in a 4-3 tends to play more over the center in a 0 to 2 technique (many times this is the right defensive tackle). This defensive tackle is often a heavier more powerful player that will usually draw a double team from the center and guard. He is responsible for controlling one or both of the "A gaps" depending on where he is lined up. Some of the more successful 4-3 defenses in recent history have deployed two of these players in the middle of their defense at the same time. The Baltimore Ravens with Tony Saragusa and Sam Adams would be one example while the Chicago Bears with Keith Traylor and Ted Washington would be another.

In a 3-4 defense the defensive tackle position is called the nose tackle or nose guard (This name refers to his alignment over the nose of the center). This player has to be an immoveable object so you generally look for a guy who is at least 330lbs with great lower body strength. He is basically the same kind of player as the second defensive tackle we discussed above but he plays a more important role than his counterpart in the 4-3.

Unlike the defensive tackle of the 4-3, the nose tackle is the anchor of the 3-4. Any team that plans on running the 3-4 as their base defense needs to have a player that can play that position at a high level. The elite nose tackles should be able to fire out of a four point stance and take the center in to the backfield. It is imperative that he constantly draw a double team from the guard and center because should he fail to do so his inside linebackers will pay the price.

The Defensive ends are also very different between the two schemes. The defensive ends that play in a 4-3 tend to average 265 to 280lbs and are 6'3" to 6'7" tall. They must also posses a quick initial burst of speed as they are the primary player designated to rush the quarterback. Most of the time you find them lining up in a "5 technique" though it is not uncommon for them to shade to a "9 technique" should a tight end come to their side.

Though the 4-3 defensive end is the teams best pass rusher he also has an important responsibility on rushing downs. Unless there happens to be a line stunt called he has contain responsibilities on the "C" gap. This means he cannot be sucked inside on run support because it is his job to prevent the offense from turning the corner and getting up field on sweeps and bootlegs.

Since the 4-3 defensive end is based on speed and explosion rather than bulk and power, you don't see too many of them make a successful transition to the 3-4, at least not as a defensive end. For example, when the Atlanta Falcons switched to a 3-4 two years ago their previous standout defensive end Patrick Kerney became a liability because he wasn't stout enough to hold up against the run (Most right defensive ends would be best suited to handle duties as an outside linebacker in a 3-4).

In a 3-4 defense the defensive end is almost exclusively lined up at a "4 technique" or "5 technique". Personnel wise they are usually classified as "tweeners" because in a 4-3 they could handle duties at either the "3 technique" or left defensive end.

It should also be noted that not all 4-3 "3 technique" defensive tackles translate well in to 3-4 defensive ends. The Oakland Raiders discovered this in 2004 when their attempt at playing Warren Sapp at right defensive end failed miserably. Though he is one of the greatest "3 technique" defensive tackles of all time he is not built to go head to head with offensive tackles.

Most of the time the players that are recruited to play defensive end in a 3-4 are 6'3" to 6'5" tall and a chiseled 300 pounds. Kansas City's John Browning , Miami's Kevin Carter , and San Diego's Igor Olshansky are prime examples of the kind of player that usually plays this position.

In a 3-4 the defensive end has similar responsibilities to the nose tackle. Like his interior line-mate, the defensive end has to occupy blockers so the linebackers can roam free and make plays. They don't need to be sack artists or even rack up many tackles. All they need to do is make sure they are getting in the way of offensive linemen. Sadly, the defensive end of the 3-4 has the least glamorous job on defense because whenever they do their job well it winds up being the linebackers who get all of the credit.

Generally speaking most 3-4 defensive ends are not capable of playing the same position in a 4-3 because they lack the initial burst as a pass rusher. When you do see them in a 4-3 they are usually at left defensive end (or defensive tackle) and considered a two down player which means they are usually replaced by pass rush specialists on third downs.

On Thursday Mike Campbell will feature Part 2 of the differences between the 3-4 and the 4-3 defense.
 

