Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
If Only the Cowboys Had Better Blocking …
By KC Joyner
The Football Scientist, KC Joyner, is a Fifth Down contributor. Lab results from “Scientific Football 2009,” to be published in August, are available for those who order the book now.
When I did the Scientific Football tour of the NFC East a few weeks ago, I intentionally skipped the Cowboys because I wanted to dovetail that post with some work I was doing with BloggingTheBoys.com. For those who might not be familiar with it, it is, in my humble opinion, the best Dallas Cowboys site around. It is run by Dave Halprin and Rafael Vela, two guys who live and breath everything about the Boys and whose dedication shows up in the quality of their work.
I’ve been corresponding with Rafael and Dave for a while, so when Dave landed an assignment to edit a Cowboys-themed magazine for Maple Street Press and asked me to do some articles, I was more than happy to say yes. The first of these articles focused on a metric review of every offensive and defensive player. I found a number of interesting and contrarian things about the Cowboys, such as:
• Their best run blocker wasn’t one of the three Dallas O linemen that made the Pro Bowl
• The one lead blocking change that could pay significant dividends
• Why Terrell Owens might not be missed nearly as much as some think (and it isn’t just because Roy Williams should be able to take up a good portion of the slack)
• One reason Bradie James might not have made the Pro Bowl
• Numbers detailing why Igor Olshansky could be an upgrade over Chris Canty
I also took a look at Jason Garrett’s playcalling and found that he was much more creative than he is given credit for. An excerpt of this article can be found on the Blogging The Boys site . If you would like to get a copy of the magazine, it can be pre-ordered via the Maple Street Press Web site and will be available on newsstands on July 21.
Now that we have that plug out of the way, I have some interesting Scientific Football Cowboys running back material to share. One of the research areas I am tracking for the book is running back productivity on rushes in which there are no Point of Attack (POA) blocking losses versus rushes with at least one POA blocking loss.
The disparity between the “all-win” POA runs and runs with at least one loss has been fairly significant for all of the backs I’ve tallied up to this point, but the Dallas backs may have the largest disparity of all. Check out the numbers:
Running back Runs w/no POA losses Yds YPA Runs w/at least one POA loss Yds YPA
Marion Barber 145 726 5.0 93 159 1.7
Felix Jones 23 249 10.8 7 17 2.4
Tashard Choice 60 433 7.2 32 39 1.2
Totals 228 1408 6.2 132 215 1.6
The metrics that stand out here are Felix Jones and Tashard Choice’s Yards Per Attempt (YPA) totals in the no POA losses category. They gained a combined total of 682 yards on 83 runs here, or 8.2 YPA. The Boys’ O-line as a whole did not play up to its potential in run blocking (three of their players were at the unacceptable POA win mark of 80% or lower), but if they can improve their consistency even by just a few percentage points, it could mean huge dividends in their rushing productivity.
Cowboys Magazine: A Look at the Running Game by KC Joyner
by Dave Halprin (Grizz) on Jul 5, 2009 9:03 PM CDT
9 comments
[Ed Note]: BTB will be running a series of posts over the next few weeks highlighting some of the articles in the new magazine Maple Street Press Cowboys Annual. You can pre-order the magazine for delivery by visiting the Maple Street Press website. We appreciate any orders, you'll be supporting Rafael and I along with BTB. So go pre-order now.
Today's feature article is by KC Joyner entitled: Six Innovative Plays: Breaking Down the Cowboys Running Game. I'll let KC do the set-up for the article and tell you more about it.
[KC Joyner]: One of the writing mountains I climb every year is putting together my annual Scientific Football book. This tome takes a detailed metric and scouting eye look at every team in the league and that task typically requires 2,000-3,000 words per franchise.
Even with that level of verbiage volume, there are still times where I am not able to pen everything I want to about a club. It was with that thought in mind that I gladly accepted an assignment from Maple Street Press to contribute to their Cowboys annual. Dave Halprin, webmaster extraordinaire for Blogging The Boys and editor of the MSP Cowboys magazine, asked if I could take on the challenge of putting together over 8,000 words in a series of metric-based articles.
