dooomsday;1607136 said:If TGs isnt around game 1?
Dont know that I agree with BPs move to start Hurd and keep Crayton in the slot as the #3.
I start the best players and fill in with Hurd and Isiah. Maybe line up with Wit WR. Or even TT!
Glenn is our speed receiver. No speed receiver means:dooomsday;1607136 said:If TGs isnt around game 1?
Dont know that I agree with BPs move to start Hurd and keep Crayton in the slot as the #3.
I start the best players and fill in with Hurd and Isiah. Maybe line up with Wit WR. Or even TT!
Seven;1607143 said:Ya lost me..................
Big Dakota;1607149 said:Did Parcells say he's play Hurd in TG's place and keep Crayton at #3 WR? I thought i heard Dave Campo say it would be Crayton in the #2 WR possition.
dooomsday;1607136 said:If TGs isnt around game 1?
Dont know that I agree with BPs move to start Hurd and keep Crayton in the slot as the #3.
I start the best players and fill in with Hurd and Isiah. Maybe line up with Wit WR. Or even TT!
DallasEast;1607144 said:Glenn is our speed receiver. No speed receiver means:
#1 Owens (responsibilities do not change)
#2 Hurd (downfield threat/offense will adjust to his lack of speed to stretch the field)
#3 Crayton (responsibilities do not change)
Presently, that's the best combo if Glenn's unavailable. Stanback isn't ready for primetime yet, and it's not necessary to rush him into that role--especially against a divisional opponent when experience will matter most.
Witten may line up at wideout regardless of Glenn's health status, but only in certain situations to create mismatches with the defense. You also do not want to take your tight end out of blocking situations if needed.
Tyson Thompson? Please.
DallasEast;1607144 said:Glenn is our speed receiver. No speed receiver means:
#1 Owens (responsibilities do not change)
#2 Hurd (downfield threat/offense will adjust to his lack of speed to stretch the field)
#3 Crayton (responsibilities do not change)
Presently, that's the best combo if Glenn's unavailable. Stanback isn't ready for primetime yet, and it's not necessary to rush him into that role--especially against a divisional opponent when experience will matter most.
Witten may line up at wideout regardless of Glenn's health status, but only in certain situations to create mismatches with the defense. You also do not want to take your tight end out of blocking situations if needed.
Tyson Thompson? Please.
dooomsday;1607152 said:Have another drink! LOL! I was referring to last year.
Big Dakota;1607155 said:WHAT THE HELL does what Parcells think, have ANY bearing on Wade? Have you heard Wade say IF TG is out for gane 1, they will start Hurd @ #2 WR??
dooomsday;1607152 said:Have another drink! LOL! I was referring to last year.
Seven;1607158 said:I had no clue as you referenced BP. You may want to include "last year" when posting "this" year.
No prob. it's just that sometimes we get alcohol enhanced posts and, no offense, I was kinda leaning that way. Apologies.dooomsday;1607161 said:Well, I kinda thought that was obvious, seeing that he isnt here this year, LOL! But your not alone in being confused. My apologies!
Seven;1607162 said:No prob. it's just that sometimes we get alcohol enhanced posts and, no offense, I was kinda leaning that way. Apologies.
I pray it's Crayton. He's clutch and has better hands. Hurd ain't no slouch by any stretch but right now Crayton is better. Crayton reminds me a lot of Novacek in that he seems to find those sweet spots where the defense isn't. JMO.
ELDudearino;1607546 said:Why make Crayton learn a bunch of new routes at the last minute? I'm no wr coach but it just seems to me Hurd is a plug in and a darn good one, the guy makes plays..