I'm more concerned about how he is used, first.
I don't think we can play him too conservatively. I think we need to keep some things safe early on, but I would also like to see them throw it deep. Even if it does not get completed or even if it gets intercepted, at least it will keep the defense honest so they don't clog up the throwing lanes and protect against the screen pass.
I think if we use him in that fashion and he doesn't comply, then I would be willing to yank him earlier than if we basically play it so close to the vest and simply don't know if his lack of performance is all due to him or to the conservative play calling.
YR
I'm more concerned about how he is used, first.
I don't think we can play him too conservatively. I think we need to keep some things safe early on, but I would also like to see them throw it deep. Even if it does not get completed or even if it gets intercepted, at least it will keep the defense honest so they don't clog up the throwing lanes and protect against the screen pass.
I think if we use him in that fashion and he doesn't comply, then I would be willing to yank him earlier than if we basically play it so close to the vest and simply don't know if his lack of performance is all due to him or to the conservative play calling.
YR
Totally agree.
You cannot basically remove half the playbook for Weeden and just have him dink and dunk.
The biggest factor is if the team will rally behind him. Say what you want about him in the Arizona game last year, but the whole team didn't show-up that game--oline and Dez included.