I was more than happy to take on the venture because Dallas is one of those teams whose talent level and performance level don't always equal one another. I wanted to go as deep as I could into the performance metrics and scouting notes to try to get a better feel for which players were truly meeting expectations and which weren't. That was the central theme in the offensive and defensive articles in the mag.
I also wanted to take a closer look at Jason Garrett's playcalling to see if he really deserved the level of grief he was taking for the state of the Cowboys offense. I did this by taking a closer look at the Boys rushing attack, or more specifically their creative use of the counter play, an excerpt of which is posted below.
I would also like to the opportunity to invite you to take a look at my series of Scientific Football articles on the New York Times Fifth Down blog. I use these to take a look at every team in the league and will be posting one about the Cowboys running backs on Monday, July 6.
Make the jump below for the good stuff.
[Excerpt from the actual magazine article]:
By KC Joyner
The Football Scientist, KC Joyner, is a Fifth Down contributor. Lab results from “Scientific Football 2009,” to be published in August, are available for those who order the book now.
When I did the Scientific Football tour of the NFC East a few weeks ago, I intentionally skipped the Cowboys because I wanted to dovetail that post with some work I was doing with BloggingTheBoys.com. For those who might not be familiar with it, it is, in my humble opinion, the best Dallas Cowboys site around. It is run by Dave Halprin and Rafael Vela, two guys who live and breath everything about the Boys and whose dedication shows up in the quality of their work.
I’ve been corresponding with Rafael and Dave for a while, so when Dave landed an assignment to edit a Cowboys-themed magazine for Maple Street Press and asked me to do some articles, I was more than happy to say yes. The first of these articles focused on a metric review of every offensive and defensive player. I found a number of interesting and contrarian things about the Cowboys, such as:
• Their best run blocker wasn’t one of the three Dallas O linemen that made the Pro Bowl
• The one lead blocking change that could pay significant dividends
• Why Terrell Owens might not be missed nearly as much as some think (and it isn’t just because Roy Williams should be able to take up a good portion of the slack)
• One reason Bradie James might not have made the Pro Bowl
• Numbers detailing why Igor Olshansky could be an upgrade over Chris Canty
I also took a look at Jason Garrett’s playcalling and found that he was much more creative than he is given credit for. An excerpt of this article can be found on the Blogging The Boys site . If you would like to get a copy of the magazine, it can be pre-ordered via the Maple Street Press Web site and will be available on newsstands on July 21.
Now that we have that plug out of the way, I have some interesting Scientific Football Cowboys running back material to share. One of the research areas I am tracking for the book is running back productivity on rushes in which there are no Point of Attack (POA) blocking losses versus rushes with at least one POA blocking loss.
The disparity between the “all-win” POA runs and runs with at least one loss has been fairly significant for all of the backs I’ve tallied up to this point, but the Dallas backs may have the largest disparity of all. Check out the numbers:
Running back Runs w/no POA losses Yds YPA Runs w/at least one POA loss Yds YPA
Marion Barber 145 726 5.0 93 159 1.7
Felix Jones 23 249 10.8 7 17 2.4
Tashard Choice 60 433 7.2 32 39 1.2
Totals 228 1408 6.2 132 215 1.6
The metrics that stand out here are Felix Jones and Tashard Choice’s Yards Per Attempt (YPA) totals in the no POA losses category. They gained a combined total of 682 yards on 83 runs here, or 8.2 YPA. The Boys’ O-line as a whole did not play up to its potential in run blocking (three of their players were at the unacceptable POA win mark of 80% or lower), but if they can improve their consistency even by just a few percentage points, it could mean huge dividends in their rushing productivity.
Cowboys Magazine: A Look at the Running Game by KC Joyner
[Ed Note]: BTB will be running a series of posts over the next few weeks highlighting some of the articles in the new magazine Maple Street Press Cowboys Annual. You can pre-order the magazine for delivery by visiting the Maple Street Press website. We appreciate any orders, you'll be supporting Rafael and I along with BTB. So go pre-order now.
Today's feature article is by KC Joyner entitled: Six Innovative Plays: Breaking Down the Cowboys Running Game. I'll let KC do the set-up for the article and tell you more about it.
