I wouldn't be opposed to going DL at 34 and then DL at 67

[big dog cowboy]

Draft your board. If it comes up DL and DL, fine.

 

[JohnsKey19]

Yeah I'm hoping they're able to go WR in the 3rd, or 2nd in a trade up.

If Spence isn't available, I would not force DE at pick 34. Go DT, add talent to the DL. The last thing we should do is make a pick with the first 4 games of the season in mind. Chris Jones or Jonathan Bullard would be my early targets along with Spence.

Forgot about Billings.

 

[visionary]

Like if you went Spence at 34 and then came back with a swing guy like Day at 67.

It might be a bit of an overkill but if we are seemingly OK with what we have in the secondary, I'd love to just throw waves of DL at teams. I think that's the easiest way to get an immediate improvement on defense.

Granted, at this point, we could use help at S, CB, DL and even LB............ so I can't really knock who they take at 34 and 67 position wise as long as it's defense. So if they go some combo of DB, DL, whatever, I can live with that.

Dodd/ogbah at 34
Hargraves at 67

 

[slick325]

Like if you went Spence at 34 and then came back with a swing guy like Day at 67.

It might be a bit of an overkill but if we are seemingly OK with what we have in the secondary, I'd love to just throw waves of DL at teams. I think that's the easiest way to get an immediate improvement on defense.

Granted, at this point, we could use help at S, CB, DL and even LB............ so I can't really knock who they take at 34 and 67 position wise as long as it's defense. So if they go some combo of DB, DL, whatever, I can live with that.

This is the Sydla we've all come to love...with lucid thought out statements. But most importantly...writing something I agree with. Lol...