Red Dragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,395
- Reaction score
- 3,773
This has long been a pet peeve of mine: Ballcarriers who release the football a mere split second after crossing the goal line for a touchdown.
Yes, I know, the vast majority of the time, the touchdown is awarded and the player did indeed maintain possession of the ball as he crossed the plane.
Yes, I know, all scoring plays are reviewed, so if an official mistakenly believes the player fumbled before crossing the line, the touchdown might be rightfully awarded.
But is it really asking too much for a ballcarrier to simply hold on to the football for 2-3 more seconds after crossing the goal line? It causes unnecessary anxiety. The player may have already carried the ball for, what, 50 yards and nine seconds en route to the end zone; so is it really so hard to just hold on to it for a couple more seconds longer?
In my opinion, it shows poor discipline and entails the risk for incidents like DeSean Jackson's fumble-before-touchdown (Eagles @ Cowboys, 2008.)
Yes, I know, the vast majority of the time, the touchdown is awarded and the player did indeed maintain possession of the ball as he crossed the plane.
Yes, I know, all scoring plays are reviewed, so if an official mistakenly believes the player fumbled before crossing the line, the touchdown might be rightfully awarded.
But is it really asking too much for a ballcarrier to simply hold on to the football for 2-3 more seconds after crossing the goal line? It causes unnecessary anxiety. The player may have already carried the ball for, what, 50 yards and nine seconds en route to the end zone; so is it really so hard to just hold on to it for a couple more seconds longer?
In my opinion, it shows poor discipline and entails the risk for incidents like DeSean Jackson's fumble-before-touchdown (Eagles @ Cowboys, 2008.)