ThreeandOut
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,873
- Reaction score
- 4,213
We ran 1049 offensive plays last year and 658 were passes and 355 were rushes. Our opponents ran 441 rushing plays BTW. That's roughly running the ball 39% of the time. I'd like to see a better ratio. The Pats had 1191 plays of which 641 were passes. So they ran the ball about 46% of the time. That's just one team but I'd like to be in the mid forties, too.
Say we have 1150 offensive plays this year which would be pretty good. At 45% that's 517 rushes or 32 rushes a game. I'd like to see Dunbar get 8-10 touches a game which is 28% of the touches. Obviously that's my projection and also his touches will be dictated by game situations and opponents each game. That leaves on average 72% to be divided between say 2.3 RBs since you're just going to have 3 rather than 4 RBs some games due to dings and such. That's roughly 10 snaps for those 2.3. Or another way to look would be Murray gets 70% of those snaps followed by 20% for Tanner and 10% for Randle. Murray would then avg 32 rushes per game times 72% times 70% or 16 rushes per game. So 16 to 20 a game for Murray is not out of the question. Assuming he's the go to back that game.
Splits might look like this on average:
Murray 16
Dunbar 8
Tanner 5
Randle 3
I can just as easily think Tanner will get some of Murray's snaps. In fact I see Murray/Tanner/Randle as RB and Dunbar as RB/Scatback.
Those numbers will fluctuate from game to game obviously but I expect over the year to be reasonably close as long as Murray is RB1 and all stay about the same health.
If he ends up playing a Sproles type role, his receiving touches will be as significant or more so than his rushing touches.