I Would bench T.O. and play this Giants team without him

[AMERICAS_FAN]

Maybe next time you should say what you mean so that people don't miss the point you're trying to make.

Perhaps a closer reading of the original post - and a review of "Reading Comprehension 101" - would help everyone GET the point. Just sayin...

 

[Aesop]

you are a ****ing idiot

 

[InmanRoshi]

So the problem is the system .. the same system TO ran last year that he loved and said was so much better than the previous system (which, believe it or not, TO said wasn't utilizing him properly). And if we ran a WCO offense, TO would be perfectly happy and content ... because he never, ever whined and complained and threw hissies about how he was being utilized when he was with the Eagles and Niners.

3 things ... death, taxes and TO whining about how he's not being utilized.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

you are a ****ing idiot

Wow you made it to 22 posts?:laugh2:

 

[AMERICAS_FAN]

Huh? But you just said that TO's the problem b/c he's a a selfish crybaby who wants the game-plan centered around him, and will give up if things don't go his way.

Which is it? You've lost me.

T.O. and Garrett are bothat at fualt here. T.O. actually does not cry when he knows he's the focus of the offense. He has a Jeckel and Hide persona; he behaves and plays team ball as long as he is at the center of hte offense; otherwise he turns into a liability. It's that other side of T.O. that makes him at fault here.

As for Garrett, if he wants T.O. to be an ultimate asset to him on offense then he MUST make him the focus; otherwise T.O. WILL be a detriment. Garrett knows this by now but missuses T.O. anyways; an this is where Garrett is at fault.

At the end of the day, Garrett doesn't have to like T.O.; he just has to USE T.O.. But if he refuses to use him effectively, then he's better off using alternatives he can manipulate better into his gameplan.

Why is this so hard for people to get?

 

[DaBoys4Life]

Perhaps a closer reading of the original post - and a review of "Reading Comprehension 101" - would help everyone GET the point. Just sayin...

wow....

you are a ****ing idiot

I don't think you're going to be here for to long if you keep posting like that.

 

[Boysboy]

T.O. and Garrett are bothat at fualt here. T.O. actually does not cry when he knows he's the focus of the offense. He has a Jeckel and Hide persona; he behaves and plays team ball as long as he is at the center of hte offense; otherwise he turns into a liability. It's that other side of T.O. that makes him at fault here.

As for Garrett, if he wants T.O. to be an ultimate asset to him on offense then he MUST make him the focus; otherwise T.O. WILL be a detriment. Garrett knows this by now but missuses T.O. anyways; an this is where Garrett is at fault.

At the end of the day, Garrett doesn't have to like T.O.; he just has to USE T.O.. But if he refuses to use him effectively, then he's better off using alternatives he can manipulate better into his gameplan.

Why is this so hard for people to get?

To be frank-you DO make your best players the focal point of the offense every week. No different from the Skins and Portis, Eagles and Westbrook, Giants and Jacobs, Pats and Moss, Cards and Fitzgerald, etc. Crybaby or no, he is the focal part of our O.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

T.O. and Garrett are bothat at fualt here. T.O. actually does not cry when he knows he's the focus of the offense. He has a Jeckel and Hide persona; he behaves and plays team ball as long as he is at the center of hte offense; otherwise he turns into a liability. It's that other side of T.O. that makes him at fault here.

As for Garrett, if he wants T.O. to be an ultimate asset to him on offense then he MUST make him the focus; otherwise T.O. WILL be a detriment. Garrett knows this by now but missuses T.O. anyways; an this is where Garrett is at fault.

At the end of the day, Garrett doesn't have to like T.O.; he just has to USE T.O.. But if he refuses to use him effectively, then he's better off using alternatives he can manipulate better into his gameplan.

Why is this so hard for people to get?[/QUOTE]

That depends on which side of the fence peeps are sitting on.
The absolute, can't find fault with owens guys will tell he isn't jekyll and hide.
The absolute can't stand him, he can't even play guys won't agree because they just don't want him on the field.

The middle ground is what you just wrote IMOP.
owens needs to shut up, act 35 at all times and play weather he's the focus or not. He might just find himself more involved doing it that way.

 

[Concord]

Benching T.O. is a Brilliant Idea.

