If Garrett leaves who becomes the OC?

[LeonDixson]

I agree and I like Sparano but I guess I just look at the fact that if Dallas was thrilled with Sparano as the OC Jerry would not have gone out and got Garrett. I know every time TO is being interviewed he always talks highly about Sherman

That could be an argument for keeping Sherman as the WR coach. He has more direct contact with Terrell than the OC does.

I don't think it was Jerry's lack of enthusiasm for Sparano that made him go out and get Jason Garrett.

I agree. The fact that they gave him the asst. HC title to prevent him from going elsewhere as on OC is more evidence of that.

Right now, I am more than happy with Wade Phillips and I am not say you are doing this, but alot of fans seems to want to push Phillips out the door when his 2 Year Contract is up.

The Boys are 11-1 and have a bright future, and no freakin way do I want to take a chance, try to fix something that isn't broken and promote Garrett when Wade is doing just fine.

Thank you! Wade is the one that has this team functioning as a TEAM and being responsible to each other. The whole attitude and the fact that the team still seems fresh as opposed to beaten down mentally and physically is due to Wade's philosophy and techniques.

I think I would go with Sparano as OC if JC leaves. Our offense under him last year was very good, especially if you consider that Parcells didn't let him open up the offense as much as Wade has allowed. One other thing about our offense last year that I don't see brought up, is that this year the defense is causing more turnovers than we saw last year. That gives the offense the ball in a better field position than otherwise, and makes it easier for the offense to score more points.

I hope JC does not leave and I believe that our offense is better under him than it would be under anyone else on our staff. He certainly uses Owens and other weapons in more advantageous ways than we have seen in the past.

 

[utrunner07]

Hey, I heard Garrett might be leaving us. I should make a thread about it. Is that okay with you?

no it is not...but feel free to use the search function and read the 1,000,435 threads that have already been started on the same subject.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

That could be an argument for keeping Sherman as the WR coach. He has more direct contact with Terrell than the OC does.

I dont get this post?

Is it a post to keep Sherman or is it a post that Sherman has more to do with TO and the offense's success than Garrett? I would think that Garrett has ALOT of direct contact with TO as well as his WR's coach.

 

[Doomsday101]

I dont get his post?

Is it a post to keep Sherman or is it a post that Sherman has more to do with TO and the offense's success than Garrett? I would think that Garrett has ALOT of direct contact with TO as well as his WR's coach.

It has to do with the close relationship that has been formed. TO is all about relationship and has constantly talked up Sherman every single time anyone does a one on one with him. Sherman has vet experiance in the league with 17 years. No doubt Garrett is the main man in the offensive success but I think Sherman has done a great job and very well could move up in the organization should Garrett leave. That is all I'm saying, I take nothing away from the great job of Garrett.

 

[LeonDixson]

I dont get his post?

Is it a post to keep Sherman or is it a post that Sherman has more to do with TO and the offense's success than Garrett? I would think that Garrett has ALOT of direct contact with TO as well as his WR's coach.

First of all I agree that the OC will have a lot of contact with the WRs. But not as much as the WRs coach, who is teaching, critcizing and commenting on a daily basis.

Doomsday101 was suggesting that Sherman would make a good OC because of his relationship with TO. I was just saying that if that relationship is so important (and I agree with Dooms that it is) then it could be an argument to keep him as the WR's coach since that is where the relationship is the most "intimate", if I can use that term figuritively.