Risen Star
Likes Collector
- Messages
- 89,411
- Reaction score
- 212,317
You know what would be a good draft this year?
If we draft a DE, CB, OT, RB, S, DT (any order).
If we draft a DE, CB, OT, RB, S, DT (any order).
Guys like Suh don't hit free agency. DET is over a barrel because Stafford, CJohnson and Suh were all top 5 draft picks under the old rookie pay scale. It skewed their contracts upward dramatically. It would be almost impossible to keep all 3.
Restructure Romo, TSmith and Witten
Release Melton, DWatson and June 1st cut Carr
Leaves Dallas 50m under the 142m cap
Sign Dez 7/88m
Sign Murray 4/29m
Sign Suh 7/90m- notice all the totals are their jersey numbers
Sign Free/Parnell, Leary, Weems, Beasley
Sign Spencer, Carter/Durant, McClain, Moore
Sign P in FA
Sign KR/WR6
Sign vet CB
Draft DE, CB, OT, RB, S, DT(any order)
Scoop up a couple UDFAs
Churn roster
5m under the cap for injuries and emergencies
Sounds a lot like how folks described guys like Nnamdi Asomugha and Albert Haynesworth a few years ago. All Pro players who did nothing with their new teams and are now out of the league with nothing but dead money to show for it. The successful teams in the league win by developing through the draft and low risk free agency signings. The Broncos went all-in this year and they didn't win a playoff game and set themselves up for future cap hell.
I would be fine with that.
Suh at 12.8M per year is a bargain. He has only missed 2 games of 81 possible games in his career. He plays high percentage of the snaps. He would make the other 10 guys on defense better. People that think he is a dirty player must not remember Erik Williams because EW would make Suh look like a Choirboy.
I doubt if they give Murray that much.
I would try to fit in a mid tier free agent DE even if it meant doing without Spencer, Durant and Carter.
In your scenario they could could focus on drafting BPA with an eye towards a DE.
I don't think the reported numbers on Dekoda Watson's contract are accurate. It's the same numbers from his original contract with the Jags and the Cowboys signed him after he passed through waivers which would indicate that they gave him a lower contract. If they were going to pay his original contract they would have made a waiver claim. It seems that they signed him because they were interested in bringing him to camp in 2015. He was injured when they signed him and they kept him on the 53 for multiple games as and inactive player while he was injured. They normally wouldn't use that spot on an injured Special Teams only player.
Just like any contract the final numbers don't mean as much as the guarantees and first 3 years. Suh and Dez might get more, maybe a lot more, but there has to be an upper limit. I'm not giving Dez or Suh 16m. If they miss on either one they would have a ton of money to spend on WR, DE and DT with multiple guys.
I was just going by the 1.25m they have on Watson. At that salary he has to go, but for the min. he can stay.
I know its not the same player but Peyton took the Broncos to a super bowl. Worked for them. Lol
The only risk I see with Suh is that he gets suspended. He has already made big money and that didn't affect his on-field motivation. Both Suh and Dez seem like guys that love to play the game.
I would be more worried about Dez than Suh. I not worried about either one on the field, but Dez has some oddities about his off field life.
I would welcome Suh if we signed him. Its not like he's some over the hill guy, he is truly a dominate force on the DL and would make everyone on the DL better. He does come with baggage which makes some people hate him, but so did Charles Haley and he ended up turning out well for us. Some of the guys on D need to have some edge and swagger, and Suh has that in spades.
If we had to choose between Murray and Suh, it becomes difficult but behind this OL its alot easier to find a RB than a truly dominant DL. Give me Suh everyday and twice on Sunday. Adding Suh, picking up a DE and CB in the draft, and guess what........we could have a dominant D to go along with all that offense we already have.
They reset his disciplinary record after going 36 months without an incident, so any new suspension would have to follow multiple incidents and would only be for a game at first.
When in the salary cap era has it been successful to sign a free agent from another team to a record setting contract? Is there any case where that hasn't been an unmitigated disaster? And any reason to think Suh would be any different?
I do agree with that. I honestly do really like Murray and don't particularly want to see him go. However, from a team building standpoint spending the money on the DL vs RB is simply a smarter way to go IMO.
Murray at RB and Hayden at DT last season
vs
Gurley at RB and Suh at DT this season
One of those is much better than the other. Of course Suh will cost a good bit more than Murray so that isn't exactly apples to apples... but it gets the point across.
If you look at what we could potentially end up with it would look something like this:
Murray at RB and Micheal Bennet at DT With a mid priced DE in FA
or
Gurley or Gordon at RB and Suh at DT With no mid priced DE in FA
Of course Dallas could use the 27th pick on DE and their second for RB to end up with:
Jay Ajayi at RB, Suh at DT and Nate Orchard at DE. That would be nice as well as I particularly like Ajayi.
Anyway, the point is If Dallas pays for Suh vs Murray, there would be a lot of ways that they could end up better off.
You win in the league with strong lines... strong in the trenches... and with Suh and a draft pick or two, Dallas could be very strong on both lines.