[KC Joyner]: One of the writing mountains I climb every year is putting together my annual Scientific Football book. This tome takes a detailed metric and scouting eye look at every team in the league and that task typically requires 2,000-3,000 words per franchise.
Even with that level of verbiage volume, there are still times where I am not able to pen everything I want to about a club. It was with that thought in mind that I gladly accepted an assignment from Maple Street Press to contribute to their Cowboys annual. Dave Halprin, webmaster extraordinaire for Blogging The Boys and editor of the MSP Cowboys magazine, asked if I could take on the challenge of putting together over 8,000 words in a series of metric-based articles.
I was more than happy to take on the venture because Dallas is one of those teams whose talent level and performance level don't always equal one another. I wanted to go as deep as I could into the performance metrics and scouting notes to try to get a better feel for which players were truly meeting expectations and which weren't. That was the central theme in the offensive and defensive articles in the mag.
I also wanted to take a closer look at Jason Garrett's playcalling to see if he really deserved the level of grief he was taking for the state of the Cowboys offense. I did this by taking a closer look at the Boys rushing attack, or more specifically their creative use of the counter play, an excerpt of which is posted below.
I would also like to the opportunity to invite you to take a look at my series of Scientific Football articles on the New York Times Fifth Down blog. I use these to take a look at every team in the league and will be posting one about the Cowboys running backs on Monday, July 6.
Make the jump below for the good stuff.
[Excerpt from the actual magazine article]:
Let's start with the most basic bread-and-butter power running play, the counter. Dallas ran some variant of this play 93 times last season, making it easily their #1 rushing choice. The Cowboys typically use the counter play to attack the left flank of the opposing defense, as fifty-eight of those ninety-three counter-style runs were directed towards the right side of the Boys offense.
A good example of how to properly execute this play occurred in week 17 game against the Eagles in week 17. Dallas used an I-right formation with a pro set (two running backs, two wide receivers, one tight end on the right side of the offensive line) against the Eagles standard 4-3 front. The conceptual idea behind the play is that the offense is partially selling a run to one side of the field and then sending the ballcarrier to the other. The subterfuge is a temporary ruse designed to get the linebackers to take a step in the wrong direction, thus giving the point of attack blockers the initiative and a slight time advantage on their blocks.
Its success revolves around four blocking areas. The first three are the triangle of the left defensive end/strongside linebacker/middle linebacker. These three are the point of attack impediments and must be moved out of the way for the ballcarrier to gain yards.
A triumvirate of blockers has the responsibility of accomplishing that task. The first of these three is the right tackle. In our example play, Marc Columbo's responsibility isn't just to neutralize the left defensive end with an angle block. He is to try to drive the end as far away from the hole as possible.
The second is the fullback, who on this play was Deon Anderson. Anderson's job is to perform a running drive block at the strongside linebacker. His goal is similar to the tackle's in that he wants to push the defender out of the hole as far as possible, but it is made more difficult because of the amount of ground the fullback has to cover before he can make his block. That might be too big of an impediment to overcome except that the outside linebacker has the responsibility for keeping the play from bouncing outside of his gap. That obligation is such that Anderson should have enough time to make his block if he gets on his horse.
As soon as the tackle and fullback start making their moves, the middle linebacker will immediately key the tight end to see where he is going. Once the tight end passes him by to block the backside pursuit by the weakside linebacker, the middle linebacker will recognize the counter run and close to try to fill the gap.
That's where the third person in our trio, left guard Cory Procter, comes in. His main focus is to ensure that the middle linebacker does not stuff the gap. If everything goes well, Procter will leave the hole completely clean of the linebacker fill but at the very least he needs to make sure that the linebacker is blocked to one side or the other so that some kind of run lane crease is made. The worst result is if the guard does not clear the linebacker out, as the runner will either get stuffed in the hole or will have to bounce the run outside of the intended point of attack of the run.
When these blocks are made, the halfback will find a lane that can only be closed by the strong safety. If the safety moves quickly, he can usually hold the play to around five yards, but if he misses the tackle, this run can turn into big yards in a hurry.
