How would you react if we go WR in the 1st

Discussion in 'Draft Zone' started by darthseinfeld, Feb 12, 2020.

  1. darthseinfeld

    darthseinfeld Cowboys Fan since 1949. Zone Supporter

    17,771 Messages
    17,711 Likes Received
    I know, thats very general. Specifics are important. However, its also looking like WR could be the best value at 17, and most of the defenders could be reaches.

    How would you react if they go WR in the first?
     
    dogberry likes this.
  2. cnuball21

    cnuball21 Well-Known Member

    2,269 Messages
    1,527 Likes Received
    Unless it’s Jeudy or Lamb...I’d be incredibly disappointed.
     
    mathew1184 likes this.
  3. reddyuta

    reddyuta Well-Known Member

    16,614 Messages
    10,381 Likes Received
    it will be a waste,pay Cooper and draft a Defensive player.
     
  4. Jake0

    Jake0 Well-Known Member

    910 Messages
    352 Likes Received
    Needs to be a 4.3 or less speedster that is a complete receiver and it's ok.

    Jeudy or Lamb and letting Amari walk might be ok if the money can be spent wisely elsewhere. Essentially conceding that the Amari trade was flat out horrendous with that move though.
     
    CCBoy, Parcells4Life and kevinhickey like this.
  5. Paintrain4978

    Paintrain4978 Active Member

    238 Messages
    195 Likes Received
    Took the word right out of my mouth.
     
  6. DFWJC

    DFWJC Well-Known Member

    46,784 Messages
    33,713 Likes Received
    If it's a stud and then we turn around and actually use the Cooper money for a defensive player in FA, I'd be ok with it.
     
    dogberry and Beaker42 like this.
  7. bodi

    bodi Well-Known Member

    5,009 Messages
    2,520 Likes Received
    this
     
    Beaker42 likes this.
  8. Rockport

    Rockport AmberBeer Zone Supporter

    17,185 Messages
    14,850 Likes Received
    Depends on what happens in FA.
     
    kskboys likes this.
  9. cowboyec

    cowboyec Well-Known Member

    15,879 Messages
    18,093 Likes Received
    this is a very good...very deep WR group.
    if they did...it would mean one of those good'ns feel to us.
    and I'd be more than good with it.
    adding Lamb or one of those 'bama kids to Cooooooop,Gallup and Cobb....:omg:
     
    darthseinfeld likes this.
  10. conner01

    conner01 Well-Known Member

    14,302 Messages
    11,847 Likes Received
    If the best guard was there would you take a guard?
    It’s the same thing to me
    You don’t reach for need but you don’t use a top pick for a guy who won’t start
     
  11. stilltheguru

    stilltheguru Well-Known Member

    5,039 Messages
    2,321 Likes Received
    Dumb move. Extremely dumb. If Dak is sp bad why are we getting a bunch of receivers? Get him a defense and a real tight end
     
    PJTHEDOORS and unionjack8 like this.
  12. BigTimeBlues

    BigTimeBlues Well-Known Member

    624 Messages
    823 Likes Received
    Is Kinlaw gone? If he is, then I wouldn't be upset
     
  13. kskboys

    kskboys Well-Known Member

    17,493 Messages
    19,766 Likes Received
    If we sign DJ Reader and Mike Daniels in FA, a WR would be fine.
     
  14. Creeper

    Creeper Well-Known Member

    1,611 Messages
    2,411 Likes Received
    The answer will always be the same for me. Who else was available when they picked the WR? We can debate all year whether or not signing Cooper at $19 million a year is the right move or not, but if Dallas chose not to pay him that kind of money and then draft a WR in the first, I would be that upset. We all want the best players to sign with Dallas, but if they ask for stupid money then its better to let them go. The same is true for Dak, although in his case I would franchise him and try to trade him to someone who would pay him the money he wants.
     
    Macnalty likes this.
  15. Beaker42

    Beaker42 Well-Known Member

    3,796 Messages
    3,284 Likes Received
    Reagor is the guy I want.
     
  16. Future

    Future Intramural Legend

    22,836 Messages
    9,183 Likes Received
    Sign Cooper. Draft a WR in the first (Ruggs/Reagor). That should be the organization's priority for the offseason.

    I don't know how anybody can watch the Chiefs and think otherwise.
     
    dogberry, UncleBlazer and Beaker42 like this.
  17. Sydla

    Sydla Well-Known Member

    39,638 Messages
    57,937 Likes Received
    When I watch the Chiefs, its not the WRs that jump off the page to me. It's the QB.

    I am not sure how the top priority for this team should be a third WR, even a fast one. Note, I am not saying WR in the first is a bad idea but there are clearly other needs (depending on FA as well) that are more important than a speedy WR at 17. It depends on how the draft board falls.

    If Kinlaw is there at 17, for example, I think it would be kind of foolish to pass on him to add Reagor or Ruggs.
     
  18. dallas72

    dallas72 Well-Known Member

    1,207 Messages
    757 Likes Received
    Chiefs also had a Dominant DT named Jones who had 2 passes knocked down a sack and 3 pressures and couldnt run up the middle ...watch the game not the stats & a Honey Badger making plays
     
  19. Sydla

    Sydla Well-Known Member

    39,638 Messages
    57,937 Likes Received
    In the end, it really comes down to how the draft board starts to unfold that night. A WR at 17 isn't the worst idea ever but if the Cowboys are sitting there and they have similar grades on a WR, DT, S or CB and all four are sitting there at 17, I think it might be foolish to take the WR in that scenario. But it's very possible that if Kinlaw goes off the board before us, the best player available at 17 might, in fact, be a WR.
     
  20. Future

    Future Intramural Legend

    22,836 Messages
    9,183 Likes Received
    Yes I know who Chris Jones is. A player like that is almost impossible to acquire.

    It's like saying go get someone like Aaron Donald. Every team would like to do that, it's not practical.
     

Share This Page