LaTunaNostra

He Made the Difference
Messages
14,985
Reaction score
4
Part 2: The 3-4 vs. the 4-3 Defense

Mike Campbell - Scout.com
July 7, 2005 at 11:00pm ET


When Chiefs fans heard the news that Gunther Cunningham may use a 3-4 defense on certain passing downs it raised more than a few eyebrows. For many, just a whisper of the 3-4 conjured up memories of the 1997 Falcon defense and the glory days of dominant Chiefs defenders. In Part two of our report we go more in depth with the differences between the 3-4 and 4-3 defense.

Differences in Personnel - The Linebackers

Now that we are done discussing the defensive line we can move on to my favorite position, the linebackers. I could easily write an entire book about the art of playing linebacker but for the sake of time I will keep this short.

Out of all the linebackers deployed in every defense there none is more important than the middle linebacker to the 4-3. Also referred to as the "MIKE backer", he needs to be the best tackler on the team as well as its most physical player. This is because the 4-3 defense is designed to turn everything back inside towards him. Since those running plays are supposed to be funneled his direction the fullbacks, guards, centers, and tight ends frequently have a bull's-eye on his chest. If the offense can defeat the middle linebacker they can also force the defense to bring the strong safety closer to the line of scrimmage and play "8 men in the box". A defense never wants to do this because when the safety comes up and plays like a linebacker it opens up the passing game since the cornerbacks now have less help over the top.


In a base 4-3 defense the "MIKE backer" is lined up in a "zero technique" with "A or B gap" responsibility to the strong side. He keys off of the guards and the fullback and uses that read to determine what the offense is trying got do. When defending runs to the outside he will often "scrape" towards the ball but wont commit to full pursuit until he is sure there is no cutback to the inside (This is especially important against teams like the Denver Broncos that employ the bootleg and cutback runs).

Technique wise, like all linebackers, the middle linebacker must keep his knees bent and maintain a low center of gravity while moving through traffic. This not only helps him maintain his balance and explosion but it also makes him a more difficult target to block. When facing a lead block head up in the hole he must attack the blocker from underneath, stand him up, and then shed and make the tackle. If he is facing a blocker on an outside run he has to make sure the blocker does not get his head across his body, then he has to "rip" through the blockers outside shoulder.

The second most important linebacker in the 4-3 defense is the strong side linebacker, also called the "SAM". The strong side linebacker plays on the outside and he is responsible for lining up to the side of the offense that contains the most blockers. This is often determined by where the tight end, fullback, or slot receiver is lined up.

In most 4-3 defenses the strong side linebacker has four primary responsibilities. His first responsibility is to head off any runs in the "D gap" and force them back inside. The second responsibility is to jam the tight end and keep him from cracking back on the "MIKE backer" on an inside run. The third responsibility is to cover the tight end and keep him from catching passes in the middle of the field. His fourth responsibility is to backside contain and guard against the reverse or misdirection.

The other outside linebacker of the 4-3 is the weak side linebacker or the "WILL linebacker. Like the "SAM" on the other side, he must guard the "D GAP" in a base defense. If the offense uses a two tight end formation then he will play over the tight end on the weak side and assume the same responsibilities as a "SAM" linebacker.

More often than not the "WILL" linebacker is a speedy backer that is frequently asked to blitz the quarterbacks on his blind side. Because of this the weak side backer will see screen passes thrown his direction than a strong side backer would.

He is also expected to protect the back side of the defense from misdirection plays. To do this he will key off of the guard to his side and the nearest running back. Many times he will trail a pulling guard from the back side in order to stop a reverse or end around for a substantial loss.

t should be noted that in the Chiefs 4-3 defense, Coach Cunningham does not differentiate between the strong and weak side linebackers. There is a right outside linebacker and a left outside linebacker, both are expected to do the same job.

In the 3-4 the left inside linebacker is also called the "MIKE linebacker". He closely resembles his counterpart in the 4-3 except that he aligns himself in a "two technique" over the guard to the tight end side. The right inside linebacker, referred to as the "MAC Linebacker" also aligns himself in a "two technique" except he is on the "weak side" away from the tight end. In the 3-4's most basic form both the "MIKE" and "MAC" linebackers have "A and B gap" responsibility, so like the middle linebacker of the 4-3 they must play the run from the inside out. However, in many of the 3-4 scheme's ran in the NFL today you see the "MAC backer" playing more of a weak side linebackers role and the "MIKE" can likewise find himself in the strong side role.

