Ill just start with the Atlanta game:
Blunder 1: Thinking that Chaz Green could simply step in for Tyrone Smith with no issues and Cooper next to him
Blunder 2: No scheme help for him with a TE or RB in case he would need it
Blunder 3: Once the first couple of sacks happened, waiting way too long to make an adjustment
These 3 blunders alone cost us the game by the time the first half was over.
Ok some points to what you posted:
You did list some blunders. but not the negativ effects the blunder had. I could interpret some of your writings on my own. So lets say the blunder with chaz green follwed the negativ outcome of 6 sacks. but that would be my own interpretation and not the initial goal. I wanted to read your not mine opinion. And seriously i dont take one game (one half of a game) to judge a HC or that a team "completely fell apart". I would review the whole season for that kind of statement.
Second you listed only the antlanta game. Your initial statement was that "The team completely fell apart once adversity hit.". I expected you list the blunders so in the end it shows that the team fell apart. I dont see any argument by you that supports your statement. To say my opinion: There were chances the team could fall apart. Like i already stated in my initial post. But it didnt. And i for myself have the opninion that had to do with the good coching by our HC.
Now to your list:
Blunder1: In the first degree to set up the OL is OL coaches duty. Not the HCs.
Blunder2: In the first degree to scheme for help is the OL coaches duty and the duty of the OC. Not the HCs.
Of course the HC has always the veto right. But to give him all the responsibility for all the decissions that were made to me is first not fair and actually also plain wrong.
Blunder3: In the first degree this is first and for all the OCs responsibility. Of course again the HC has the veto right and i am with you he should have used it earlier. But again it is NOT his lone responsibility.
So you listed 3 blunders and none proves your initial statement.
Do you got more to prove it ?