Reverend Conehead
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,938
- Reaction score
- 11,815
I'm just curious -- how did this Ha Ha Clinton Dix guy end up with such a stupid name?
I'm just curious -- how did this Ha Ha Clinton Dix guy end up with such a stupid name?
LOL.
He’s better than Heath.
My god people.
I'm just curious -- how did this Ha Ha Clinton Dix guy end up with such a stupid name?
I am going to laugh when they roll out Heath as a starting S again.
It’s amazing how little value they put in the S position.
HaHa was atrocious with the skins last year, so bad that they didnt re-sign him after trading for him midseason. Some people legit just like to ***** n moan about every damn thing this franchise doesnt do, its absurd.
Heath? Is that you dude? I know you're an alleged jack of all trades but this is taking it to another level.1. Heath isn't as bad as everyone claims
2. Why is this safety going on his 3rd team in the same amount of years?
3. If the skins didn't want him, no thanks
I knew he would be cheap. I am disappointed he was not pursued by the Cowboys. However, he is a FS. I think they are happy with Woods at FS. However, they need to replace Heath ASAP.Thought he would have been a decent pick up and upgrade over Heath at SS.
I'm just curious -- how did this Ha Ha Clinton Dix guy end up with such a stupid name?
honest question: based on what?
Dix had a so-so year but still was more productive than Heath. In a down year, he had one more interception, one more pass break up, more tackles and less missed tackles. Heath was one of the worst in the NFL at missing tackles from the safety spot last year.
If you believe and buy into what PFF does, they had Dix as their 17th best S (which I think is overvaluing him for sure) and Heath the 81st rated S.
Make no mistake, Dix isn't Earl Thomas or Kam Chancellor in their primes or Derwin James out there for sure. But he's a better S than Heath, would have presented an upgrade for a fairly cheap, one year contract with no long term salary cap implications and would have still allowed you the flexibility to take a S in the draft if one fell to you that you liked at one of your picks.
By adding no one in FA (there are a few more names out there still that present upgrades IMO - Iloka and Boston are two that come to mind), then it would seem you would have to come out of the draft with a S.
Lmao! Ha Ha at the Bears. Dude is a shell of himself.Thought he would have been a decent pick up and upgrade over Heath at SS.
Should I just call you a hater and tell you to root for a different team if you don't like our safety? jkHeath? Is that you dude? I know you're an alleged jack of all trades but this is taking it to another level.
honest question: based on what?
Im guessing we're huntin' our next S in the draft.
Im thinkn' 2nd.6th round.
1. Heath isn't as bad as everyone claims
2. Why is this safety going on his 3rd team in the same amount of years?
3. If the skins didn't want him, no thanks
Dix had a so-so year but still was more productive than Heath. In a down year, he had one more interception, one more pass break up, more tackles and less missed tackles. Heath was one of the worst in the NFL at missing tackles from the safety spot last year.
If you believe and buy into what PFF does, they had Dix as their 17th best S (which I think is overvaluing him for sure) and Heath the 81st rated S.
Make no mistake, Dix isn't Earl Thomas or Kam Chancellor in their primes or Derwin James out there for sure. But he's a better S than Heath, would have presented an upgrade for a fairly cheap, one year contract with no long term salary cap implications and would have still allowed you the flexibility to take a S in the draft if one fell to you that you liked at one of your picks.
By adding no one in FA (there are a few more names out there still that present upgrades IMO - Iloka and Boston are two that come to mind), then it would seem you would have to come out of the draft with a S.