Good Lord.

 

[AMERICAS_FAN]

To be frank-you DO make your best players the focal point of the offense every week. No different from the Skins and Portis, Eagles and Westbrook, Giants and Jacobs, Pats and Moss, Cards and Fitzgerald, etc. Crybaby or no, he is the focal part of our O.

No he's not. That's how it should be but it's not the case. Garrett is simply not designing this offense around t.O., and while that's the offense's main prblem, Garrett seems to be comfortable continuing this way.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

yes because i dont sit here and complain and hate on this team when we lose like the rest of you *******...but then as soon as we win we become unstoppable again

besides the few people i have seen post here, most of you sound like some **** gobbling skins fans

Take any bets on what number this guy gets to?

 

[DaBoys4Life]

yes because i dont sit here and complain and hate on this team when we lose like the rest of you *******...but then as soon as we win we become unstoppable again

besides the few people i have seen post here, most of you sound like some **** gobbling skins fans

post more......

 

[Concord]

Maybe next time you should say what you mean so that people don't miss the point you're trying to make.

:laugh2:

 

[Boysboy]

That depends on which side of the fence peeps are sitting on.
The absolute, can't find fault with owens guys will tell he isn't jekyll and hide.
The absolute can't stand him, he can't even play guys won't agree because they just don't want him on the field.

The middle ground is what you just wrote IMOP.
owens needs to shut up, act 35 at all times and play weather he's the focus or not. He might just find himself more involved doing it that way.

Just like someone said yesterday-you either love Owens, or hate him. With his explosive talent and personality throughout his career, it's easy to choose the love/hate side, but not the middle ground(as there are extremes with him).

So yeah-now all of a sudden, all these "I'm DONE with TO" threads are mind-boggling b/c most of the Zoners here who are trashing him were against him coming here anyways, while those who keep defending him are the ones who were foaming at the mouth for him to come here even AFTER he got kicked off of Philly.(BTW-I'm an anti-Owens guy myself who's currently a defender, ironically)

Like it was said-you either love him, or hate him. He's the exact same person NOW he WAS in SF, Philly, and even before he got here. So why all the ******** and griping all of a sudden?

 

[khiladi]

The timing-based offense is based upon an effective play-action pass. If there is none, as in the case with this sorry OCs offense, it will be absolutely ineffective. The safety isn't going to bite, because he doesn't have to worry about the run. Jason Garrett has absolutely no feel for the game and has no ability to keep the defenses honest. What keeps the opposing defense honest for this team right now is the ability of TR to keep drives alive and TO to get behind opposing defenses. But 'street ball' is only effective up to a point.Freakin' the guy didn't even call a fade route to Roy Williams on that drive when they were in the red-zone. He had Roy Williams run some route to the inside, though he had single coverage. You wiould think the 'Princeton' genius would take advantage of the match-ups that favor this offense, but he is clueless.

 

[Concord]

Take any bets on what number this guy gets to?

There's something to be said for saying what's on your mind.

:laugh2:

 

[MichaelWinicki]

Wow you made it to 22 posts?:laugh2:

Hey, I don't blame the poster.

Gejus... the farther we get into the season the more goofy some of these thread-starters are.

Do folks stay awake at night contemplating, "What's the stoopidest thread I can start tomorrow on the Zone in order to make every Cowboy fan look like an imbecile."

And then wake up, crawl out of bed and start the thread.

Absolutely amazing.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

There's something to be said for saying what's on your mind.

:laugh2:

:laugh2: Trust me, there is none here who wishes we could free for all like the old days at the DMN forum. Well maybe Rack but no one else.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

Hey, I don't blame the poster.

Gejus... the farther we get into the season the more goofy some of these thread-starters are.

Do folks stay awake at night contemplating, "What's the stoopidest thread I can start tomorrow on the Zone in order to make every Cowboy fan look like an imbecile."

And then wake up, crawl out of bed and start the thread.

Absolutely amazing.

Absolutely.

 

[Boyzmamacita]

Exactly what has TO done to warrant being benched? Complaining? Asking for the ball? Please. As far as stopping on routes, we'd have to bench every receiver on the team (including Witten) if that's the criterion.