If Teddy B. Does the Rodgers slide to 16, do you take him?

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,514
Reaction score
17,236
Yes.I am not not sure what jerry would do if a if a top qb slips to 16,he would probably draft manziel a and try to see if can get somebody to move up if Bridgewater falls.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
What kind of nonsense is this? Unless your last name is Manning you dont have a say in where you "want" to go coming into the NFL. Theoretically if Bridgewater or Manziel slide and the Cowboys draft them they'll be holding a clipboard for all of 6 weeks before they are starting.

Your projecting your fantasies aside, they absolutely have a say. It's just rarely exercised (a la Manning) because most teams aren't stupid enough to draft players they a) don't need and b) who don't want to be there.
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,944
Reaction score
8,681
Not even a question. You grab a potential franchise qb at 16 no matter what
 

The Natural

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,205
Reaction score
18,969
Your projecting your fantasies aside, they absolutely have a say. It's just rarely exercised (a la Manning) because most teams aren't stupid enough to draft players they a) don't need and b) who don't want to be there.

No they dont
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
Prove it. Dont quote me until you do please

Your posts are so laughable I honestly don't think I could go very long without quoting you. It's just so irresistible.

Before I do prove it and then you move the goalpost like you always do, why don't you say upfront what it would take to prove it? You know darn well what I am trying to say, but you are obviously trying to twist it somehow.
 

jhamilton8

New Member
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
I'm not downgrading him because of his pro day... I saw him play and I came away unimpressed. He was outplayed by a freshman qb for goodness sake! How does that scream 1st rnd pick? He has a tiny frame. That means he can't really put on any meaningful weight.... I mean he is tiny! Have you seen his arms? He has a good arm but no better than most of the qb's in this class and he falls apart mentally under duress.

I'm curious what about him that made you think he was mentally weak. Was it when he was 14 and tried to drop out of school to get a job to help with his mom's cancer treatment bills? The guy led Louisville to a comeback with a broken wrist and sprained ankle in a game where Rutgers knew he could only take snaps out of shotgun with a BCS bowl on the line.
 

The Natural

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,205
Reaction score
18,969
Your posts are so laughable I honestly don't think I could go very long without quoting you. It's just so irresistible.

Before I do prove it and then you move the goalpost like you always do, why don't you say upfront what it would take to prove it? You know darn well what I am trying to say, but you are obviously trying to twist it somehow.

I dont think I've seen another poster on here say as much while not actually saying anything as much as you. To the ignore list you go.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
What we would do is irrelevant.

But if the FO really and truly thinks Bridgewater is a sure-fire franchise QB AND we have no player rated as highly as him in a position of greater need, yes, you take the player.

However, clearly common sense says that if Teddy fell all the way to 16, that means many, many teams have serious doubts that he is a true franchise QB.
Right?
If that unlikely scenario was true, there would be a real chance that Dallas may also feel that way. The same logic applies to Manziel or Bortles too.

It's all hypothetical, I'm sure most (though not all) teams feel he is . So, with all the QB needy teams out there, he will be long gone by 16.
 

Western

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,065
Reaction score
2,654
1. The quality of the top 10-12 players in this draft allows a "QB needy team" to bypass and trump a Manziel and/or Bridegwater selection and select a Khalil Mack, Jake Mathews, J. Clowney, Sammy Watkins, Anthony Barr, Greg Robinson, Taylor Lewan, Justin Gilbert, Mike Evans, or Aaron Donald.

2. The "QB needy teams" also have the luxury in the early 2nd round if they feel compelled, to select a Carr, Garoppolo, or McCarron. In addition, the "QB needy teams" have veteran QB's already signed as protection in avoiding the obligatory demand in drafting a QB in the 1st round.

The assumption that "QB needy teams" are mandated to select a QB in the early 1st round overlooks the superior talent in other positions in the very early 1st round.
Dallas should feel fortunate and lucky if either Manziel or Bridgewater slides to them at 16.
 

Vinnie2u

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,817
Reaction score
11,269
What we would do is irrelevant.

But if the FO really and truly thinks Bridgewater is a sure-fire franchise QB AND we have no player rated as highly as him in a position of greater need, yes, you take the player.

However, clearly common sense says that if Teddy fell all the way to 16, that means many, many teams have serious doubts that he is a true franchise QB.
Right?
If that unlikely scenario was true, there would be a real chance that Dallas may also feel that way. The same logic applies to Manziel or Bortles too.

It's all hypothetical, I'm sure most (though not all) teams feel he is . So, with all the QB needy teams out there, he will be long gone by 16.

Thing is teams do let franchise qbs fall. Remember we picked spears over Rodgers
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,316
Reaction score
37,215
I would let the clock run very close to the end hoping that phone rings with a great trade up offer. If not I still don't select him. He is not a franchise QB. if he was, he wouldn't be sliding.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
I would let the clock run very close to the end hoping that phone rings with a great trade up offer. If not I still don't select him. He is not a franchise QB. if he was, he wouldn't be sliding.
AH, I see you subscribe to the Mickey Spags philosophy
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Thing is teams do let franchise qbs fall. Remember we picked spears over Rodgers

No doubt.

My point was that on draft day, as it turned out, most teams did not think Rodgers was a for sure franchise QB, or he would have been taken in the top 5 or so. If they knew what we know now, he goes #1 overall.
So this year, if a bunch of teams have enough doubts to let one of the higher rated QBs (at least by pre-draft ESPN, etc draftnix, but not necessarily GMs) fall, then why would Dallas think differently than the teams before them? They might, but it's not a given.

Not saying it's right or wrong, but players fall for a reason. It is clear indication of what teams (and not draft websight draft gurus) think of a player on draft day.

I can't see Bridgewater dropping to 16 this year. Manziel...maybe, but I doubt it.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Nope.

Not because I am against taking a QB but because I don't really love Bridgewater.
 

KB1122

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,328
Reaction score
1,629
The bigger issue with the Pro Day is whether he shrinks under pressure. Being the Cowboys quarterback isn't the same as being the Panthers quarterback or the Falcons quarterback. You have to be able to stand the spotlight.

I'm not passing judgment either way.
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,316
Reaction score
37,215
I would rather give up the farm for an Andrew Luck than throw the dice for a hope and a prayer for a potential franchise QB in late rounds or even a middle of the first round QB.
 
Top