dallasdave
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 32,326
- Reaction score
- 88,063
you have truly creative eyesight if you think Free is either nasty or all that important.
Free is not a "bad man". He is the guy that is known for being offsides
you have truly creative eyesight if you think Free is either nasty or all that important.
That's picture Tyron, Martin, Frederick, Larry Allen, and Erik Williams as the Cowboys offensive line today all playing today . There is only one way to describe that "Oh What a Rush"!!!!!!!!!!!!
Emmitt smith made that 90's line. People forget that same line sucked before enmity got there and almost got Aikman killed
Which 90s OL are we talking about because we never had the same 5 starting in our 3 superbowls.
Well, this discussion just cements my thoughts/visions of this OL ever since we drafted Martin. Of course I never would have imagined Martin becoming an All-Pro his rookie season, but I'll gladly admit I was wrong. As soon as my prayers were answered and we passed up Manziel to pick Martin, I had a visions of Dallas resurrecting the "Great Wall". So much so, that my friends laughed at me when I picked Murray in the first round of my fantasy league.(guess who had the last laugh The mere fact that this discussion exist confirms the "Great Wall II".
Second thought, Doug Free is very under estimated.. And I believe the FO thinks so too. The OL was noticeably different when he wasn't playing. Maturity, attitude, and 'Skins on the Great Wall' are hard to measure. He brought a nastiness that trickled down the right side of the line that Parnell just couldn't match. Now, I'm not saying he would replace anyone on the original Great Wall, but he's definitely worth mentioning and better than most give him credit for. And I'll add this nugget.. a few people will remember a fellow by the name of Kevin Gogan. He played on the earlier version of the 90's Cowboys OL. He's nickname was the 'Big Nasty'. My opinion, Free and Gogan could have been interchangeable.
In your opinion does this line have the potential to be better then the Great Wall?
It was very close in 2014, but it will always be limited as long as Doug Free is one of the five. Free wouldn't make the 53 man roster in 1993.
The nineties OLs usually had at least 1 just average player. Keep in mind that the Pre Car Wreck Erik Williams didn't really play together. LA because a starter after EW's car crash. I think LA started 1 game together with EW in 1994.
Guys like Gesek, Gogan, and Kennard were never what I would call elite players. They were probably all on the level of Ron Leary.
The Starting Lineups as I recall:
1992 and 1993
Mark Tuinei
Nate Newton
Mark Stepnoski
Kevin Gogan / John Gesek
Erik Williams
1994
Mark Tuinei
Nate Newton
Mark Stepnoski
Derek Kennard
Erik Williams / Larry Allen
1995
Mark Tuinei
Nate Newton
Mark Stepnoski
Larry Allen
Erik Williams (after car wreck)
SOME people have this theory all you need is to be mean> Sorry but that is BS. Tyron is just so much better the athlete that in a head to head Tui would lose the job battle.
Yeah Tui was a great scrappy player but Tyron is just so much a better athlete that in the end he would be the starter.
This cross era speculation is horse crap.
Sorry, but jmo.
Either you did not watch him play or you have clearly forgotten. Tuinei absolutely erased Bruce Smith in 2 consecutive SBs. Bruce Smith is top 3 ever. Many say only Reggie White was better. Tyron may get to that level, he's not there yet.
Tuinei, was good, very good, just ask the premier defensive end from that era Bruce Smith, he'll tell you.
Stepnoski couldn't even be a backup in today's NFL. Too small.
What's the Great Wall era? Nobody ever called it that.
I watched him play his entire career and unlike You with the creative eyesight. Tui was so scrappy and so competitive that he really accomplished more than his physical ability should have allowed. BUT unlike SOME I realize that even THAT has its limits. Tyron is sneaky strong and so quick. And that wingspan. So YES if both were at their peak (And Tyron is not there yet) Tui would lose.