Personnel wise the inside linebackers in the 3-4 are usually the prototypical linebacker that runs a 4.5 to 4.7 in the forty and stands 6' to 6'4"tall at 240-255lbs. Most linebackers that play inside in a 3-4 scheme can usually translate well to the middle and weak side linebacking positions in a 4-3.

The two outside linebackers of the 3-4 defense have very similar jobs, especially in the very basic concept of the defense. Both the "SAM" and "WILL" of the 3-4 will usually have "D gap" responsibility and will line up anywhere from a "7 technique" to a "9 technique".

When Coach Hank Stram first introduced the 3-4 to the NFL it was four legitimate linebackers playing zone defense behind three down linemen. Later on teams started replacing one of those outside linebackers with a pure pass rusher and now the most prevalent version has both outside linebackers rushing the passer from a defense that more closely resembles a 5-2.

The Deceptive Face Of The 3-4

Without a doubt the 3-4 defense is the poster boy for flexibility. The strength of this defense rests in the number of quick footed athletes you can place on the field at the same time.

The 3-4 is also particularly quick moving laterally. This was a primary reason why we have seen teams in the AFC West switch to the 3-4 defense in recent years, they had no answer for the stretch plays of the Kansas City Chiefs . The idea was to become light footed with additional linebackers in order to cut off the edges of the field on a more consistent basis.

Its is so versatile of a defense that you could be in what appears to be a 5-2 defense on one play and then drop back in to a 4-2-5 zone on the next. Zone blitzing is especially effective from the 3-4 because you have so many players who can do similar things. You almost have endless combinations of the zone blitzes you can call. This is what has made Bill Belichick and Romeo Crennel so successful over the past four seasons, they were completely unpredictable and nobody had any idea what they are going to do next. They did so many different things every week that at times it seemed like they were drawing defensive calls out of a hat.

So how do you stop such a versatile and unpredictable monster? Well, if you watched the Chiefs play the Ravens on Monday Night Football in 2004 there is your answer. Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders put on a clinic that night on how to run right over the top of a 3-4. Control the nose guard and block down on the inside linebackers with your guards. For what the 3-4 has in quickness and deception it also gives up in bulk and power.

The Solid 4-3

The 4-3 is based on disrupting things in the middle with physical play and attacking from the edges with speed. It is traditionally a very aggressive defense and over the years its general philosophy changed very little.

In the 4-3 you tend to see more man-to-man defense than zone assignments. It is also obvious that the defensive line takes a much more active role in pursuing the run and rushing the passer. "Line stunts" on the defensive line are another mainstay of the 4-3. "Line stunts" are designed defensive plays where defensive linemen cross and loop over one another in order to break free from offensive linemen.

If done correctly the 4-3 is also very strong against the run. The defensive ends and outside linebackers are supposed to pinch things to the inside for the defensive tackles, middle linebacker, and strong safety to clean up. The two defensive tackles also make it much more difficult for the offensive line to reach the "MIKE" backer.

Though the 4-3 is much more predictable than the 3-4 it is also more balanced against the run and the pass. For that reason you will continue to see the 4-3 remain as the more common defense throughout the NFL. However, fundamentally neither defense is better or worse. You play to the strengths of your personnel and the weaknesses of your opponent.
 

followthestar

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,164
Reaction score
173
most enjoyable read and this is exactly the type of professional journalism that i want to read. thanks for posting this so much, and i have to admit from the sound of it i can see where Ellis is coming from. i have to believe the only reason Parcells kept him around is that were we forced to "retreat" to a 4-3, Ellis would be fresh and capable.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
LaTunaNostra said:
However, fundamentally neither defense is better or worse. You play to the strengths of your personnel and the weaknesses of your opponent.
Nice way to sum up a very good article. This is why people around the game call it chess with human pieces. It really is a chess game in many ways. Looking for seems to exploit and attack. No scheme is invincible on either side of the ball. There is always a way to exploit it. You just have to find it and have the horses to do it.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
Hostile said:
Nice way to sum up a very good article. This is why people around the game call it chess with human pieces. It really is a chess game in many ways. Looking for seems to exploit and attack. No scheme is invincible on either side of the ball. There is always a way to exploit it. You just have to find it and have the horses to do it.

Helps if you have Kasparov or Fisher
making the moves. ;)
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
9,343
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Oh, almost forgot..............


In a 3-4 the defensive end has similar responsibilities to the nose tackle. Like his interior line-mate, the defensive end has to occupy blockers so the linebackers can roam free and make plays. They don't need to be sack artists or even rack up many tackles. All they need to do is make sure they are getting in the way of offensive linemen. Sadly, the defensive end of the 3-4 has the least glamorous job on defense because whenever they do their job well it winds up being the linebackers who get all of the credit.

shhhhhhhhhhhh! Don't tell Hollywood Henderson that the DE's in the 3-4 may have to "occupy and engage" he may overload.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
3-4 DE's is a very unglamorous position. Hence Ellis angst....

Guys like Seymour are invaluable. Spears and Canty are stud 3-4 DE's..... Ratliff, Coleman may get rotation. Coleman could be the sleeper in this group.
 

blindzebra

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,560
Reaction score
4,451
slick325 said:
Oh, almost forgot..............


In a 3-4 the defensive end has similar responsibilities to the nose tackle. Like his interior line-mate, the defensive end has to occupy blockers so the linebackers can roam free and make plays. They don't need to be sack artists or even rack up many tackles. All they need to do is make sure they are getting in the way of offensive linemen. Sadly, the defensive end of the 3-4 has the least glamorous job on defense because whenever they do their job well it winds up being the linebackers who get all of the credit.

shhhhhhhhhhhh! Don't tell Hollywood Henderson that the DE's in the 3-4 may have to "occupy and engage" he may overload.

He's been told several times and he ignores it, just like every other fact put under his nose.:D
 

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,722
Reaction score
11,572
Nors said:
Coleman could be the sleeper in this group.

I agree, I think Coleman could end up being a very valuable back up 3-4 DE. He just didn't seem suited to play 4-3 DE, too big bodied and slow-footed. Same for Ratliff.
If Coleman and Ratliff turn into quality backups at 3-4 DE, we'd have quite a nice rotation....with Canty and Spears ahead of them.
 

Deep_Freeze

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,225
Reaction score
3,436
What scares me, and probably most of us, is the youth we have to depend on to make the 3-4 work. Sure, we think we had a good draft right now, but we have thought this in past seasons only to be disappointed. While I hope and think that our rookies will work out, this is a huge concern with the 3-4.

The final verdict between the 4-3 and 3-4 will probably come down to the performance of our rookies. All we can do is wait and see what happens at this point.
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
Hey you know whats funny, somehow HH hasnt found his way to theis article .....I wonder why:D:D
 

THEHEREAFTER

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,862
Reaction score
6,301
Very good read! I was hoping the writer would discuss the intracacies of when the "Will" LB blitzes--- how that effects the rest of the D-line.. etc.
 

Gent

New Member
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Could Ellis rotate in as 3-4 inside linebacker on rushing downs? I'm thinking of a Jeremiah Trotter-type who primarily stuffs the run and blitzes up the middle. Or is Ellis unsuited for this type of duty?

-Gent
 

dargonking999

DKRandom
Messages
12,578
Reaction score
2,057
Gent said:
Could Ellis rotate in as 3-4 inside linebacker on rushing downs? I'm thinking of a Jeremiah Trotter-type who primarily stuffs the run and blitzes up the middle. Or is Ellis unsuited for this type of duty?

-Gent


Ellis is 30 andso its a little late for him to be trying to change postion, he's used to having his hand on the ground i dont think it woudl be a good move
 

AtlCB

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,860
Reaction score
110
Does anybody else think that Parcells and Zimmer are working on some type of hybrid 4-3 or 3-4? We have some players who can play both and some players that play only one of these well. Roy Williams is also like an extra linebacker. I think we might be rolling out something this year or next year that most offensive coordinators have never seen.
 
Top